9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nomenclature and diagnosis of seronegative coeliac disease and chronic non-coeliac enteropathies in adults: the Paris consensus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Differential diagnosis of villous atrophy (VA) without coeliac antibodies in adults includes seronegative coeliac disease (CD) and chronic enteropathies unrelated to gluten, ie. non-coeliac enteropathies (NCEs). There is currently no international consensus on the nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for these enteropathies. In this work, a Delphi process was conducted to address this diagnostic and clinical uncertainty.

          Design

          An international task force of 13 gastroenterologists from six countries was recruited at the 16th International Coeliac Disease Symposium, Paris, 2019. Between September 2019 and July 2021, a Delphi process was conducted through mail surveys to reach a consensus on which conditions to consider in the differential diagnosis of VA with negative coeliac serology and the clinical diagnostic approaches required for these conditions. A 70% agreement threshold was adopted.

          Results

          Chronic enteropathies characterised by VA and negative coeliac serology can be attributed to two main clinical scenarios: forms of CD presenting with negative serology, which also include seronegative CD and CD associated with IgA deficiency, and NCEs, with the latter recognising different underlying aetiologies. A consensus was reached on the diagnostic criteria for NCEs assisting clinicians in differentiating NCEs from seronegative CD. Although in adults seronegative CD is the most common aetiology in patients with VA and negative serology, discriminating between seronegative CD and NCEs is key to avoid unnecessary lifelong gluten-free diet, treat disease-specific morbidity and contrast poor long-term outcomes.

          Conclusion

          This paper describes the Paris consensus on the definitions and diagnostic criteria for seronegative CD and chronic NCEs in adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.

          Consensus methods such as the Delphi survey technique are being employed to help enhance effective decision-making in health and social care. The Delphi survey is a group facilitation technique, which is an iterative multistage process, designed to transform opinion into group consensus. It is a flexible approach, that is used commonly within the health and social sciences, yet little guidance exists to help researchers undertake this method of data collection. This paper aims to provide an understanding of the preparation, action steps and difficulties that are inherent within the Delphi. Used systematically and rigorously, the Delphi can contribute significantly to broadening knowledge within the nursing profession. However, careful thought must be given before using the method; there are key issues surrounding problem identification, researcher skills and data presentation that must be addressed. The paper does not claim to be definitive; it purports to act as a guide for those researchers who wish to exploit the Delphi methodology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coeliac disease

            Coeliac disease occurs in about 1% of people in most populations. Diagnosis rates are increasing, and this seems to be due to a true rise in incidence rather than increased awareness and detection. Coeliac disease develops in genetically susceptible individuals who, in response to unknown environmental factors, develop an immune response that is subsequently triggered by the ingestion of gluten. The disease has many clinical manifestations, ranging from severe malabsorption to minimally symptomatic or non-symptomatic presentations. Diagnosis requires the presence of duodenal villous atrophy, and most patients have circulating antibodies against tissue transglutaminase; in children, European guidelines allow a diagnosis without a duodenal biopsy provided that strict symptomatic and serological criteria are met. Although a gluten-free diet is an effective treatment in most individuals, a substantial minority develop persistent or recurrent symptoms. Difficulties adhering to a gluten-free diet have led to the development of non-dietary therapies, several of which are undergoing trials in human beings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Consensus methods for medical and health services research.

              Health providers face the problem of trying to make decisions in situations where there is insufficient information and also where there is an overload of (often contradictory) information. Statistical methods such as meta-analysis have been developed to summarise and to resolve inconsistencies in study findings--where information is available in an appropriate form. Consensus methods provide another means of synthesising information, but are liable to use a wider range of information than is common in statistical methods, and where published information is inadequate or non-existent these methods provide a means of harnessing the insights of appropriate experts to enable decisions to be made. Two consensus methods commonly adopted in medical, nursing, and health services research--the Delphi process and the nominal group technique (also known as the expert panel)--are described, together with the most appropriate situations for using them; an outline of the process involved in undertaking a study using each method is supplemented by illustrations of the authors' work. Key methodological issues in using the methods are discussed, along with the distinct contribution of consensus methods as aids to decision making, both in clinical practice and in health service development.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gut
                Gut
                gutjnl
                gut
                Gut
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0017-5749
                1468-3288
                November 2022
                8 June 2022
                : 71
                : 11
                : 2218-2225
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDipartimento di Medicina Interna e Terapia Medica , University of Pavia , Pavia, Italy
                [2 ] Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS, Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute , Pavia, Italy
                [3 ] departmentAcademic Unit of Gastroenterology , Royal Hallamshire Hospital , Sheffield, UK
                [4 ] Direzione Scientifica Centrale, Fondazione S. Maugeri, IRCCS , Pavia, Italy
                [5 ] Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara , Ferrara, Italy
                [6 ] Celiac Center and Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center Massachusetts General Hospital- Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [7 ] AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, University of Salerno , Baronissi, Italy
                [8 ] Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital , Tampere, Finland
                [9 ] departmentCeliac Disease Center, Department of Medicine , Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons , New York City, New York, USA
                [10 ] Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University , New York, New York, USA
                [11 ] The Celiac Center at BIDMC, Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [12 ] Université de Paris, Department of Gastroenterology, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin , Paris, France
                [13 ] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [14 ] Departments of Gastroenterology, Mid Central DHB, Palmerston Hospital, Palmerston North , Palmerston North, New Zealand
                [15 ] Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                [16 ] departmentDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences , University of Bologna , Bologna, Italy
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Annalisa Schiepatti, Maugeri Clinical Research Institutes IRCCS Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy; annalisa.schiepatti01@ 123456universitadipavia.it
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8493-7698
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-1145
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4030-3025
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-9090
                Article
                gutjnl-2021-326645
                10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326645
                9554081
                35676085
                17cc4983-a418-43c9-9fc9-222f6ffeedb8
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 November 2021
                : 02 May 2022
                Categories
                Coeliac Disease
                1506
                2312
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                small intestine,small intestinal biopsy,small bowel disease,malabsorption,coeliac disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article