0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗与手术治疗局部晚期可切除非小细胞肺癌的短期疗效比较 Translated title: Comparison of Short-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy and Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          背景与目的 肺癌是中国发生率和死亡率均排名第一的癌症,非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)占所有肺恶性肿瘤的80%-85%。目前,手术治疗仍是肺癌主要的治疗方式。近年来,免疫检查点抑制剂在NSCLC中的疗效已成为共识,新辅助免疫联合化疗(neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, nICT)在早中期NSCLC中显示出来良好的疗效和安全性。然而,nICT治疗局部晚期NSCLC的相关研究较少。本研究旨在评估程序性死亡受体1(programmed cell death 1, PD-1)抑制剂联合含铂两药新辅助治疗治疗局部晚期可切除NSCLC的有效性和安全性。 方法 纳入2021年1月至2024年4月于兰州大学第二医院胸外科就诊的85例确诊可切除IIIA、IIIB期患者,分为nICT组(n=32)和单纯手术组(n=53),比较两组患者的临床基线资料、围手术期相关指标及术后并发症,并评估nICT组的影像学缓解率、病理学缓解率、相关不良反应发生率、生活质量。 结果 两组患者临床基线资料差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。nICT组选择开胸方式比单纯手术组发生率高(P=0.002),两组手术时间、术中出血量、清扫淋巴结个数、带管时间、术后住院时间及R0切除率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。nICT组与单纯手术组术后总并发症发生率分别为31.25%和22.64%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.380)。nICT组中客观缓解率(objective response rate, ORR)为84.38%,完全缓解(complete response, CR)5例(15.63%),部分缓解(partial response, PR)22例(68.75%),病理性完全缓解(pathological complete response, pCR)15例(46.88%),主要病理缓解(major pathological reaponse, MPR)11例(34.38%)。nICT治疗期间,3级治疗相关不良反应共12例(37.50%),无不良反应或免疫相关不良反应导致患者死亡。而且,nICT治疗后患者相关症状有所改善。 结论 nICT治疗局部晚期可切除NSCLC显示出良好的疗效,治疗相关不良事件可控,是局部晚期可切除NSCLC安全、可行的新辅助治疗模式。

          Translated abstract

          Background and objective Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest incidence and mortality rates in China, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80%-85% of all malignant lung tumors. Currently, surgical treatment remains the primary treatment modality for lung cancer. In recent years, the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC has become a consensus, and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) has shown promising efficacy and safety in early to intermediate stage NSCLC. However, there are fewer studies related to nICT for locally advanced NSCLC. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nICT therapy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC. Methods 85 confirmed resectable stage IIIA and IIIB patients treated in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, from January 2021 to April 2024, were divided into the nICT group (n=32) and the surgery alone group (n=53). Clinical baseline data, perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, imaging response rate, pathological response rate, incidence of adverse events, and quality of life were compared between the two groups. Results There were no statistically significant differences in clinical baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). Incidence of choosing thoracotomy was higher in the nICT group than in the surgery alone group (P=0.002). There were no significant differences in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, duration of chest tube placement, postoperative hospital stay, and R0 resection rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 31.25% in the nICT group and 22.64% in the surgery alone group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.380). In the nICT group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 84.38%, with 5 cases of complete response (CR)(15.63%), 22 cases of partial response (PR)(68.75%), 15 cases of pathological response rate (pCR)(46.88%), and 11 cases of major pathological reaponse (MPR) (34.38%). During nICT treatment, 12 cases (37.50%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, no death induced by adverse events or immune related adverse events. Moreover, the symptoms of the patients were improved after nICT treatment. Conclusion Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy shows promising efficacy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC, with manageable treatment-related adverse events. It is a safe and feasible neoadjuvant treatment modality for locally advanced resectable NSCLC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

          Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

            Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. This shortcoming hampers comparison of outcome data among different centers and therapies and over time. A classification of complications published by one of the authors in 1992 was critically re-evaluated and modified to increase its accuracy and its acceptability in the surgical community. Modifications mainly focused on the manner of reporting life-threatening and permanently disabling complications. The new grading system still mostly relies on the therapy used to treat the complication. The classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients who underwent elective general surgery at our institution. The reproducibility and personal judgment of the classification were evaluated through an international survey with 2 questionnaires sent to 10 surgical centers worldwide. The new ranking system significantly correlated with complexity of surgery (P < 0.0001) as well as with the length of the hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A total of 144 surgeons from 10 different centers around the world and at different levels of training returned the survey. Ninety percent of the case presentations were correctly graded. The classification was considered to be simple (92% of the respondents), reproducible (91%), logical (92%), useful (90%), and comprehensive (89%). The answers of both questionnaires were not dependent on the origin of the reply and the level of training of the surgeons. The new complication classification appears reliable and may represent a compelling tool for quality assessment in surgery in all parts of the world.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

              In 1986, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) initiated a research program to develop an integrated, modular approach for evaluating the quality of life of patients participating in international clinical trials. We report here the results of an international field study of the practicality, reliability, and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30, the current core questionnaire. The QLQ-C30 incorporates nine multi-item scales: five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Several single-item symptom measures are also included. The questionnaire was administered before treatment and once during treatment to 305 patients with nonresectable lung cancer from centers in 13 countries. Clinical variables assessed included disease stage, weight loss, performance status, and treatment toxicity. The average time required to complete the questionnaire was approximately 11 minutes, and most patients required no assistance. The data supported the hypothesized scale structure of the questionnaire with the exception of role functioning (work and household activities), which was also the only multi-item scale that failed to meet the minimal standards for reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient > or = .70) either before or during treatment. Validity was shown by three findings. First, while all interscale correlations were statistically significant, the correlation was moderate, indicating that the scales were assessing distinct components of the quality-of-life construct. Second, most of the functional and symptom measures discriminated clearly between patients differing in clinical status as defined by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale, weight loss, and treatment toxicity. Third, there were statistically significant changes, in the expected direction, in physical and role functioning, global quality of life, fatigue, and nausea and vomiting, for patients whose performance status had improved or worsened during treatment. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were highly consistent across the three language-cultural groups studied: patients from English-speaking countries, Northern Europe, and Southern Europe. These results support the EORTC QLQ-C30 as a reliable and valid measure of the quality of life of cancer patients in multicultural clinical research settings. Work is ongoing to examine the performance of the questionnaire among more heterogenous patient samples and in phase II and phase III clinical trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi
                Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi
                Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
                Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer (No. 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, PRC, 300052 )
                1009-3419
                1999-6187
                20 June 2024
                : 27
                : 6
                : 421-430
                Affiliations
                [1] 730030 兰州,兰州大学第二医院(第二临床医学院)胸外科 Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
                Author notes
                李斌,E-mail: leebin@ 123456lzu.edu.cn

                Author contributions: Li HT, Li B, Meng YQ conceived and designed the study. Li HT and Liu Q analyzed the data. Chen YZ, Lin JP and Feng HM contributed analysis tools. Zheng ZZ and Hui YM provided critical inputs on design, analysis, and interpretation of the study. All the authors had access to the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

                Article
                10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.26
                11258643
                39026493
                1a6d8866-5097-4738-8748-f20d6e9be644
                版权所有 © 2024《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部Copyright © 2024, Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.

                History
                : 18 May 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: 兰州大学产学研技术开发项目
                Funded by: grant from Technological Development Contract of Lanzhou University
                Award ID: 230453
                Award Recipient : Bin LI
                Categories
                Clinical Research

                肺肿瘤,新辅助免疫化疗,pd-1抑制剂,客观缓解率,并发症,lung noeplasms,neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy,pd-1 inhibitors,objective response rate,complication

                Comments

                Comment on this article