0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and Evaluation of a Digital HIV Risk Assessment Tool Incorporated Within an App-Based Self-Testing Program

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

          Background:

          Low-risk perception is an important barrier to the utilization of HIV services. In this context, offering an online platform for people to assess their risk of HIV and inform their decision to test can be impactful in increasing testing uptake. Using secondary data from the HIVSmart! quasirandomized trial, we aimed to identify predictors of HIV, develop a risk staging model for South African township populations, and validate it in combination with the HIVSmart! digital self-testing program.

          Setting:

          Townships in Cape Town, South Africa.

          Methods:

          Using Bayesian predictive projection, we identified predictors of HIV and constructed a risk assessment model that we validated in external data.

          Results:

          Our analyses included 3095 participants from the HIVSmart! trial. We identified a model of 5 predictors (being unmarried, HIV testing history, having had sex with a partner living with HIV, dwelling situation, and education) that performed best during external validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 89% credible intervals: 0.71, 0.68 to 0.72). The sensitivity of our HIV risk staging model was 91.0% (89.1% to 92.7%) and the specificity was 13.2% (8.5% to 19.8%) but increased when combined with a digital HIV self-testing program, the specificity was 91.6% (95.9% to 96.4%) and sensitivity remained similar at 90.9% (89.1% to 92.6%).

          Conclusions:

          This is the first validated digital HIV risk assessment tool developed for South African township populations and the first study to evaluate the added value of a risk assessment tool with an app-based HIV self-testing program. Study findings are relevant for application of digital programs to improve utilization of HIV testing services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Welcome to the Tidyverse

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations inR

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls

              Most studies have some missing data. Jonathan Sterne and colleagues describe the appropriate use and reporting of the multiple imputation approach to dealing with them
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr
                J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr
                qai
                Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999)
                JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
                1525-4135
                1944-7884
                15 August 2023
                08 May 2023
                : 93
                : 5
                : 387-394
                Affiliations
                Departments of [a ]Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health; and
                [b ]Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
                [c ]Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and
                [d ]Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Division of Pulmonology, UCT Lung Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Nitika Pant Pai, MD, MPH, PhD, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, 5252 boul de Maisonneuve Ouest, Montreal, QC, Canada H4A 3S5 (e-mail: nitika.pai@ 123456mcgill.ca ).
                Article
                QAIV22898 00006
                10.1097/QAI.0000000000003210
                10337312
                37155969
                19aa920b-d251-4f08-b856-e1445923ddbd
                Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 26 August 2022
                : 03 April 2023
                Categories
                Implementation Science
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                hiv,risk score,risk assessment tool,south africa,bayesian
                hiv, risk score, risk assessment tool, south africa, bayesian

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Most referenced authors870