0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Outcome of rare primary malignant bone sarcoma (RPMBS) treated with multimodal therapy: Results from the EUROpean Bone Over 40 Sarcoma Study (EURO‐B.O.S.S)

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Rare primary malignant bone sarcomas (RPMBS) account for 5%–10% of primary high‐grade bone tumors and represent a major treatment challenge. The outcome of patients with RPMBS enrolled in the EUROpean Bone Over 40 Sarcoma Study (EURO‐B.O.S.S) is presented.

          Methods

          Inclusion criteria were as follows: age from 41 to 65 years and a diagnosis of high‐grade spindle cell, pleomorphic, or vascular RPMBS. The chemotherapy regimen included doxorubicin 60 mg/m 2, ifosfamide 9 g/m 2, and cisplatin 90 mg/m 2; postoperative methotrexate 8 g/m 2 was added in case of a poor histologic response. Version 2.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Kaplan–Meier curves, log‐rank tests, and univariate Cox regression models were used.

          Results

          In total, 113 patients were evaluable for analysis. The median patient age was 52 years (range, 40–66 years), and 67 patients were men. Eighty‐eight tumors were categorized as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS), 20 were categorized as leiomyosarcomas, three were categorized as fibrosarcomas, and two were categorized as angiosarcomas. Eighty‐three of 113 tumors were located in the extremities. Ninety‐five of 113 patients presented with no evidence of metastases. After a median follow‐up of 6.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.5–9.8 years), the 5‐year overall survival rate for patients with localized disease was 68.4% (IQR, 56.9%–77.5%), and it was 71.7% (IQR, 58.1%–81.6%) for patients with UPS and 54.9% (IQR, 29.5%–74.5%) for patients with leiomyosarcoma. Grade III–IV hematologic toxicity was reported in 81% patients; 23% had grade II–III neurotoxicity, and 37.5% had grade I–II nephrotoxicity. Five‐year overall survival was significantly better for patients with localized disease, for patients who obtained surgical complete remission, and when the primary tumor was located in the extremities.

          Conclusions

          The survival of patients who had RPMBS in the current series was similar to that of age‐matched patients who had high‐grade osteosarcoma treated according to the same protocol. An osteosarcoma‐like chemotherapy may be proposed in patients who have RPMBS.

          Abstract

          Rare and ultra‐rare primary malignant bone sarcomas, namely, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas, leiomyosarcomas, fibrosarcomas and angiosarcomas, are usually diagnosed in adult and elderly patients and represent a treatment challenge. This study demonstrates that a clinical trial might be run within a European network in the setting of rare cancers and that a combination of surgery and age‐adjusted osteosarcoma regimen might be proposed for these patients, possibly representing a benchmark for future histology‐driven approaches.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Final Results of a Randomized Trial From Italian (ISG), Spanish (GEIS), French (FSG), and Polish (PSG) Sarcoma Groups

          To determine whether the administration of histology-tailored neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HT) was superior to the administration of standard anthracycline plus ifosfamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy (A+I) in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of an extremity or the trunk wall. This was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial. Patients had localized high-risk STS (grade 3; size, ≥ 5 cm) of an extremity or trunk wall, belonging to one of the following five histologic subtypes: high-grade myxoid liposarcoma (HG-MLPS); leiomyosarcoma (LMS), synovial sarcoma (SS), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive three cycles of A+I or HT. The HT regimens were as follows: trabectedin in HG-MLPS; gemcitabine plus dacarbazine in LMS; high-dose prolonged-infusion ifosfamide in SS; etoposide plus ifosfamide in MPNST; and gemcitabine plus docetaxel in UPS. Primary and secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using Cox models adjusted for treatment and stratification factors. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01710176 ). Between May 2011 and May 2016, 287 patients (UPS: n = 97 [33.8%]; HG-MLPS: n = 65 [22.6%]; SS: n = 70 [24.4%]; MPNST: n = 27 [9.4%]; and LMS: n = 28 [9.8%]) were randomly assigned to either A+I or HT. At the final analysis, with a median follow-up of 52 months, the projected DFS and OS probabilities were 0.55 and 0.47 (log-rank P = .323) and 0.76 and 0.66 (log-rank P = .018) at 60 months in the A+I arm and HT arm, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were observed. In a population of patients with localized high-risk STS, HT was not associated with a better DFS or OS, suggesting that A+I should remain the regimen to choose whenever neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used in patients with high-risk STS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Ultra‐rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society community of experts on the incidence threshold and the list of entities

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, or doxorubicin alone as a first‐line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma: A propensity score matching analysis from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Cancer
                Cancer
                Wiley
                0008-543X
                1097-0142
                August 02 2023
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Osteoncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas, and Innovative Therapies IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy
                [2 ] Sarcoma Center Helios Klinikum Berlin‐Buch Berlin Germany
                [3 ] Department of Oncology The Norwegian Radium Hospital Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
                [4 ] Adult Mesenchymal Tumor Medical Oncology Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milan Italy
                [5 ] Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group Klinikum Stuttgart–Olgahospital Stuttgart Germany
                [6 ] SC Oncologia Azienda Sanitaria Locale “Città di Torino” Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco Torino Turin Italy
                [7 ] University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
                [8 ] Department of Hematology and Oncology University Hospital Münster Munster Germany
                [9 ] Department of Programming and Monitoring IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico RizzolI Bologna Italy
                [10 ] Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
                [11 ] Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway
                [12 ] Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden
                [13 ] Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
                [14 ] Orthopedic Oncology IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico RizzolI Bologna Italy
                [15 ] Division of Cancer Medicine and Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
                Article
                10.1002/cncr.34964
                1867f3e9-bee9-4c46-a9c7-6526eedf5cda
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article