4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council

      , ,
      Scientometrics
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gender equality and Open Access (OA) are priorities within the European Research Area and cross-cutting issues in European research program H2020. Gender and openness are also key elements of responsible research and innovation. However, despite the common underlying targets of fostering an inclusive, transparent and sustainable research environment, both issues are analysed as independent topics. This paper represents a first exploration of the inter-linkages between gender and OA analysing the scientific production of researchers of the Italian National Research Council under a gender perspective integrated with the different OA publications modes. A bibliometric analysis was carried out for articles published in the period 2016–2018 and retrieved from the Web of Science. Results are presented constantly analysing CNR scientific production in relation to gender, disciplinary fields and OA publication modes. These variables are also used when analysing articles that receive financial support. Our results indicate that gender disparities in scientific production still persist particularly in STEM disciplines, while the gender gap is the closest to parity in medical and agricultural sciences. A positive dynamic toward OA publishing and women’s scientific production is shown when disciplines with well-established open practices are related to articles supported by funds. A slightly higher women’s propensity toward OA is shown when considering Gold OA, or authorships with women in the first and last article by-line position. The prevalence of Italian funded articles with women’s contributions published in Gold OA journals seems to confirm this tendency, especially if considering the weak enforcement of the Italian OA policies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Scientometrics
                Scientometrics
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                0138-9130
                1588-2861
                February 2021
                January 05 2021
                February 2021
                : 126
                : 2
                : 1647-1673
                Article
                10.1007/s11192-020-03802-0
                1788761d-d906-42da-9bf7-991de07a624d
                © 2021

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article