15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Participatory research involving community engagement is considered the gold standard in Indigenous health research. However, it is sometimes unclear whether and how Indigenous communities are engaged in research that impacts them, and whether and how engagement is reported. Indigenous health research varies in its degree of community engagement from minimal involvement to being community-directed and led. Research led and directed by Indigenous communities can support reconciliation and reclamation in Canada and globally, however clearer reporting and understandings of community-led research is needed. This scoping review assesses (a) how and to what extent researchers are reporting community engagement in Indigenous health research in Atlantic Canada, and (b) what recommendations exist in the literature regarding participatory and community-led research.

          Methods

          Eleven databases were searched using keywords for Indigeneity, geographic regions, health, and Indigenous communities in Atlantic Canada between 2001-June 2020. Records were independently screened by two reviewers and were included if they were: peer-reviewed; written in English; health-related; and focused on Atlantic Canada. Data were extracted using a piloted data charting form, and a descriptive and thematic analysis was performed. 211 articles were retained for inclusion.

          Results

          Few empirical articles reported community engagement in all aspects of the research process. Most described incorporating community engagement at the project’s onset and/or during data collection; only a few articles explicitly identified as entirely community-directed or led. Results revealed a gap in reported capacity-building for both Indigenous communities and researchers, necessary for holistic community engagement. Also revealed was the need for funding bodies, ethics boards, and peer review processes to better facilitate participatory and community-led Indigenous health research.

          Conclusion

          As Indigenous communities continue reclaiming sovereignty over identities and territories, participatory research must involve substantive, agreed-upon involvement of Indigenous communities, with community-directed and led research as the ultimate goal.

          Related collections

          Most cited references119

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

            The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                27 July 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 7
                : e0255265
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
                [2 ] School of Arctic and Sub-Arctic Studies, Labrador Institute of Memorial University, Memorial University, Happy Valley-Goose Bay, Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada
                [3 ] Department of Anthropology, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada
                [4 ] Department of Integrated Studies in Education (DISE), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [5 ] Kellogg Health Sciences Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
                University of Birmingham, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5332-088X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2595-2345
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7989-2106
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3016-5298
                Article
                PONE-D-20-38099
                10.1371/journal.pone.0255265
                8315539
                34314455
                17984ab8-2152-4b34-b2a2-a6076b60664e
                © 2021 Murphy et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 3 December 2020
                : 13 July 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Pages: 28
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
                Award ID: NEH-160643
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001804, Canada Research Chairs;
                Award Recipient :
                Author Initials: AC, LJM, ML, DM; Grant #: NEH-160643; Program: CIHR Operating Grant: Network Environments for Indigenous Health Research - Development Grants; Name of Funder: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); URL of CIHR: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html The funders did not play a role in study design, data collection, and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript. Author initials: DM; Name of Funder: Government of Canada, Canada Research Chairs; Program Title: Canada Research Chair, Tier II Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Peoples' Health and Well-Being; URL: https://www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/home-accueil-eng.aspx The funders did not play a role in study design, data collection, and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Social Sciences
                Anthropology
                Indigenous Populations
                People and Places
                Demography
                Indigenous Populations
                Science Policy
                Research Integrity
                Research Ethics
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                North America
                Canada
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Peer Review
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Database and Informatics Methods
                Database Searching
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Science Policy
                Research Funding
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content215

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors1,846