3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Considerations for simultaneous testing of COVID-19 and tuberculosis in high-burden countries

      discussion

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic has severely disrupted tuberculosis control efforts and services, particularly in countries with a high burden of tuberculosis.1, 2 Resources dedicated to identifying and treating tuberculosis have been diverted to the COVID-19 response, with direct effects on tuberculosis programmes. Similarly, measures to prevent COVID-19 transmission, such as lockdowns, have made it harder for people to access tuberculosis testing and care. As a result, 2020 saw a drastic decline in the global number of people who were newly diagnosed and treated for tuberculosis and an increase in deaths from tuberculosis for the first time in more than a decade. 2 Simultaneous and integrated testing for COVID-19 and tuberculosis is an approach that could improve the detection of both diseases, help to close the gap in tuberculosis diagnosis left by the pandemic, and optimise the use of testing resources in resource-constrained settings. 3 COVID-19 and tuberculosis are two infectious diseases that overlap in terms of their common symptoms (cough and fever) and risk factors for infection and complications. People and communities susceptible to tuberculosis are also likely to be at greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to overlapping sociodemographic factors, such as crowded living spaces and comorbidities like malnutrition and diabetes. Coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and tuberculosis is also associated with poor outcomes: studies indicate that people with tuberculosis have a substantially greater risk of death from COVID-19 than those without tuberculosis.4, 5 A further concern is that reduced immunity and lung inflammation from COVID-19, and the effects of corticosteroids used to treat COVID-19, might lead to the progression of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection to symptomatic disease or the worsening of active tuberculosis. 6 Access to diagnostic testing for COVID-19 and tuberculosis is an essential first step in the care cascade to reduce the transmission of both diseases and appropriately manage those affected by them. Consequently, there is a rationale for improving access to testing for COVID-19 and tuberculosis through the implementation of simultaneous testing, particularly in countries with a high burden of tuberculosis, to mitigate the impact of the ongoing pandemic on tuberculosis services and identify people who might be at high risk from both diseases. Several countries have trialled simultaneous testing strategies for COVID-19 and tuberculosis during the pandemic, including Indonesia, 7 South Africa, 8 Nigeria, 9 and India. 10 Notably, India's Ministry of Health and Family Welfare issued a rapid response plan to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis control efforts in September, 2020, which included COVID-19 screening for all patients diagnosed with tuberculosis and tuberculosis screening for all patients with confirmed COVID-19. 10 FIND, the global alliance for diagnostics, have been working to address the paucity of diagnostics for tuberculosis and COVID-19 across low-income and middle-income countries. As part of these efforts, FIND have supported two simultaneous testing initiatives in India. The first, in partnership with the Confluence for Health Action and Transformation Foundation, is supplementing the reach and effectiveness of the COVID-19 response at five high-volume tertiary hospitals in Mumbai. The project enables the provision of rapid, onsite Truenat (Molbio Diagnostics; Verna, India) PCR testing for those who test negative for SARS-CoV-2 on rapid antigen tests but have symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 or tuberculosis, aiding patient management and the identification of COVID-19 and tuberculosis hotspots. The second is being conducted in India's private health-care sector via the Joint Effort for Elimination of Tuberculosis (JEET), which is an innovative initiative for tuberculosis that connects private health-care facilities, laboratories, and medical practitioners with the national public health programme to improve access to affordable tuberculosis diagnostics and treatment. The JEET teams have worked to sensitise private sector health-care providers to tuberculosis and COVID-19 testing guidelines and key activities have included (1)establishing linkages for simultaneous testing in eligible patients with presumptive tuberculosis across private health facilities, (2) providing education on tuberculosis and COVID-19 diagnostic services and guidelines under the public sector, and (3) educating patients with tuberculosis of COVID-19-related precautions and symptoms. These experiences in India have shown the value of simultaneous COVID-19 and tuberculosis testing, in terms of increasing access to diagnostics, and that operational workflows for COVID-19 and tuberculosis testing can work harmoniously when combined. Challenges encountered during the implementation of simultaneous testing largely related to shortages of staff and personal protective equipment, which at times limited the screening of patients at hospitals and in the field. Informed by FIND's experiences in India, we have outlined key topics for countries considering the implementation of simultaneous testing, divided into policy, operational, and technical considerations (appendix). Several research gaps exist around simultaneous testing. In particular, the development of integrated COVID-19 and tuberculosis tests (ie, those that can be done on one platform with the same sample) would help to streamline and increase the cost-efficiency of simultaneous testing. Other key areas that require further investigation include the evaluation of optimal settings for simultaneous testing (eg, in the community or a facility) and the diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of simultaneous testing (ie, the extent to which simultaneous testing of COVID-19 and tuberculosis enables the diagnosis of both conditions, and the relative costs and benefits of the intervention). Future efforts should also include the adaptation and validation of COVID-19 symptom screening apps, which consider factors such as geography, age, and risk profile, for use in tuberculosis diagnosis, and research into the optimal sampling strategy for COVID-19 and tuberculosis testing (eg, tongue swabs or saliva). To conclude, although the COVID-19 pandemic might have set back progress in tuberculosis testing and care, there is an opportunity to leverage the innovations in mass testing implemented as part of the pandemic response to close tuberculosis testing gaps and help to control the transmission of both diseases. The implementation of innovative simultaneous testing strategies for tuberculosis and COVID-19 could improve access to testing among populations at greatest risk for both diseases, and early simultaneous testing efforts suggest that the approach is feasible. The considerations shared here, informed by simultaneous testing projects in India, can provide a starting point for countries to design operational research projects to assess the impact of simultaneous testing guidelines for tuberculosis and COVID-19. Future work on the outlined research gaps would also be valuable to provide further evidence for these policies and bring about the development of integrated simultaneous testing for COVID-19 and tuberculosis. All authors are employees of FIND. FIND received grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria for the simultaneous testing efforts from which this Comment draws the lessons learned. FIND is co-convenor of the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator Diagnostics Pillar along with The Global Fund. We declare no other competing interests. Writing support was provided by Talya Underwood of Anthos Communications, UK, and was funded by FIND according to Good Publication Practice guidelines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Risk factors for COVID-19 death in a population cohort study from the Western Cape Province, South Africa

          Abstract Background Risk factors for COVID-19 death in sub-Saharan Africa and the effects of HIV and tuberculosis on COVID-19 outcomes are unknown. Methods We conducted a population cohort study using linked data from adults attending public sector health facilities in the Western Cape, South Africa. We used Cox-proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, location and comorbidities to examine the association between HIV, tuberculosis and COVID-19 death from 1 March-9 June 2020 among (i) public sector “active patients” (≥1 visit in the 3 years before March 2020), (ii) laboratory-diagnosed COVID-19 cases and (iii) hospitalized COVID-19 cases. We calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for COVID-19 comparing HIV positive vs. negative adults using modelled population estimates. Results Among 3,460,932 patients (16% HIV positive), 22,308 were diagnosed with COVID-19, of whom 625 died. COVID-19 death was associated with male sex, increasing age, diabetes, hypertension and chronic kidney disease. HIV was associated with COVID-19 mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-2.70), with similar risks across strata of viral load and immunosuppression. Current and previous tuberculosis were associated with COVID-19 death (aHR [95%CI] 2.70 [1.81-4.04] and 1.51 [1.18-1.93] respectively). The SMR for COVID-19 death associated with HIV was 2.39 (95%CI 1.96-2.86); population attributable fraction 8.5% (95%CI 6.1-11.1). Conclusion While our findings may over-estimate HIV- and tuberculosis-associated COVID-19 mortality risks due to residual confounding, both HIV and current tuberculosis were independently associated with increased COVID-19 mortality. The associations between age, sex and other comorbidities and COVID-19 mortality were similar to other settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Previous and active tuberculosis increases risk of death and prolongs recovery in patients with COVID-19

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Corticosteroids for COVID-19 Therapy: Potential Implications on Tuberculosis

              On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization announced the Corona Virus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) as a global pandemic, which originated in China. At the host level, COVID-19, caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), affects the respiratory system, with the clinical symptoms ranging from mild to severe or critical illness that often requires hospitalization and oxygen support. There is no specific therapy for COVID-19, as is the case for any common viral disease except drugs to reduce the viral load and alleviate the inflammatory symptoms. Tuberculosis (TB), an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), also primarily affects the lungs and has clinical signs similar to pulmonary SARS-CoV-2 infection. Active TB is a leading killer among infectious diseases and adds to the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. In immunocompetent individuals, primary Mtb infection can also lead to a non-progressive, asymptomatic latency. However, latent Mtb infection (LTBI) can reactivate symptomatic TB disease upon host immune-suppressing conditions. Importantly, the diagnosis and treatment of TB are hampered and admixed with COVID-19 control measures. The US-Center for Disease Control (US-CDC) recommends using antiviral drugs, Remdesivir or corticosteroid (CST), such as dexamethasone either alone or in-combination with specific recommendations for COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization or oxygen support. However, CSTs can cause immunosuppression, besides their anti-inflammatory properties. The altered host immunity during COVID-19, combined with CST therapy, poses a significant risk for new secondary infections and/or reactivation of existing quiescent infections, such as LTBI. This review highlights CST therapy recommendations for COVID-19, various types and mechanisms of action of CSTs, the deadly combination of two respiratory infectious diseases COVID-19 and TB. It also discusses the importance of screening for LTBI to prevent TB reactivation during corticosteroid therapy for COVID-19.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Lancet Glob Health
                Lancet Glob Health
                The Lancet. Global Health
                The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                2214-109X
                2 February 2022
                2 February 2022
                Affiliations
                [a ]FIND, Campus Biotech, Geneva 1202, Switzerland
                [b ]FIND, New Delhi, India
                Article
                S2214-109X(22)00002-X
                10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00002-X
                8809899
                35122718
                18f96c01-2857-421f-978c-06a931bdb16a
                © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Comment

                Comments

                Comment on this article