1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Skin protection against methylmethacrylate

      , ,
      Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ordinary surgical rubber gloves are penetrated by methylmethacrylate monomer (MMA) in less than 1 minute, as demonstrated by gas chromatographic measurements. A three-layered PVP glove, 0.07 mm thick--consisting of an outer layer of polyethylene, an intermediary layer of ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, and an inner layer of polyethylene--was impervious for 20 minutes, whereas a viton-butyl rubber glove, 0.27 mm thick, was impervious for 15 minutes. The PVP glove is recommended to orthopedic surgeons, nurses, and other handling acrylic bone cements to avoid sensitization, and is especially recommended to persons with known contact allergy to MMA.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Contact Dermatitis from Penetration of Rubber Gloves by Acrylic Monomer

          An orthopaedic surgeon developed dermatitis from acrylic materials. The acrylic monomer was found to penetrate surgical rubber gloves readily. Cases of "rubber glove dermatitis" with negative patch tests may have a similar explanation. Laboratory tests suggest that monomer does not damage rubber sufficiently to allow bacteria to penetrate gloves, but it remains possible that this would happen under theatre conditions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sensitizing potential of 14 mono (meth) acrylates in the guinea pig.

            The aim of this study was to investigate differences in the sensitizing potential of 14 mono(meth)acrylates, when tested by the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) and Freund's complete adjuvant test (FCAT) with an identical, intradermal induction concentration. A new grading classification of the sensitization potential is proposed. Mono(meth)acrylates show a wide range of sensitizing potential. Compared with other (meth)acrylates, methyl methacrylate is a moderate sensitizer. Attention was paid to concomitant sensitization of additives. In 9 of 16 FCATs, concomitant sensitization occurred to the inhibitors hydroquinone and p-methoxyphenol.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Contact dermatitis to methyl methacrylate.

              2 cases of contact dermatitis to methyl methacrylate monomer are presented. The patients are nurses who mixed bone cement at orthopedic operations. During the procedure, they used 2 pairs of gloves (latex). Butyl rubber gloves are recommended for methyl methacrylate monomer to avoid sensitization and/or cumulative irritant contact dermatitis on the hands.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
                Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
                Informa UK Limited
                0001-6470
                July 08 2009
                January 1987
                July 08 2009
                January 1987
                : 58
                : 3
                : 236-238
                Article
                10.3109/17453678709146473
                2957888
                1a9c710a-69e4-4598-b15e-06a1cff4e04d
                © 1987
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article