55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Satisfaction is the one of the most frequently reported outcome measures for quality of care. Assessment of satisfaction with maternity services is crucial, and psychometrically sound measures are needed if this is to inform health practices. This paper comparatively reviews current measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth.

          Methods

          A review of the literature was conducted. Studies were located through computerised databases and hand searching references of identified articles and reviews. Inclusion criteria were that the questionnaire was a multi-item scale of satisfaction with care during labour and birth, and some form of psychometric information (either information about questionnaire construction, or reliability, or validity) had to be reported.

          Results

          Nine questionnaires of satisfaction with care during labour and birth were identified. Instruments varied in psychometric properties and dimensions. Most described questionnaire construction and tested some form of reliability and validity. Measures were generally not based on the main theoretical models of satisfaction and varied in scope and application to different types of samples (e.g. satisfaction following caesarean section). For an in-depth measure of satisfaction with intrapartum care, the Intrapartal-Specific Quality from the Patient’s Perspective questionnaire (QPP-I) is recommended. Brief measures with good reliability and validity are provided by the Six Simple Questions (SSQ) or Perceptions of Care Adjective Checklist (PCACL-R).

          Conclusions

          Despite the interest in measures of satisfaction there are only a small number of validated measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth. It is important that brief, reliable and valid measures are available for use in general and specific populations in order to assist research and inform practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts.

          This review presents issues arising from an analysis of over 100 papers published in the field of patient satisfaction. The published output appearing in the medical and nursing literature which incorporated the term "patient satisfaction" rose to a peak of over 1000 papers annually in 1994, reflecting changes in service management especially in the U.K. and U.S.A. over the past decade. An introductory section discusses the setting and measurement of patient satisfaction within this wider context of changes in service delivery. Various models are examined that have attempted to define and interpret the idea of determining individual perceptions of the quality of health care delivered. Determinants of satisfaction are examined in relation to the literature on expectations, and demographic and psychosocial variables. These are distinguished from the multidimensional components of satisfaction as aspects of the delivery of care, identified by many authors. The review highlights the complexity and breadth of the literature in this field, the existence of which is often not acknowledged by researchers presenting the findings of studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample.

              A woman's dissatisfaction with the experience of labor and birth may affect her emotional well-being and willingness to have another baby. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of a negative birth experience in a national sample. A longitudinal cohort study of 2541 women recruited from all antenatal clinics in Sweden during 3 weeks spread over 1 year was conducted. Data were collected by three questionnaires, which measured women's global experience of labor and birth 1 year after the birth, and obtained information on possible risk factors during pregnancy and 2 months after the birth. Seven percent of the women had a negative birth experience. The following risk factors were found: (1) factors related to unexpected medical problems, such as emergency operative delivery, induction, augmentation of labor, and infant transfer to neonatal care; (2) factors related to the woman's social life, such as unwanted pregnancy and lack of support from partner; (3) factors related to the woman's feelings during labor, such as pain and lack of control; and (4) factors that may be easier to influence by the caregivers, such as insufficient time allocated to the woman's own questions at antenatal checkups, lack of support during labor, and administration of obstetric analgesia. Many risk factors were related to unexpected medical problems and participants' social background. Of the established methods to improve women's birth experience, childbirth education and obstetric analgesia seemed to be less effective, whereas support in labor and listening to the woman's own issues may be underestimated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central
                1471-2393
                2013
                8 May 2013
                : 13
                : 108
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, UK
                [2 ]School of Health Sciences, City University London, 20 Bartholomew Close, London, UK
                [3 ]Jane Abbott, Bliss (The Special Care Baby Charity), 9 Holyrood Street, London, UK
                [4 ]Gillian Gyte, National Childbirth Trust, Alexandra House, Oldham Terrace, London, UK
                [5 ]Heike Rabe, Academic Department of Paediatrics, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Royal Alexandra Children’s Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, UK
                [6 ]Lelia Duley, Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
                Article
                1471-2393-13-108
                10.1186/1471-2393-13-108
                3659073
                23656701
                18cc6c08-c517-47bf-a2fa-846168f6ea45
                Copyright ©2013 Sawyer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 3 December 2012
                : 2 May 2013
                Categories
                Research Article

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                patient satisfaction,labour,birth,questionnaire,measurement
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                patient satisfaction, labour, birth, questionnaire, measurement

                Comments

                Comment on this article