0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The emergency medical teams initiative in the WHO African region: a review of the development and progress over the past 7 years

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The WHO Emergency Medical Teams (EMT) Initiative coordinates the deployment of qualified medical teams who promptly respond to public health emergencies (PHEs) and provide quality service during emergencies whilst strengthening capacity. Globally, 40 EMTs have been classified between 2016 and the present (as of the writing of this article in December 2023) and are from across all the WHO regions except the WHO Africa Region (AFRO). However, WHO Africa has prioritised the implementation of EMTs in 10 priority countries to address the public health emergencies (PHEs) affecting the region.

          Objective

          This article describes the development and progress of national EMTs in the WHO African Region over the past 7 years and elucidates the main lessons learned and the complexity and challenges in the process.

          Methods

          This study employed a case study approach because of its appropriateness in examining a complex social phenomenon in a socio-political context in depth, using multiple lenses simultaneously. Data and information were obtained through document reviews and key informant interviews (KIIs) ( n = 5) with the members of the EMT Initiative on shared field experiences. Data were systematically analysed using the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) framework, and the lessons learnt were presented using components of a framework from Adini et al.

          Results

          The Initiative commenced in the WHO African Region following its launch in December 2017 in Senegal. The assessments of the concept’s engagement (involved learning and deciding), feasibility (reviewing expectation and capacity), and readiness planning (collaborating and preparing) showed that the context-specific (African context) challenges, lessons from different emergency response actions mainly guided the Initiative’s pre-implementation phase in the region and prompted the WHO emergency leadership on the urgency and need for the EMT concept in the region. The assessment of the implementation processes showed progress in key areas, with staff demonstrating improved competency, EMT services maintaining high fidelity, effective consultation launching critical components, and ongoing services providing successful support and monitoring. Creating the N-EMTs and revitalising the EMT concept required an aligned strategy with other regional emergency programmes and a futuristic vision. Proposed sustainability and governance components include creating N-EMT, developing a coordination structure, collaborating with partners, and finalising the N-EMT.

          Conclusion

          The Initiative is an imperative component that would allow better-targeted management of health emergencies in the region. The continuous refinement of the EMT initiative is crucial. There is a need to work on additional components, such as a context-specific framework for collaborations and partnerships that would enhance deployment and procurement modalities and the complementarity between other regional initiatives to improve the work. Emphasis should be placed on strengthening local health systems, enhancing training and capacity-building programmes, and fostering regional and international collaborations. Additionally, sustainable funding and resource allocation are essential to ensure the resilience of EMTs in the African region and their long-term success.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

            The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains. Following scoping searches, an examination was made of the vocabulary associated with the literature of review and synthesis (literary warrant). A simple analytical framework -- Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) -- was used to examine the main review types. Fourteen review types and associated methodologies were analysed against the SALSA framework, illustrating the inputs and processes of each review type. A description of the key characteristics is given, together with perceived strengths and weaknesses. A limited number of review types are currently utilized within the health information domain. Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive. Notwithstanding such limitations, this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance

              Process evaluation is an essential part of designing and testing complex interventions. New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2739150/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2745057/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1191757/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2057554/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1236746/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2121315/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/403916/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                25 June 2024
                2024
                : 12
                : 1387034
                Affiliations
                [1] 1World Health Organisation, Emergency Preparedness and Response Programme, Regional Hub for West Africa , Dakar, Senegal
                [2] 2World Health Organisation, Emergency Medical Teams Initiative , Geneva, Switzerland
                [3] 3Centre for Health Services Studies (CHSS), University of Kent , Canterbury, United Kingdom
                [4] 4World Health Organisation, Emergency Preparedness and Response Programme, Regional Office for Africa , Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of Congo
                [5] 5World Health Organisation , Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
                [6] 6University of Kinshasa, One Health Institute for Africa , Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
                [7] 7World Health Organisation , Yangon, Myanmar
                [8] 8World Health Organisation, Department of Strategic Health Operations , Geneva, Switzerland
                [9] 9World Health Organisation, Global Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme , Geneva, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Qiang Zhang, Beijing Normal University, China

                Reviewed by: Voicescu George Teo, University of Eastern Piedmont, Italy

                Enyi Ifeoma Etiaba, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria

                *Correspondence: Joseph Okeibunor, okeibunorj@ 123456who.int
                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2024.1387034
                11231368
                38983265
                1a356506-4353-49d0-a8fd-d549200b5a89
                Copyright © 2024 Balde, Oyugi, Mbasha, Kamara, Martinez-Monterrey, Relan, Lajolo, Bompangue, Fortin, Okeibunor, Salio, Braka, Chamla, Gueye, Yao and Fall.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 February 2024
                : 06 June 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 65, Pages: 15, Words: 11267
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the WHO EMT team at the Global Office in Geneva, Switzerland. The WHO AFRO also supported the reported activities. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, publication decisions, or manuscript preparation.
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Disaster and Emergency Medicine

                emergency medical teams,who african region,public health,health emergencies,covid-19

                Comments

                Comment on this article