8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “Just too busy living in the moment and surviving”: barriers to accessing health care for structurally vulnerable populations at end-of-life

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite access to quality care at the end-of-life (EOL) being considered a human right, it is not equitable, with many facing significant barriers. Most research examines access to EOL care for homogenous ‘normative’ populations, and as a result, the experiences of those with differing social positioning remain unheard. For example, populations experiencing structural vulnerability, who are situated along the lower rungs of social hierarchies of power (e.g., poor, homeless) will have unique EOL care needs and face unique barriers when accessing care. However, little research examines these barriers for people experiencing life-limiting illnesses and structural vulnerabilities. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to accessing care among structurally vulnerable people at EOL.

          Methods

          Ethnography informed by the critical theoretical perspectives of equity and social justice was employed. This research drew on 30 months of ethnographic data collection (i.e., observations, interviews) with structurally vulnerable people, their support persons, and service providers. Three hundred hours of observation were conducted in homes, shelters, transitional housing units, community-based service centres, on the street, and at health care appointments. The constant comparative method was used with data collection and analysis occurring concurrently.

          Results

          Five significant barriers to accessing care at EOL were identified, namely: (1) The survival imperative; (2) The normalization of dying; (3) The problem of identification; (4) Professional risk and safety management; and (5) The cracks of a ‘silo-ed’ care system. Together, findings unveil inequities in accessing care at EOL and emphasize how those who do not fit the ‘normative’ palliative-patient population type, for whom palliative care programs and policies are currently built, face significant access barriers.

          Conclusions

          Findings contribute a nuanced understanding of the needs of and barriers experienced by those who are both structurally vulnerable and facing a life-limiting illness. Such insights make visible gaps in service provision and provide information for service providers, and policy decision-makers alike, on ways to enhance the equitable provision of EOL care for all populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity.

          Intersectionality theory, developed to address the non-additivity of effects of sex/gender and race/ethnicity but extendable to other domains, allows for the potential to study health and disease at different intersections of identity, social position, processes of oppression or privilege, and policies or institutional practices. Intersectionality has the potential to enrich population health research through improved validity and greater attention to both heterogeneity of effects and causal processes producing health inequalities. Moreover, intersectional population health research may serve to both test and generate new theories. Nevertheless, its implementation within health research to date has been primarily through qualitative research. In this paper, challenges to incorporation of intersectionality into population health research are identified or expanded upon. These include: 1) confusion of quantitative terms used metaphorically in theoretical work with similar-sounding statistical methods; 2) the question of whether all intersectional positions are of equal value, or even of sufficient value for study; 3) distinguishing between intersecting identities, social positions, processes, and policies or other structural factors; 4) reflecting embodiment in how processes of oppression and privilege are measured and analysed; 5) understanding and utilizing appropriate scale for interactions in regression models; 6) structuring interaction or risk modification to best convey effects, and; 7) avoiding assumptions of equidistance or single level in the design of analyses. Addressing these challenges throughout the processes of conceptualizing and planning research and in conducting analyses has the potential to improve researchers' ability to more specifically document inequalities at varying intersectional positions, and to study the potential individual- and group-level causes that may drive these observed inequalities. A greater and more thoughtful incorporation of intersectionality can promote the creation of evidence that is directly useful in population-level interventions such as policy changes, or that is specific enough to be applicable within the social contexts of affected communities. Copyright © 2014 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Structural vulnerability and health: Latino migrant laborers in the United States.

            Latino immigrants in the United States constitute a paradigmatic case of a population group subject to structural violence. Their subordinated location in the global economy and their culturally depreciated status in the United States are exacerbated by legal persecution. Medical Anthropology, Volume 30, Numbers 4 and 5, include a series of ethnographic analyses of the processes that render undocumented Latino immigrants structurally vulnerable to ill health. We hope to extend the social science concept of "structural vulnerability" to make it a useful concept for health care. Defined as a positionality that imposes physical/emotional suffering on specific population groups and individuals in patterned ways, structural vulnerability is a product of class-based economic exploitation and cultural, gender/sexual, and racialized discrimination, as well as complementary processes of depreciated subjectivity formation. A good-enough medicalized recognition of the condition of structural vulnerability offers a tool for developing practical therapeutic resources. It also facilitates political alternatives to the punitive neoliberal policies and discourses of individual unworthiness that have become increasingly dominant in the United States since the 1980s. Copyright © 2011 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk factors for congestive heart failure in US men and women: NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study.

              The incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF) has been increasing steadily in the United States during the past 2 decades. We studied risk factors for CHF and their corresponding attributable risk in the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. A total of 13 643 men and women without a history of CHF at baseline examination were included in this prospective cohort study. Risk factors were measured using standard methods between 1971 and 1975. Incidence of CHF was assessed using medical records and death certificates obtained between 1982 and 1984 and in 1986, 1987, and 1992. During average follow-up of 19 years, 1382 CHF cases were documented. Incidence of CHF was positively and significantly associated with male sex (relative risk [RR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.39; P<.001; population attributable risk [PAR], 8.9%), less than a high school education (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.42; P =.01; PAR, 8.9%), low physical activity (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38; P<.001; PAR, 9.2%), cigarette smoking (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.39-1.83; P<.001; PAR, 17.1%), overweight (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12-1.52; P =.001; PAR, 8.0%), hypertension (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.59; P<.001; PAR, 10.1%), diabetes (RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.51-2.28; P<.001; PAR, 3.1%), valvular heart disease (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.17-1.82; P =.001; PAR, 2.2%), and coronary heart disease (RR, 8.11; 95% CI, 6.95-9.46; P<.001; PAR, 61.6%). Male sex, less education, physical inactivity, cigarette smoking, overweight, diabetes, hypertension, valvular heart disease, and coronary heart disease are all independent risk factors for CHF. More than 60% of the CHF that occurs in the US general population might be attributable to coronary heart disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +1 (250) 721-7487 , kis@uvic.ca
                mollison@uvic.ca
                giesbrec@uvic.ca
                rmcneil@cfenet.ubc.ca
                bpauly@uvic.ca
                Sheryl.Kirkham@twu.ca
                dosanin@smh.ca
                barclay@uvic.ca
                gshowler@coolaid.org
                caitem@shaw.ca
                Kristen.Kvakic@avi.org
                danicagleave@gmail.com
                taylor.teal@avi.org
                caelin@shaw.ca
                carolyn.showler@gmail.com
                krounds@uvic.ca
                Journal
                BMC Palliat Care
                BMC Palliat Care
                BMC Palliative Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-684X
                26 January 2019
                26 January 2019
                2019
                : 18
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9465, GRID grid.143640.4, Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, , University of Victoria, ; 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2 Canada
                [2 ]BC Centre on Substance Use, 608–1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6 Canada
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, GRID grid.17091.3e, Department of Medicine, , University of British Columbia, ; 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9465, GRID grid.143640.4, School of Nursing, , University of Victoria, ; 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2 Canada
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9465, GRID grid.143640.4, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, , University of Victoria, ; 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2 Canada
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9062 8563, GRID grid.265179.e, School of Nursing, , Trinity Western University, ; 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1 Canada
                [7 ]Inner City Health Associates, 59 Adelaide St. E, Toronto, ON M5C 1K6 Canada
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9465, GRID grid.143640.4, School of Social Work, , University of Victoria, ; 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2 Canada
                [9 ]Victoria Cool Aid Community Health Centre, 1st Floor, Access Health Centre, 713 Johnson Street, Victoria, BC V8W 1M8 Canada
                [10 ]AIDS Vancouver Island, 713 Johnson St, Victoria, BC V8W 1M8 Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2381-4712
                Article
                396
                10.1186/s12904-019-0396-7
                6348076
                30684959
                19042cdc-2357-4fde-b875-d33697d7412b
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 January 2018
                : 18 January 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
                Award ID: 133578
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                access to care,structural vulnerability,homelessness,eol care,health equity,ethnographic methods,canada

                Comments

                Comment on this article