20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Novel Technique of Uniportal Endoscopic Interlaminar Contralateral Approach for Coexisting L5-S1 Lateral Recess, Foraminal, and Extraforaminal Stenosis and Its Clinical Outcomes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Multifocal intra-and-extraspinal lumbar stenotic lesions could be decompressed with one endoscopic surgical approach, which has the advantages of functional structure preservation, technical efficacy, and safety. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 48 patients who underwent uniportal endoscopic contralateral approach due to coexisting lateral recess, foraminal, and extraforaminal stenosis at the L5-S1 level. Foraminal stenosis grade and postoperative dysesthesia (POD) were analyzed. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and MacNab criteria for evaluating pain disability and response were analyzed. Results: The foraminal stenosis grade of the treated spinal levels was grade 1 ( n = 16, 33%), grade 2 ( n = 20, 42%), and grade 3 ( n = 12, 25%). The rate of occurrence of POD grade 2 and above, which may be related to intraoperative dorsal root ganglion (DRG) retraction injury, was revealed to be 4.2% (two with grade 2, none with grade 3). The patients showed favorable clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Uniportal endoscopic interlaminar contralateral approach is an effective procedure to resolve combined stenosis (lateral recess, foraminal, and extraforaminal region) with one surgical approach at the L5-S1 level. It may be a minimal DRG retracting and facet joint preserving procedure in foraminal and extraforaminal decompression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.

          The quality of a disability scale should dictate when it is used. The purposes of this study were to examine the validity of a global rating of change as a reflection of meaningful change in patient status and to compare the measurement properties of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OSW) and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QUE). Sixty-seven patients with acute, work-related low back pain referred for physical therapy participated in the study. The 2 scales were administered initially and after 4 weeks of physical therapy. The Physical Impairment Index, a measure of physical impairment due to low back pain, was measured initially and after 2 and 4 weeks. A global rating of change survey instrument was completed by each subject after 4 weeks. An interaction existed between patients defined as improved or stable based on the global rating using a 2-way analysis of variance for repeated measures on the impairment index. The modified OSW showed higher levels of test-retest reliability and responsiveness compared with the QUE. The minimum clinically important difference, defined as the amount of change that best distinguishes between patients who have improved and those remaining stable, was approximately 6 points for the modified OSW and approximately 15 points for the QUE. The construct validity of the global rating of change was supported by the stability of the Physical Impairment Index across the study period in patients defined as stable by the global rating and by the decrease in physical impairment across the study period in patients defined as improved by the global rating. The modified OSW demonstrated superior measurement properties compared with the QUE.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.

            This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of a new grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Four grades were developed for lumbar foraminal stenosis on the basis of sagittal MRI. Grade 0 refers to the absence of foraminal stenosis; grade 1 refers to mild foraminal stenosis showing perineural fat obliteration in the two opposing directions, vertical or transverse; grade 2 refers to moderate foraminal stenosis showing perineural fat obliteration in the four directions without morphologic change, both vertical and transverse directions; and grade 3 refers to severe foraminal stenosis showing nerve root collapse or morphologic change. A total of 576 foramina in 96 patients were analyzed (from L3-L4 to L5-S1). Two experienced radiologists independently assessed the sagittal MR images. Interobserver agreement between the two radiologists and intraobserver agreement by one reader were analyzed using kappa statistics. According to reader 1, grade 1 foraminal stenosis was found in 33 foramina, grade 2 in six, and grade 3 in seven. According to reader 2, grade 1 foraminal stenosis was found in 32 foramina, grade 2 in six, and grade 3 in eight. Interobserver agreement in the grading of foraminal stenosis between the two readers was found to be nearly perfect (kappa value: right L3-L4, 1.0; left L3-L4, 0.905; right L4-L5, 0.929; left L4-L5, 0.942; right L5-S1, 0.919; and left L5-S1, 0.909). In intraobserver agreement by reader 1, grade 1 foraminal stenosis was found in 34 foramina, grade 2 in eight, and grade 3 in seven. Intraobserver agreement in the grading of foraminal stenosis was also found to be nearly perfect (kappa value: right L3-L4, 0.883; left L3-L4, 1.00; right L4-L5, 0.957; left L4-L5, 0.885; right L5-S1, 0.800; and left L5-S1, 0.905). The new grading system for foraminal stenosis of the lumbar spine showed nearly perfect interobserver and intraobserver agreement and would be helpful for clinical study and routine practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lumbar spinal stenosis.

              Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is most commonly due to degenerative changes in older individuals. LSS is being more commonly diagnosed and may relate to better access to advanced imaging and to an ageing population. This review focusses on radicular symptoms related to degenerative central and lateral stenosis and updates knowledge of LSS pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Since patients with anatomic LSS can range from asymptomatic to severely disabled, the clinical diagnosis focusses on symptoms and examination findings associated with LSS. Imaging findings are helpful for patients with persistent, bothersome symptoms in whom invasive treatments are being considered. There is limited information from high-quality studies about the relative merits and demerits of commonly used treatments. Interpreting and comparing results of available research are limited by a lack of consensus about the definition of LSS. Nevertheless, evidence supports decompressive laminectomy for patients with persistent and bothersome symptoms. Recommendations favour a shared decision-making approach due to important trade-offs between alternative therapies and differences among patients in their preferences and values. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                26 March 2021
                April 2021
                : 10
                : 7
                : 1364
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang 14112, Korea; endospinekim@ 123456gmail.com
                [2 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul 06048, Korea; godisma@ 123456gmail.com (J.B.J.); nanooriresearch@ 123456naver.com (I.-T.J.)
                [3 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University School of Medicine, Gwangju 61453, Korea; pp3614@ 123456naver.com
                [4 ]The Faculty of Medicine of the University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 94, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary; yyea7133@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: neurospinekim@ 123456gmail.com ; Tel.: +82-2-6003-9767
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7630-2414
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-5234
                Article
                jcm-10-01364
                10.3390/jcm10071364
                8037803
                33810404
                17893a86-7c94-4122-be27-086b77e117e5
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 23 February 2021
                : 24 March 2021
                Categories
                Article

                endoscopy,lumbar,contralateral,foraminotomy,stenosis,dysesthesia,dorsal root ganglion

                Comments

                Comment on this article