6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ankyloglossia (tongue tie) in infants

      other
      , MD, , MD, , MD
      CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
      CMA Impact Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ankyloglossia describes decreased tongue mobility related to a tight lingual frenulum The lingual frenulum is a tissue fold created by tongue elevation. In ankyloglossia, oral examination may reveal a short, tight frenulum that inserts either toward the tongue tip or onto the mandibular alveolus (the tooth-bearing surface of the lower jaw). Clinicians should evaluate range of motion of the infant’s tongue (elevation and protrusion) and breastfeeding, as the diagnosis is functional. The incidence of ankyloglossia is roughly 4%.1 The condition may cause difficulty with breastfeeding, especially parental pain with latch1 Nipple pain has a broad differential diagnosis.2 Skilled evaluation by a physician with comfort in breastfeeding medicine or an international board-certified lactation consultant is necessary. Optimizing infant latch and position is essential, while considering and managing other possible causes such as nipple vasospasm, plugged ducts and mastitis.2 Conservative management is appropriate in some cases Optimizing infant attachment at the breast is the mainstay of conservative management.2 If experienced clinicians are unable to facilitate improved breastfeeding for infants with ankyloglossia, frenotomy may be considered. Lingual frenotomy is a relatively safe procedure to treat ankyloglossia Laser is not superior to scissors for frenotomy.3 Postoperative exercises are not necessary.4 Infants should be ideally aged 3–6 months or younger for the procedure; clinicians can prescribe sucrose for pain control and should avoid general anesthesia. Complications — such as hemorrhage, lingual nerve injury, oral aversion, thermal injury with laser use and airway obstruction — are uncommon but often poorly recorded.4 Lingual frenotomy for reasons other than latching difficulty is not supported by current evidence, nor is division of other oral ties in infants The relationship of ankyloglossia to later articulation, gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnea remains uncertain, and frenotomy for these conditions is therefore not indicated.5 Frenulum of the upper lip is normal and not clearly related to breastfeeding.4 If needed for orthodontics, labial frenotomy should not precede eruption of permanent dentition. Buccal ties have no functional significance.4

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Consensus Statement: Ankyloglossia in Children.

          To identify and seek consensus on issues and controversies related to ankyloglossia and upper lip tie in children by using established methodology for American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery clinical consensus statements.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment of Ankyloglossia for Reasons Other Than Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Re-thinking lactation-related nipple pain and damage

              Nipple pain is a common reason for premature cessation of breastfeeding. Despite the benefits of breastfeeding for both infant and mother, clinical support for problems such as maternal nipple pain remains a research frontier. Maternal pharmaceutical treatments, and infant surgery and bodywork interventions are commonly recommended for lactation-related nipple pain without evidence of benefit. The pain is frequently attributed to mammary dysbiosis, candidiasis, or infant anatomic anomaly (including to diagnoses of posterior or upper lip-tie, high palate, retrognathia, or subtle cranial nerve abnormalities). Although clinical protocols universally state that improved fit and hold is the mainstay of treatment of nipple pain and wounds, the biomechanical parameters of pain-free fit and hold remain an omitted variable bias in almost all clinical breastfeeding research. This article reviews the research literature concerning aetiology, classification, prevention, and management of lactation-related nipple–areolar complex (NAC) pain and damage. Evolutionary and complex systems perspectives are applied to develop a narrative synthesis of the heterogeneous and interdisciplinary evidence elucidating nipple pain in breastfeeding women. Lactation-related nipple pain is most commonly a symptom of inflammation due to repetitive application of excessive mechanical stretching and deformational forces to nipple epidermis, dermis and stroma during milk removal. Keratinocytes lock together when mechanical forces exceed desmosome yield points, but if mechanical loads continue to increase, desmosomes may rupture, resulting in inflammation and epithelial fracture. Mechanical stretching and deformation forces may cause stromal micro-haemorrhage and inflammation. Although the environment of the skin of the nipple–areolar complex is uniquely conducive to wound healing, it is also uniquely exposed to environmental risks. The two key factors that both prevent and treat nipple pain and inflammation are, first, elimination of conflicting vectors of force during suckling or mechanical milk removal, and second, elimination of overhydration of the epithelium which risks moisture-associated skin damage. There is urgent need for evaluation of evidence-based interventions for the elimination of conflicting intra-oral vectors of force during suckling.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                CMAJ
                CMAJ
                9711805
                CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
                CMA Impact Inc.
                0820-3946
                1488-2329
                10 October 2023
                10 October 2023
                : 195
                : 39
                : E1349
                Affiliations
                Department of Family Medicine (Anderson), Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa; The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus (Anderson), Ottawa, Ont.; Maple Kidz Clinic (Prabhu), Vaughan, Ont.; Department of Pediatrics (Prabhu), Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Otolaryngology (Graham), Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University; London Health Sciences Centre (Graham), London, Ont.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: M. Elise Graham, elise.graham@ 123456lhsc.on.ca
                Article
                195e1349
                10.1503/cmaj.230151
                10610957
                37816524
                19b1ac2d-303a-43a2-9328-b171260f4191
                © 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                Categories
                Practice
                Five Things to Know about …

                Comments

                Comment on this article