Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perioperative and extended outcomes of patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair following cystectomy and ileal conduit

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To report perioperative and long-term postoperative outcomes of cystectomy patients with ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion undergoing parastomal hernia (PSH) repair.

          Method

          We reviewed patients who underwent cystectomy and IC diversion between 2003 and 2022 in our center. Baseline variables, including surgical approach of PSH repair and repair technique, were captured. Multivariable Cox regressionanalysis was performed to test for the associations between different variables and PSH recurrence.

          Results

          Thirty-six patients with a median (IQR) age of 79 (73–82) years were included. The median time between cystectomy and PSH repair was 30 (14–49) months. Most PSH repairs (32/36, 89%) were performed electively, while 4 were due to small bowel obstruction. Hernia repairs were performed through open (n=25), robotic (10), and laparoscopic approaches (1). Surgical techniques included direct repair with mesh (20), direct repair without mesh (4), stoma relocation with mesh (5), and stomarelocation without mesh (7). The 90-day complication rate was 28%. In a median follow-up of 24 (7–47) months, 17 patients (47%) had a recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 9 (7–24) months. On multivariable analysis, 90-day complication following PSH repair was associated with an increased risk of recurrence.

          Conclusions

          In this report of one of the largest series of PSH repair in the Urology literature, 47% of patients had a recurrence following hernia repair with a median follow-up time of 2 years. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates when comparing repair technique or the use of open or minimally invasive approaches.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-024-05123-w.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The global burden of urinary bladder cancer: an update

          Bladder cancer is among the top ten most common cancer types in the world, with approximately 550,000 new cases annually. The highest burden of bladder cancer is currently falling on most developed communities across the globe. But with an anticipated shift in world demographics with growing and aging populations mainly on the African continent, and important shifts in exposure to different risk factors across the world, this is likely to change over the next decades. In this review, we provide an overview of the current incidence, mortality, prevalence, survival, risk factors and costs of bladder cancer worldwide.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Parastomal hernia.

              Parastomal hernia following formation of an ileostomy or colostomy is common. This article reviews the incidence of hernia, the technical factors related to the construction of the stoma that may influence the incidence, and the success of the different methods of repair. A literature search using the Medline database was performed to locate English language articles on parastomal hernia. Further articles were obtained from the references cited in the literature initially reviewed. Parastomal hernia affects 1.8-28.3 per cent of end ileostomies, and 0-6.2 per cent of loop ileostomies. Following colostomy formation, the rates are 4.0-48.1 and 0-30.8 per cent respectively. Site of stoma formation (through or lateral to rectus abdominis), trephine size, fascial fixation and closure of lateral space are not proven to affect the incidence of hernia. The role of extraperitoneal stoma construction is uncertain. Mesh repair gives a lower rate of recurrence (0-33.3 per cent) than direct tissue repair (46-100 per cent) or stoma relocation (0-76.2 per cent). The incidence of parastomal hernia is between 0 and 48.1 per cent, depending on the type of stoma and length of follow-up. No technical factors related to the construction of the stoma have been shown to prevent herniation. If repair is required, a prosthetic mesh technique should be considered. Further randomized clinical trials (particularly of extraperitoneal stoma construction) are needed. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hoomanj@yahoo.com
                Journal
                World J Urol
                World J Urol
                World Journal of Urology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0724-4983
                1433-8726
                12 August 2024
                12 August 2024
                2024
                : 42
                : 1
                : 482
                Affiliations
                Urology Department, University of Southern California, ( https://ror.org/03taz7m60) Los Angeles, CA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-3556
                Article
                5123
                10.1007/s00345-024-05123-w
                11319381
                39133311
                186e93f5-656f-42de-98eb-0b897a8ed54a
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 5 March 2024
                : 10 June 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Southern California
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

                Urology
                abdominal hernia,cystectomy,herniorrhaphy,surgical mesh,urinary diversion
                Urology
                abdominal hernia, cystectomy, herniorrhaphy, surgical mesh, urinary diversion

                Comments

                Comment on this article