20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative transcriptomics of Diuraphis noxia and Schizaphis graminum fed wheat plants containing different aphid-resistance genes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The molecular bases of aphid virulence to aphid crop plant resistance genes are poorly understood. The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia, (Kurdjumov), and the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), are global pest of cereal crops. Each species damages barley, oat, rye and wheat, but S. graminum includes fescue, maize, rice and sorghum in its host range. This study was conducted to compare and contrast the transcriptomes of S. graminum biotype I and D. noxia biotype 1 when each ingested phloem from leaves of varieties of bread wheat, Triticum aestivum L., containing no aphid resistance ( Dn0), resistance to D. noxia biotype 1 ( Dn4), or resistance to both D. noxia biotype 1 and S. graminum biotype I ( Dn7, wheat genotype 94M370). Gene ontology enrichments, k-means analysis and KEGG pathway analysis indicated that 94M370 plants containing the Dn7 D. noxia resistance gene from rye had stronger effects on the global transcriptional profiles of S. graminum and D. noxia relative to those fed Dn4 plants. S. graminum responds to ingestion of phloem sap from 94M370 plants by expression of unigenes coding for proteins involved in DNA and RNA repair, and delayed tissue and structural development. In contrast, D. noxia displays a completely different transcriptome after ingesting phloem sap from Dn4 or 94M370 plants, consisting of unigenes involved primarily in detoxification, nutrient acquisition and structural development. These variations in transcriptional responses of D. noxia and S. graminum suggest that the underlying evolutionary mechanism(s) of virulence in these aphids are likely species specific, even in cases of cross resistance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fitness costs associated with insecticide resistance.

          Insects are exposed to a variety of stress factors in their environment, and, in many cases for insect pests to agriculture, those factors include toxic chemical insecticides. Coping with the toxicity of insecticides can be costly and requires energy and resource allocation for adaptation and survival. Several behavioural, physiological and genetic mechanisms are used by insects to handle toxic insecticides, sometimes leading to resistance by constitutive overexpression of detoxification enzymes or inducing mutations in the target sites. Such actions are costly and may affect reproduction, impair dispersal ability and have several other effects on the insect's fitness. Fitness costs resulting from resistance to insecticides has been reported in many insects from different orders, and several examples are given in this mini-review. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Species identification of aphids (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae) through DNA barcodes.

            A 658-bp fragment of mitochondrial DNA from the 5' region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 (COI) gene has been adopted as the standard DNA barcode region for animal life. In this study, we test its effectiveness in the discrimination of over 300 species of aphids from more than 130 genera. Most (96%) species were well differentiated, and sequence variation within species was low, averaging just 0.2%. Despite the complex life cycles and parthenogenetic reproduction of aphids, DNA barcodes are an effective tool for identification. © 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Compatible plant-aphid interactions: how aphids manipulate plant responses.

              To access phloem sap, aphids have developed a furtive strategy, their stylets progressing towards sieve tubes mainly through the apoplasmic compartment. Aphid feeding requires that they overcome a number of plant responses, ranging from sieve tube occlusion and activation of phytohormone-signalling pathways to expression of anti-insect molecules. In addition to bypassing plant defences, aphids have been shown to affect plant primary metabolism, which could be a strategy to improve phloem sap composition in nutrients required for their growth. During compatible interactions, leading to successful feeding and reproduction, aphids cause alterations in their host plant, including morphological changes, modified resource allocation and various local as well as systemic symptoms. Repeated salivary secretions injected from the first probe in the epidermal tissue up to ingestion of sieve-tube sap may play a crucial role in the compatibility between the aphid and the plant. Copyright 2010 Académie des sciences. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Validation
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                22 May 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 5
                : e0233077
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America
                [2 ] Stored Product Insect and Engineering Unit, USDA-ARS Centerfor Grain and Animal Health Research, Manhattan, KS, United States of America
                [3 ] Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America
                [4 ] Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America
                [5 ] SAGE University, Indore, India
                CSIRO, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-2338
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-2163
                Article
                PONE-D-19-24276
                10.1371/journal.pone.0233077
                7313535
                32442185
                18c879d7-01f9-41e0-aaca-76bfc799d5e4

                This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 28 August 2019
                : 26 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 10, Pages: 33
                Funding
                Funded by: Kansas Wheat Commission
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by the Kansas Wheat Alliance and the Kansas State Agricultural Experiment Station and awarded to CMS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Grasses
                Wheat
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Metabolism
                Metabolic Processes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Insects
                Aphids
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Computational Biology
                Genome Analysis
                Transcriptome Analysis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Genome Analysis
                Transcriptome Analysis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Metabolism
                Metabolic Pathways
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Computational Biology
                Genome Analysis
                Gene Ontologies
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Genome Analysis
                Gene Ontologies
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Biosynthesis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Metabolism
                Protein Metabolism
                Custom metadata
                All transcripts containing protein coding genes have been submitted to NCBI’s Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly database. The entire transcriptome assembly containing both coding and non-coding genes has been deposited in USDA’s Ag Data Commons at https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/de-novo-transcriptome-assembly-schizaphis-gramium-biotype-i-feeding-wheat and an annotated assembly of the transcripts that code for proteins is available at NCBI’s Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly (TSA) database under the accession GIML00000000. Partial mitochondrial sequences for COI that were used to confirm the taxonomic identity of each aphid species are deposited in GenBank under MT011383 for S. graminum I and MN994435 for D. noxia biotype 1.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content268

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors790