15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intra and post-operative complications observed with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the complications which were associated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) versus the conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPE).

          Methods

          Commonly used search databases, specifically MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, and http://www.clinicaltrials.gov were carefully searched for English publications comparing FLACS versus CPE. The selected endpoints which were assessed included incomplete capsulotomy, anterior capsulotomy tag, anterior capsule tear, posterior capsule tear, injury to the descemet’s membrane, zonular dialysis, vitreous loss, macular or corneal edema, and elevated intra-ocular pressure. Statistical analysis was carried out by the latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.3) and represented by risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

          Results

          A total number of 7156 participants were included. Three thousand five hundred and fifty four (3554) participants were assigned to the FLACS group. The risks for incomplete capsulotomy, anterior capsulotomy tag, and anterior capsular tear were significantly higher with FLACS (RR: 22.42, 95% CI: 4.53–110.82; P = 0.0001), (RR: 33.07, 95% CI: 6.53–167.56; P = 0.0001) and (RR: 4.74, 95% CI: 2.59–8.68; P = 0.00001) respectively. The risks for macular/corneal edema (RR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.18–3.55; P = 0.01) and elevated intra-ocular pressure (RR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.55–6.78; P = 0.002) were also significantly higher with FLACS. However, the risks for impaired descemet’s membrane (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.61–1.47; P = 0.80), zonular dialysis (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.06–2.72; P = 0.35), vitreous loss (RR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01–1.63; P = 0.10) and posterior capsular tear (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.23–9.16; P = 0.69) were not significantly different.

          Conclusions

          The current results showed that FLACS did not improve intra/post-operative complications in comparison to CPE. Further larger studies should confirm this hypothesis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficacy and Safety of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Compared with Manual Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of 14 567 Eyes.

          To investigate the efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) relative to manual cataract surgery (MCS).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery: outcomes and safety in more than 4000 cases at a single center.

            To compare the intraoperative complications and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Femtosecond laser versus manual clear corneal incision in cataract surgery.

              To compare functional and morphological outcomes of femtosecond laser clear corneal incision (CCI) versus manual CCI during cataract surgery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +8618107168286 , oculist498474@163.com
                64964747@qq.com
                395300060@qq.com
                287740@qq.com
                50231474@qq.com
                565227656@qq.com
                Journal
                BMC Ophthalmol
                BMC Ophthalmol
                BMC Ophthalmology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2415
                9 August 2019
                9 August 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 177
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1758 3193, GRID grid.490204.b, Department of Ophthalmology, , Jingzhou Central Hospital, ; Jingzhou, Hubei China
                [2 ]Department of Cataract, Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital, Wuhan, China
                Article
                1190
                10.1186/s12886-019-1190-2
                6688351
                31399070
                191d1890-4cc4-412a-9081-7861b07a9637
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 April 2019
                : 31 July 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery,conventional phacoemulsification surgery,post-operative complications

                Comments

                Comment on this article