10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Switching from one biologic to benralizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: An ANANKE study post hoc analysis

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Severe asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease driven by eosinophilic inflammation in the majority of cases. Despite biologic therapy patients may still be sub-optimally controlled, and the choice of the best biologic is a matter of debate. Indeed, switching between biologics is common, but no official guidelines are available and real-world data are limited.

          Materials and methods

          In this post hoc analysis of the Italian, multi-center, observational, retrospective study, ANANKE. Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab were divided in two groups based on history of previous biologic therapy (biologic-experienced [suboptimal response] vs naïve). Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics were collected in the 12 months prior to benralizumab treatment. Change over time in blood eosinophils, annualized exacerbation rate (AER), asthma control (ACT), lung function and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use following benralizumab initiation were collected in the two groups.

          Results

          A total of 147 biologic-naïve and 58 biologic-experienced (34 omalizumab, 19 mepolizumab, and 5 omalizumab-mepolizumab) patients were enrolled. Biologic-experienced patients were more likely to be atopic and have a higher AER despite more frequent OCS use. Similar reductions in AER (>90% in both groups), OCS use (≥49% reduction in dosage and ≥41% able to eliminate OCS), ACT improvement (≥7 points gained in 48 weeks) and lung function (≥300 mL of FEV 1 improvement in 48 weeks) were observed after benralizumab introduction within the two groups. There were no registered discontinuations of benralizumab for safety reasons.

          Conclusion

          In this post hoc analysis, patients who were switched to benralizumab because of suboptimal control with a previous biologic therapy were more likely to be atopic and more often treated with omalizumab. Benralizumab is effective in both naïve patients and those previously treated with a biologic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma.

          Severe or therapy-resistant asthma is increasingly recognised as a major unmet need. A Task Force, supported by the European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society, reviewed the definition and provided recommendations and guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of severe asthma in children and adults. A literature review was performed, followed by discussion by an expert committee according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach for development of specific clinical recommendations. When the diagnosis of asthma is confirmed and comorbidities addressed, severe asthma is defined as asthma that requires treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller and/or systemic corticosteroids to prevent it from becoming "uncontrolled" or that remains "uncontrolled" despite this therapy. Severe asthma is a heterogeneous condition consisting of phenotypes such as eosinophilic asthma. Specific recommendations on the use of sputum eosinophil count and exhaled nitric oxide to guide therapy, as well as treatment with anti-IgE antibody, methotrexate, macrolide antibiotics, antifungal agents and bronchial thermoplasty are provided. Coordinated research efforts for improved phenotyping will provide safe and effective biomarker-driven approaches to severe asthma therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control.

            Asthma guidelines indicate that the goal of treatment should be optimum asthma control. In a busy clinic practice with limited time and resources, there is need for a simple method for assessing asthma control with or without lung function testing. The objective of this article was to describe the development of the Asthma Control Test (ACT), a patient-based tool for identifying patients with poorly controlled asthma. A 22-item survey was administered to 471 patients with asthma in the offices of asthma specialists. The specialist's rating of asthma control after spirometry was also collected. Stepwise regression methods were used to select a subset of items that showed the greatest discriminant validity in relation to the specialist's rating of asthma control. Internal consistency reliability was computed, and discriminant validity tests were conducted for ACT scale scores. The performance of ACT was investigated by using logistic regression methods and receiver operating characteristic analyses. Five items were selected from regression analyses. The internal consistency reliability of the 5-item ACT scale was 0.84. ACT scale scores discriminated between groups of patients differing in the specialist's rating of asthma control (F = 34.5, P <.00001), the need for change in patient's therapy (F = 40.3, P <.00001), and percent predicted FEV(1) (F = 4.3, P =.0052). As a screening tool, the overall agreement between ACT and the specialist's rating ranged from 71% to 78% depending on the cut points used, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77. Results reinforce the usefulness of a brief, easy to administer, patient-based index of asthma control.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              MEDI-563, a humanized anti-IL-5 receptor alpha mAb with enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity function.

              Peripheral blood eosinophilia and lung mucosal eosinophil infiltration are hallmarks of bronchial asthma. IL-5 is a critical cytokine for eosinophil maturation, survival, and mobilization. Attempts to target eosinophils for the treatment of asthma by means of IL-5 neutralization have only resulted in partial removal of airway eosinophils, and this warrants the development of more effective interventions to further explore the role of eosinophils in the clinical expression of asthma. We sought to develop a novel humanized anti-IL-5 receptor alpha (IL-5Ralpha) mAb with enhanced effector function (MEDI-563) that potently depletes circulating and tissue-resident eosinophils and basophils for the treatment of asthma. We used surface plasmon resonance to determine the binding affinity of MEDI-563 to FcgammaRIIIa. Primary human eosinophils and basophils were used to demonstrate antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The binding epitope of MEDI-563 on IL-5Ralpha was determined by using site-directed mutagenesis. The consequences of MEDI-563 administration on peripheral blood and bone marrow eosinophil depletion was investigated in nonhuman primates. MEDI-563 binds to an epitope on IL-5Ralpha that is in close proximity to the IL-5 binding site, and it inhibits IL-5-mediated cell proliferation. MEDI-563 potently induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of both eosinophils (half-maximal effective concentration = 0.9 pmol/L) and basophils (half-maximal effective concentration = 0.5 pmol/L) in vitro. In nonhuman primates MEDI-563 depletes blood eosinophils and eosinophil precursors in the bone marrow. MEDI-563 might provide a novel approach for the treatment of asthma through active antibody-dependent cell-mediated depletion of eosinophils and basophils rather than through passive removal of IL-5. Copyright (c) 2010 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front. Med.
                Frontiers in Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-858X
                02 September 2022
                2022
                : 9
                : 950883
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
                [2] 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplantation, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Neurosciences, Siena University Hospital , Siena, Italy
                [3] 3Reparto di Pneumologia, P.O. Garbagnate Milanese , Garbagnate Milanese, MI, Italy
                [4] 4UO Pneumologia e Pneumologia Riabilitativa, ICS Maugeri, IRCCS Bari , Bari, Italy
                [5] 5Reparto di Pneumologia, Ospedale Ostuni , Ostuni, BR, Italy
                [6] 6Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, SSDDU Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica, Università degli Studi di Torino, AO Ordine Mauriziano Umberto I - Torino , Turin, Italy
                [7] 7Cattedra e Scuola di Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università di Foggia , Foggia, Italy
                [8] 8Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
                [9] 9Asthma and Allergy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital , Rozzano, MI, Italy
                [10] 10Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [11] 11UOSD Malattie Respiratorie “Federico II,” Ospedale Monaldi, AO Dei Colli , Naples, Italy
                [12] 12Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari , Cagliari, Italy
                [13] 13UOC Pneumologia e Fisiopatologia Respiratoria, AORN A. Cardarelli , Naples, Italy
                [14] 14Allergy and Immunology, Niguarda Hospital , Milan, Italy
                [15] 15Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università Magna Graecia , Catanzaro, Italy
                [16] 16Division of Respiratory Medicine , University Hospital “Tor Vergata,” Rome, Italy
                [17] 17Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine , University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” Rome, Italy
                [18] 18UOC Pneumologia, ULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana , Treviso, Italy
                [19] 19Fisiopatologia Respiratoria, Ospedale Generale Regionale, Ente Ecclesiastico “F. Miulli,” Acquaviva delle Fonti , BA, Italy
                [20] 20Department of Medicine, University of Verona , Verona, Italy
                [21] 21Allergy Unit and Asthma Center, Verona University Hospital , Verona, Italy
                [22] 22Immunoallergology Unit, Careggi University Hospital , Florence, Italy
                [23] 23Medineos Observational Research - An IQVIA Company , Modena, Italy
                [24] 24Medical Evidence R&I, AstraZeneca , Basiglio, MI, Italy
                [25] 25Medical Affairs R&I, AstraZeneca , Basiglio, MI, Italy
                [26] 26UOC Pneumologia, Ospedale “S. Valentino,” Montebelluna (TV) - AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana , Treviso, Italy
                [27] 27Department of Health Sciences and Pneumology, University of Milan, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII , Bergamo, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Amy Klion, National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States

                Reviewed by: Petros Bakakos, Athens Chest Hospital Sotiria, Greece; Thanai Pongdee, Mayo Clinic, United States

                *Correspondence: Cristiano Caruso, carusocristiano1@ 123456gmail.com

                These authors share last authorship

                This article was submitted to Pulmonary Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine

                Article
                10.3389/fmed.2022.950883
                9478391
                36117962
                17bf9a39-1148-40d4-8248-41a2a0faaf59
                Copyright © 2022 Caruso, Cameli, Altieri, Aliani, Bracciale, Brussino, Caiaffa, Canonica, Centanni, D’Amato, Del Giacco, De Michele, Pastorello, Pelaia, Rogliani, Romagnoli, Schino, Caminati, Vultaggio, Zullo, Rizzoli, Boarino, Vitiello, Menzella and Di Marco.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 May 2022
                : 10 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 47, Pages: 12, Words: 6988
                Categories
                Medicine
                Brief Research Report

                severe eosinophilic asthma,switch,benralizumab,observational,biologics

                Comments

                Comment on this article