New species of Asclepias (Apocynaceae), Baphia (Leguminosae), Cochlospermum (Bixaceae) and Endostemon (Lamiaceae) from the Kalahari sands of Angola and NW Zambia, with one new combination in Vangueria (Rubiaceae)
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Four new species are described from central and eastern Angola and adjacent NW Zambia.
All occur in Kalahari sand savannas rich in endemic and more widely distributed geoxylic
suffrutices. Despite being known from very few collections, the conservation status
of one of these new species is assessed as Least Concern, as these grasslands are
nutrient-poor, are in remote sparsely populated areas, and are not threatened with
conversion to agriculture. The remaining three are treated as Data Deficient. In addition,
one new combination is provided for
Ancylanthosrubiginosus Desf. under
Vangueria as
V.rubiginosa (Desf.) Lantz is an illegitimate later homonym. We also make orthographic corrections
to specific epithets commemorating Ilse von Nolde, a collector who made important
collections from Quela in Malange in the 1930s.
Background Understanding the patterns of biodiversity distribution and what influences them is a fundamental pre-requisite for effective conservation and sustainable utilisation of biodiversity. Such knowledge is increasingly urgent as biodiversity responds to the ongoing effects of global climate change. Nowhere is this more acute than in species-rich tropical Africa, where so little is known about plant diversity and its distribution. In this paper, we use RAINBIO – one of the largest mega-databases of tropical African vascular plant species distributions ever compiled – to address questions about plant and growth form diversity across tropical Africa. Results The filtered RAINBIO dataset contains 609,776 georeferenced records representing 22,577 species. Growth form data are recorded for 97% of all species. Records are well distributed, but heterogeneous across the continent. Overall, tropical Africa remains poorly sampled. When using sampling units (SU) of 0.5°, just 21 reach appropriate collection density and sampling completeness, and the average number of records per species per SU is only 1.84. Species richness (observed and estimated) and endemism figures per country are provided. Benin, Cameroon, Gabon, Ivory Coast and Liberia appear as the botanically best-explored countries, but none are optimally explored. Forests in the region contain 15,387 vascular plant species, of which 3013 are trees, representing 5–7% of the estimated world’s tropical tree flora. The central African forests have the highest endemism rate across Africa, with approximately 30% of species being endemic. Conclusions The botanical exploration of tropical Africa is far from complete, underlining the need for intensified inventories and digitization. We propose priority target areas for future sampling efforts, mainly focused on Tanzania, Atlantic Central Africa and West Africa. The observed number of tree species for African forests is smaller than those estimated from global tree data, suggesting that a significant number of species are yet to be discovered. Our data provide a solid basis for a more sustainable management and improved conservation of tropical Africa’s unique flora, and is important for achieving Objective 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011–2020. In turn, RAINBIO provides a solid basis for a more sustainable management and improved conservation of tropical Africa’s unique flora. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0356-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.