7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Engineering adeno-associated viral vectors to evade innate immune and inflammatory responses

      1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 4 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 7 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 5 , 6 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 13 , 14 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 9 , 9 , 15 , 16 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 4 , 17 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 18 , 2 , 19 , 20 , 1 , 2
      Science Translational Medicine
      American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Nucleic acids are used in many therapeutic modalities, including gene therapy, but their ability to trigger host immune responses in vivo can lead to decreased safety and efficacy. In the case of adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors, studies have shown that the genome of the vector activates Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), a pattern recognition receptor that senses foreign DNA. Here, we engineered AAV vectors to be intrinsically less immunogenic by incorporating short DNA oligonucleotides that antagonize TLR9 activation directly into the vector genome. The engineered vectors elicited markedly reduced innate immune and T cell responses and enhanced gene expression in clinically relevant mouse and pig models across different tissues, including liver, muscle, and retina. Subretinal administration of higher-dose AAV in pigs resulted in photoreceptor pathology with microglia and T cell infiltration. These adverse findings were avoided in the contralateral eyes of the same animals that were injected with the engineered vectors. However, intravitreal injection of higher-dose AAV in macaques, a more immunogenic route of administration, showed that the engineered vector delayed but did not prevent clinical uveitis, suggesting that other immune factors in addition to TLR9 may contribute to intraocular inflammation in this model. Our results demonstrate that linking specific immunomodulatory noncoding sequences to much longer therapeutic nucleic acids can "cloak" the vector from inducing unwanted immune responses in multiple, but not all, models. This "coupled immunomodulation" strategy may widen the therapeutic window for AAV therapies as well as other DNA-based gene transfer methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Single-Dose Gene-Replacement Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy

          Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) is a progressive, monogenic motor neuron disease with an onset during infancy that results in failure to achieve motor milestones and in death or the need for mechanical ventilation by 2 years of age. We studied functional replacement of the mutated gene encoding survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) in this disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature for Reporting Clinical Data. Results of the First International Workshop

            To begin a process of standardizing the methods for reporting clinical data in the field of uveitis. Consensus workshop. Members of an international working group were surveyed about diagnostic terminology, inflammation grading schema, and outcome measures, and the results used to develop a series of proposals to better standardize the use of these entities. Small groups employed nominal group techniques to achieve consensus on several of these issues. The group affirmed that an anatomic classification of uveitis should be used as a framework for subsequent work on diagnostic criteria for specific uveitic syndromes, and that the classification of uveitis entities should be on the basis of the location of the inflammation and not on the presence of structural complications. Issues regarding the use of the terms "intermediate uveitis," "pars planitis," "panuveitis," and descriptors of the onset and course of the uveitis were addressed. The following were adopted: standardized grading schema for anterior chamber cells, anterior chamber flare, and for vitreous haze; standardized methods of recording structural complications of uveitis; standardized definitions of outcomes, including "inactive" inflammation, "improvement'; and "worsening" of the inflammation, and "corticosteroid sparing," and standardized guidelines for reporting visual acuity outcomes. A process of standardizing the approach to reporting clinical data in uveitis research has begun, and several terms have been standardized.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65 -mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

              Background Phase 1 studies have shown potential benefit of gene replacement in RPE65 -mediated inherited retinal dystrophy. This phase 3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec in participants whose inherited retinal dystrophy would otherwise progress to complete blindness. Methods In this open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial done at two sites in the USA, individuals aged 3 years or older with, in each eye, best corrected visual acuity of 20/60 or worse, or visual field less than 20 degrees in any meridian, or both, with confirmed genetic diagnosis of biallelic RPE65 mutations, sufficient viable retina, and ability to perform standardised multi-luminance mobility testing (MLMT) within the luminance range evaluated, were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to intervention or control using a permuted block design, stratified by age (<10 years and ≥10 years) and baseline mobility testing passing level (pass at ≥125 lux vs <125 lux). Graders assessing primary outcome were masked to treatment group. Intervention was bilateral, subretinal injection of 1·5×10 11 vector genomes of voretigene neparvovec in 0·3 mL total volume. The primary efficacy endpoint was 1-year change in MLMT performance, measuring functional vision at specified light levels. The intention-to-treat (ITT) and modified ITT populations were included in primary and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00999609, and enrolment is complete. Findings Between Nov 15, 2012, and Nov 21, 2013, 31 individuals were enrolled and randomly assigned to intervention (n=21) or control (n=10). One participant from each group withdrew after consent, before intervention, leaving an mITT population of 20 intervention and nine control participants. At 1 year, mean bilateral MLMT change score was 1·8 (SD 1·1) light levels in the intervention group versus 0·2 (1·0) in the control group (difference of 1·6, 95% CI 0·72–2·41, p=0·0013). 13 (65%) of 20 intervention participants, but no control participants, passed MLMT at the lowest luminance level tested (1 lux), demonstrating maximum possible improvement. No product-related serious adverse events or deleterious immune responses occurred. Two intervention participants, one with a pre-existing complex seizure disorder and another who experienced oral surgery complications, had serious adverse events unrelated to study participation. Most ocular events were mild in severity. Interpretation Voretigene neparvovec gene replacement improved functional vision in RPE65 -mediated inherited retinal dystrophy previously medically untreatable. Funding Spark Therapeutics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Science Translational Medicine
                Sci. Transl. Med.
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                1946-6234
                1946-6242
                February 10 2021
                February 10 2021
                February 10 2021
                February 10 2021
                : 13
                : 580
                : eabd3438
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                [2 ]Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                [3 ]Ally Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
                [4 ]Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
                [5 ]Inserm U974, Sorbonne Universite, Paris 75651, France.
                [6 ]Inserm S951 and Genethon, Evry 91000, France.
                [7 ]Ophthalmology, Charles River Laboratories, Mattawan, MI 49071, USA.
                [8 ]Statistics and Data Science, Charles River Laboratories, Mattawan, MI 49071, USA.
                [9 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
                [10 ]Horae Gene Therapy Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
                [11 ]Li Weibo Institute for Rare Diseases Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
                [12 ]Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
                [13 ]Grousbeck Gene Therapy Center, Schepens Eye Research Institute and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                [14 ]Ocular Genomics Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
                [15 ]Ocular Sciences LLC, St. Louis, MO 63112, USA.
                [16 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
                [17 ]Institute of Ophthalmology and the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital and University College London, London EC1V 9EL, UK.
                [18 ]Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
                [19 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                [20 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                Article
                10.1126/scitranslmed.abd3438
                33568518
                1ab5f64f-722d-4d2e-be69-e35040877a94
                © 2021

                https://www.sciencemag.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article