51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Leflunomide is equally efficacious and safe compared to low dose rituximab in refractory rheumatoid arthritis given in combination with methotrexate: results from a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The standard dose of rituximab used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is 1000 mg but recent studies have shown that low dose (500 mg) is also effective. Efficacy of low dose rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to first-line non-biologic Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs), compared to leflunomide is unknown. In a tertiary care referral setting, we conducted a randomized, double blind controlled clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab-methotrexate combination with leflunomide-methotrexate combination.

          Methods

          Patients on methotrexate (10-20 mg/week) with a Disease Activity Score (DAS) > 3.2 were randomly assigned to rituximab (500 mg on days 1 and 15) or leflunomide (10-20 mg/day). The primary end-point was ACR20 at 24 weeks. Sample of 40 had 70% power to detect a 30% difference. ACR50, ACR70, DAS, EULAR good response, CD3 + (T cell), CD19 + (B cell) and CD19 + CD27+ (memory B cell) counts, tetanus and pneumococcal antibody levels were secondary end points.

          Results

          Baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups. At week 24, ACR20 was 85% vs 84% ( p = 0.93), ACR50 was 60% vs. 64% ( p = 0.79) and ACR70 was 35% vs 32% ( P = 0.84), in rituximab and in leflunomide groups respectively. Serious adverse events were similar.

          With rituximab there was significant reduction in B cells ( p < 0.001), memory B cells ( p < 0.001) and pneumococcal antibody levels ( P < 0.05) without significant changes in T cells ( p = 0.835) and tetanus antibody levels ( p = 0.424) at 24 weeks. With leflunomide, significant reduction in memory B cells ( p < 0.01) and pneumococcal antibody levels ( p < 0.01) occurred without significant changes in B cells ( P > 0.05), T cells ( P > 0.05) or tetanus antibody levels ( P > 0.05).

          Conclusions

          Leflunomide-methotrexate combination is as efficacious as low-dose rituximab-methotrexate combination at 24 weeks, in RA patient’s refractory to initial DMARDs. The high responses seen in both groups have favorable cost implications for patients in developing countries. Changes in immune parameters with leflunomide are novel and need further characterization.

          Trial registration

          The trial was registered with the Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry (SLCTR), a publicly accessible primary registry linked to the registry network of the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the WHO (WHO-ICTRP) (registration number: SLCTR/2008/008 dated 16th May 2008).

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

          The revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were formulated from a computerized analysis of 262 contemporary, consecutively studied patients with RA and 262 control subjects with rheumatic diseases other than RA (non-RA). The new criteria are as follows: 1) morning stiffness in and around joints lasting at least 1 hour before maximal improvement; 2) soft tissue swelling (arthritis) of 3 or more joint areas observed by a physician; 3) swelling (arthritis) of the proximal interphalangeal, metacarpophalangeal, or wrist joints; 4) symmetric swelling (arthritis); 5) rheumatoid nodules; 6) the presence of rheumatoid factor; and 7) radiographic erosions and/or periarticular osteopenia in hand and/or wrist joints. Criteria 1 through 4 must have been present for at least 6 weeks. Rheumatoid arthritis is defined by the presence of 4 or more criteria, and no further qualifications (classic, definite, or probable) or list of exclusions are required. In addition, a "classification tree" schema is presented which performs equally as well as the traditional (4 of 7) format. The new criteria demonstrated 91-94% sensitivity and 89% specificity for RA when compared with non-RA rheumatic disease control subjects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis

            The revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were formulated from a computerized analysis of 262 contemporary, consecutively studied patients with RA and 262 control subjects with rheumatic diseases other than RA (non-RA). The new criteria are as follows: 1) morning stiffness in and around joints lasting at least 1 hour before maximal improvement; 2) soft tissue swelling (arthritis) of 3 or more joint areas observed by a physician; 3) swelling (arthritis) of the proximal interphalangeal, metacarpophalangeal, or wrist joints; 4) symmetric swelling (arthritis); 5) rheumatoid nodules; 6) the presence of rheumatoid factor; and 7) radiographic erosions and/or periarticular osteopenia in hand and/or wrist joints. Criteria 1 through 4 must have been present for at least 6 weeks. Rheumatoid arthritis is defined by the presence of 4 or more criteria, and no further qualifications (classic, definite, or probable) or list of exclusions are required. In addition, a "classification tree" schema is presented which performs equally as well as the traditional (4 of 7) format. The new criteria demonstrated 91-94% sensitivity and 89% specificity for RA when compared with non-RA rheumatic disease control subjects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

              An open-label study indicated that selective depletion of B cells with the use of rituximab led to sustained clinical improvements for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To confirm these observations, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. We randomly assigned 161 patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate to receive one of four treatments: oral methotrexate (> or =10 mg per week) (control); rituximab (1000 mg on days 1 and 15); rituximab plus cyclophosphamide (750 mg on days 3 and 17); or rituximab plus methotrexate. Responses defined according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) were assessed at week 24 (primary analyses) and week 48 (exploratory analyses). At week 24, the proportion of patients with 50 percent improvement in disease symptoms according to the ACR criteria, the primary end point, was significantly greater with the rituximab-methotrexate combination (43 percent, P=0.005) and the rituximab-cyclophosphamide combination (41 percent, P=0.005) than with methotrexate alone (13 percent). In all groups treated with rituximab, a significantly higher proportion of patients had a 20 percent improvement in disease symptoms according to the ACR criteria (65 to 76 percent vs. 38 percent, P< or =0.025) or had EULAR responses (83 to 85 percent vs. 50 percent, P< or =0.004). All ACR responses were maintained at week 48 in the rituximab-methotrexate group. The majority of adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion: at 24 weeks, serious infections occurred in one patient (2.5 percent) in the control group and in four patients (3.3 percent) in the rituximab groups. Peripheral-blood immunoglobulin concentrations remained within normal ranges. In patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment, a single course of two infusions of rituximab, alone or in combination with either cyclophosphamide or continued methotrexate, provided significant improvement in disease symptoms at both weeks 24 and 48. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                drharindu@gmail.com
                0094 112697483 , p.galappatthy@pharm.cmb.ac.lk
                nilhanrajivadesilva@yahoo.com
                s.seneviratne@ucl.ac.uk
                ushagowrysara@yahoo.com
                dappvr@yahoo.com
                melanie.hart@imperial.ac.uk
                p.kelleher@imperial.ac.uk
                upul@commed.cmb.edu.lk
                rohinifernandopule@hotmail.com
                lilani_weerasekara@yahoo.com
                lalithsw@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2474
                19 July 2017
                19 July 2017
                2017
                : 18
                : 310
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0556 2133, GRID grid.415398.2, Department of Rheumatology, , The National Hospital of Sri Lanka, ; Colombo, Sri Lanka
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000121828067, GRID grid.8065.b, Department of Pharmacology, , Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, ; Colombo, Sri Lanka
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8530 3182, GRID grid.415115.5, Department of immunology, , Medical Research Institute, ; Colombo, Sri Lanka
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, , Consultant and Professor in Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, ; London, UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000121828067, GRID grid.8065.b, Department of Surgery, , Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, ; Colombo, Sri Lanka
                [6 ]ISNI 0000000121828067, GRID grid.8065.b, Department of Zoology, , Faculty of Science, University of Colombo, ; Colombo, Sri Lanka
                [7 ]Immunology Section Imperial College, and Department of Infection & Immunity, London, UK
                [8 ]ISNI 0000000121828067, GRID grid.8065.b, Department of Community Medicine, , Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, ; Colombo, Sri Lanka
                [9 ]Department of Pharmacology, General Sir John Kotelawala Defense University, Colombo, Sri Lanka
                [10 ]ISNI 0000000121828067, GRID grid.8065.b, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, , Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, ; PO Box 271, Kynsey Road, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
                Article
                1673
                10.1186/s12891-017-1673-3
                5518147
                28724365
                18141e27-536e-4565-9a70-8769b145ccb8
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 29 November 2016
                : 13 July 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: The local agents of rituximab provided the study medications, some laboratory reagents and a study coordinator. The local agents of leflunomide provided study medications and matching placebo tablets
                Award ID: Not applicable
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Orthopedics
                rheumatoid arthritis,rituximab,leflunomide,clinical trial,biologic disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (dmards)

                Comments

                Comment on this article