34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19) in Humans: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A growing body of literature on the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is becoming available, but a synthesis of available data has not been conducted. We performed a scoping review of currently available clinical, epidemiological, laboratory, and chest imaging data related to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, Scopus and LILACS from 01 January 2019 to 24 February 2020. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted using the clinical and laboratory data, and random-effects models were applied to estimate pooled results. A total of 61 studies were included (59,254 patients). The most common disease-related symptoms were fever (82%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 56%–99%; n = 4410), cough (61%, 95% CI 39%–81%; n = 3985), muscle aches and/or fatigue (36%, 95% CI 18%–55%; n = 3778), dyspnea (26%, 95% CI 12%–41%; n = 3700), headache in 12% (95% CI 4%–23%, n = 3598 patients), sore throat in 10% (95% CI 5%–17%, n = 1387) and gastrointestinal symptoms in 9% (95% CI 3%–17%, n = 1744). Laboratory findings were described in a lower number of patients and revealed lymphopenia (0.93 × 10 9/L, 95% CI 0.83–1.03 × 10 9/L, n = 464) and abnormal C-reactive protein (33.72 mg/dL, 95% CI 21.54–45.91 mg/dL; n = 1637). Radiological findings varied, but mostly described ground-glass opacities and consolidation. Data on treatment options were limited. All-cause mortality was 0.3% (95% CI 0.0%–1.0%; n = 53,631). Epidemiological studies showed that mortality was higher in males and elderly patients. The majority of reported clinical symptoms and laboratory findings related to SARS-CoV-2 infection are non-specific. Clinical suspicion, accompanied by a relevant epidemiological history, should be followed by early imaging and virological assay.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

          Summary Background A recent cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, was caused by a novel betacoronavirus, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). We report the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and treatment and clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods All patients with suspected 2019-nCoV were admitted to a designated hospital in Wuhan. We prospectively collected and analysed data on patients with laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing. Data were obtained with standardised data collection forms shared by WHO and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium from electronic medical records. Researchers also directly communicated with patients or their families to ascertain epidemiological and symptom data. Outcomes were also compared between patients who had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and those who had not. Findings By Jan 2, 2020, 41 admitted hospital patients had been identified as having laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection. Most of the infected patients were men (30 [73%] of 41); less than half had underlying diseases (13 [32%]), including diabetes (eight [20%]), hypertension (six [15%]), and cardiovascular disease (six [15%]). Median age was 49·0 years (IQR 41·0–58·0). 27 (66%) of 41 patients had been exposed to Huanan seafood market. One family cluster was found. Common symptoms at onset of illness were fever (40 [98%] of 41 patients), cough (31 [76%]), and myalgia or fatigue (18 [44%]); less common symptoms were sputum production (11 [28%] of 39), headache (three [8%] of 38), haemoptysis (two [5%] of 39), and diarrhoea (one [3%] of 38). Dyspnoea developed in 22 (55%) of 40 patients (median time from illness onset to dyspnoea 8·0 days [IQR 5·0–13·0]). 26 (63%) of 41 patients had lymphopenia. All 41 patients had pneumonia with abnormal findings on chest CT. Complications included acute respiratory distress syndrome (12 [29%]), RNAaemia (six [15%]), acute cardiac injury (five [12%]) and secondary infection (four [10%]). 13 (32%) patients were admitted to an ICU and six (15%) died. Compared with non-ICU patients, ICU patients had higher plasma levels of IL2, IL7, IL10, GSCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα. Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection caused clusters of severe respiratory illness similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and was associated with ICU admission and high mortality. Major gaps in our knowledge of the origin, epidemiology, duration of human transmission, and clinical spectrum of disease need fulfilment by future studies. Funding Ministry of Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China

            Abstract Background Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients. Methods We extracted data regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China through January 29, 2020. The primary composite end point was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of mechanical ventilation, or death. Results The median age of the patients was 47 years; 41.9% of the patients were female. The primary composite end point occurred in 67 patients (6.1%), including 5.0% who were admitted to the ICU, 2.3% who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, and 1.4% who died. Only 1.9% of the patients had a history of direct contact with wildlife. Among nonresidents of Wuhan, 72.3% had contact with residents of Wuhan, including 31.3% who had visited the city. The most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%). Diarrhea was uncommon (3.8%). The median incubation period was 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 7). On admission, ground-glass opacity was the most common radiologic finding on chest computed tomography (CT) (56.4%). No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 patients (17.9%) with nonsevere disease and in 5 of 173 patients (2.9%) with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was present in 83.2% of the patients on admission. Conclusions During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness. Patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings. (Funded by the National Health Commission of China and others.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019

              Summary In December 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause was linked to a seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China. A previously unknown betacoronavirus was discovered through the use of unbiased sequencing in samples from patients with pneumonia. Human airway epithelial cells were used to isolate a novel coronavirus, named 2019-nCoV, which formed a clade within the subgenus sarbecovirus, Orthocoronavirinae subfamily. Different from both MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, 2019-nCoV is the seventh member of the family of coronaviruses that infect humans. Enhanced surveillance and further investigation are ongoing. (Funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the National Major Project for Control and Prevention of Infectious Disease in China.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                30 March 2020
                April 2020
                : 9
                : 4
                : 941
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University Hospital and School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 30130-100, Brazil; israeljbn@ 123456ufmg.br (I.J.B.d.N.); smangeon@ 123456gmail.com (S.M.M.G.); milenamarc@ 123456gmail.com (M.S.M.)
                [2 ]Cochrane Croatia, University of Split School of Medicine, Split 21000, Croatia; nensi.cacic@ 123456yahoo.com (N.C.); ana.marusic@ 123456mefst.hr (A.M.); ajeronci@ 123456mefst.hr (A.J.); tinapoklepovic@ 123456gmail.com (T.P.P.); izakarijagrkovic@ 123456yahoo.com (I.Z.-G.)
                [3 ]Department of Sport and Health Science, Technische Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany; dr.hebatullah.mohamed@ 123456gmail.com
                [4 ]Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
                [5 ]Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 00700, Sri Lanka; umeshe.jaya@ 123456gmail.com
                [6 ]School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia; Ishanka.Weerasekara@ 123456uon.edu.au
                [7 ]Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
                [8 ]Cochrane Iran Associate Centre, National Institute for Medical Research Development, Tehran 16846, Iran; meysam.abdar@ 123456gmail.com (M.A.E.); ahmad.pub@ 123456gmail.com (A.S.-M.)
                [9 ]Cochrane Brazil, Evidence-Based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04021-001, Brazil; vinicius_civile@ 123456yahoo.com.br
                [10 ]Cochrane Brazil, Universidade Paulista, São Paulo 04057-000, Brazil; nelson.carvas96@ 123456gmail.com
                [11 ]Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada; robertobragazzi@ 123456gmail.com
                [12 ]Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, SE-221-00 Lund, Sweden; maria.bjorklund@ 123456med.lu.se
                [13 ]Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA; tujjarmd@ 123456hotmail.com
                [14 ]The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia; mtian@ 123456georgeinstitute.org.cn
                [15 ]The George Institute for Global Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100088, China
                [16 ]Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China; maria-d18@ 123456hotmail.com
                [17 ]Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; omathuna.6@ 123456osu.edu
                [18 ]School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, D04V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: thilo.vongroote@ 123456uni-muenster.de ; Tel.: +49-1520-2000320
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5240-0493
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4529-7114
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0398-5197
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8195-5057
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6082-9169
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1718-6281
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6272-0917
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-5062
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3618-6017
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8409-868X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-1297
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-0823
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1979-9214
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-3771
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5331-3340
                Article
                jcm-09-00941
                10.3390/jcm9040941
                7230636
                32235486
                18c8a821-812c-4145-84a1-6c2fa09b30cb
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 05 March 2020
                : 23 March 2020
                Categories
                Review

                novel coronavirus,sars-cov-2,covid-19,scoping review,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content203

                Cited by217

                Most referenced authors5,192