2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on PhD candidates’ study progress and study wellbeing

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The qualitative content analysis process.

          This paper is a description of inductive and deductive content analysis. Content analysis is a method that may be used with either qualitative or quantitative data and in an inductive or deductive way. Qualitative content analysis is commonly used in nursing studies but little has been published on the analysis process and many research books generally only provide a short description of this method. When using content analysis, the aim was to build a model to describe the phenomenon in a conceptual form. Both inductive and deductive analysis processes are represented as three main phases: preparation, organizing and reporting. The preparation phase is similar in both approaches. The concepts are derived from the data in inductive content analysis. Deductive content analysis is used when the structure of analysis is operationalized on the basis of previous knowledge. Inductive content analysis is used in cases where there are no previous studies dealing with the phenomenon or when it is fragmented. A deductive approach is useful if the general aim was to test a previous theory in a different situation or to compare categories at different time periods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected

              The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in school closures and distancing requirements that have disrupted both work and family life for many. Concerns exist that these disruptions caused by the pandemic may not have influenced men and women researchers equally. Many medical journals have published papers on the pandemic, which were generated by researchers facing the challenges of these disruptions. Here we report the results of an analysis that compared the gender distribution of authors on 1893 medical papers related to the pandemic with that on papers published in the same journals in 2019, for papers with first authors and last authors from the United States. Using mixed-effects regression models, we estimated that the proportion of COVID-19 papers with a woman first author was 19% lower than that for papers published in the same journals in 2019, while our comparisons for last authors and overall proportion of women authors per paper were inconclusive. A closer examination suggested that women’s representation as first authors of COVID-19 research was particularly low for papers published in March and April 2020. Our findings are consistent with the idea that the research productivity of women, especially early-career women, has been affected more than the research productivity of men.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Higher Education Research & Development
                Higher Education Research & Development
                Informa UK Limited
                0729-4360
                1469-8366
                April 28 2022
                : 1-14
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
                [2 ]Centre for Higher and Adult Education, Faculty of Education, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
                [3 ]School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
                Article
                10.1080/07294360.2022.2063816
                18c37a91-182f-4d48-a4b9-da88bf360087
                © 2022

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article