18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes after three different surgical treatments for resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: a short-term randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          A preferable surgical treatment for patients with conservative therapy-resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder is still a matter of debate. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare short-term clinical and radiological results of three surgical treatment options for these patients.

          Methods

          A multicenter randomized trial was conducted. Sixty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive 1. subacromial decompression (Group SAD), 2. debridement of calcifications (Group D), or 3. debridement of calcifications with SAD (Group D + SAD). Stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. The primary outcome was an improvement in VAS for pain (pVAS) 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were an improvement in pVAS 6 weeks postoperatively, functional outcomes (CMS, DASH, ASES), radiological outcome, additional treatments, and complications.

          Results

          The improvement in pVAS was significant in all groups ( p < 0.001) and did not differ between the groups after 6 months. Six weeks postoperatively, the improvement in pVAS was significantly ( p = 0.03) less in Group SAD compared to Group D + SAD (16.5 mm, SD 19.3 mm vs 33.1 mm, SD 19.7 mm, respectively). The mean size of calcifications decreased significantly in all groups ( p < 0.0001). In Group SAD, the size of the calcifications decreased less ( p = 0.04) compared to Group D and Group D + SAD after 6 weeks. Group SAD received more additional treatments ( p = 0.003) compared to Group D + SAD (9 vs 1), which were mainly subacromial cortisone injections.

          Conclusions

          All patient groups showed significant pain relief and an improvement in shoulder function 6 months after surgery. However, patients in Group SAD showed inferior pain relief and less improvement in DASH score after 6 weeks. Furthermore, this group required more postoperative additional treatments. No significant differences in clinical and radiological outcomes were observed between patients in Group D compared to Group D + SAD. Therefore, an arthroscopic debridement without subacromial decompression seems to be advisable for patients with therapy-resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder.

          Level of evidence 2, Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial.

          IRB METC Zuyderland MC. Number: 14-T-112.

          Registered at trialregister.nl NL 4947.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG)

          This paper describes the development of an evaluative outcome measure for patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions. The goal is to produce a brief, self-administered measure of symptoms and functional status, with a focus on physical function, to be used by clinicians in daily practice and as a research tool. This is a joint initiative of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS), the Council of Musculoskeletal Specialty Societies (COMSS), and the Institute for Work and Health (Toronto, Ontario). Our approach is consistent with previously described strategies for scale development. In Stage 1, Item Generation, a group of methodologists and clinical experts reviewed 13 outcome measurement scales currently in use and generated a list of 821 items. In Stage 2a, Initial Item Reduction, these 821 items were reduced to 78 items using various strategies including removal of items which were generic, repetitive, not reflective of disability, or not relevant to the upper extremity or to one of the targeted concepts of symptoms and functional status. Items not highly endorsed in a survey of content experts were also eliminated. Stage 2b, Further Item Reduction, will be based on results of field testing in which patients complete the 78-item questionnaire. This field testing, which is currently underway in 20 centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia, will generate the final format and content of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Future work includes plans for validity and reliability testing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Calcific Tendinopathy of the Rotator Cuff: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management.

              Calcific tendinopathy, or calcifying tendinitis, is a disease characterized by multifocal, cell-mediated calcification of living tissue. After spontaneous disappearance of the calcific deposits or, less frequently, surgical removal, the tendon reconstitutes itself. Attention to the clinical presentation and the radiologic, morphologic, and gross characteristics of the calcium deposit will facilitate differentiation between the formative phase and the resorptive phase, which is of paramount importance in the management of this disease. Should conservative treatment fail, surgical removal may be indicated during the formative phase, but only under exceptional circumstances during the resorptive phase. Aspiration and lavage of the deposit should be performed only during the latter phase.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                f.verstraelen@zuyderland.nl
                Journal
                J Orthop Surg Res
                J Orthop Surg Res
                Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1749-799X
                5 November 2022
                5 November 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 480
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopedics, Zuyderland MC, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard, Limburg The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.5012.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0481 6099, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, School of Care and Public Health Research Institute, , Maastricht University, ; Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, Limburg The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Orthopedics, Viecuri MC, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL Venlo, Limburg The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1451-3766
                Article
                3373
                10.1186/s13018-022-03373-1
                9636666
                36335393
                197d1093-db2e-4426-b705-8a129ee146d7
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 1 September 2022
                : 23 October 2022
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Surgery
                calcifying tendinitis,shoulder,debridement,subacromial decompression,surgical treatment
                Surgery
                calcifying tendinitis, shoulder, debridement, subacromial decompression, surgical treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article