125
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predicting nursing home admission in the U.S: a meta-analysis

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4
      BMC Geriatrics
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          While existing reviews have identified significant predictors of nursing home admission, this meta-analysis attempted to provide more integrated empirical findings to identify predictors. The present study aimed to generate pooled empirical associations for sociodemographic, functional, cognitive, service use, and informal support indicators that predict nursing home admission among older adults in the U.S.

          Methods

          Studies published in English were retrieved by searching the MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, CINAHL, and Digital Dissertations databases using the keywords: " nursing home placement," " nursing home entry," " nursing home admission," and " predictors/institutionalization." Any reports including these key words were retrieved. Bibliographies of retrieved articles were also searched. Selected studies included sampling frames that were nationally- or regionally-representative of the U.S. older population.

          Results

          Of 736 relevant reports identified, 77 reports across 12 data sources were included that used longitudinal designs and community-based samples. Information on number of nursing home admissions, length of follow-up, sample characteristics, analysis type, statistical adjustment, and potential risk factors were extracted with standardized protocols. Random effects models were used to separately pool the logistic and Cox regression model results from the individual data sources. Among the strongest predictors of nursing home admission were 3 or more activities of daily living dependencies (summary odds ratio [OR] = 3.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.56–4.09), cognitive impairment (OR = 2.54; CI, 1.44–4.51), and prior nursing home use (OR = 3.47; CI, 1.89–6.37).

          Conclusion

          The pooled associations provided detailed empirical information as to which variables emerged as the strongest predictors of NH admission (e.g., 3 or more ADL dependencies, cognitive impairment, prior NH use). These results could be utilized as weights in the construction and validation of prognostic tools to estimate risk for NH entry over a multi-year period.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for Reporting

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients.

            Clinicians whose practice includes elderly patients need a short, reliable instrument to detect the presence of intellectual impairment and to determine the degree. A 10-item Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), easily administered by any clinician in the office or in a hospital, has been designed, tested, standardized and validated. The standardization and validation procedure included administering the test to 997 elderly persons residing in the community, to 141 elderly persons referred for psychiatric and other health and social problems to a multipurpose clinic, and to 102 elderly persons living in institutions such as nursing homes, homes for the aged, or state mental hospitals. It was found that educational level and race had to be taken into account in scoring individual performance. On the basis of the large community population, standards of performance were established for: 1) intact mental functioning, 2) borderline or mild organic impairment, 3) definite but moderate organic impairment, and 4) severe organic impairment. In the 141 clinic patients, the SPMSQ scores were correlated with the clinical diagnoses. There was a high level of agreement between the clinical diagnosis of organic brain syndrome and the SPMSQ scores that indicated moderate or severe organic impairment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

              M. S. Pepe (2004)
              A marker strongly associated with outcome (or disease) is often assumed to be effective for classifying persons according to their current or future outcome. However, for this assumption to be true, the associated odds ratio must be of a magnitude rarely seen in epidemiologic studies. In this paper, an illustration of the relation between odds ratios and receiver operating characteristic curves shows, for example, that a marker with an odds ratio of as high as 3 is in fact a very poor classification tool. If a marker identifies 10% of controls as positive (false positives) and has an odds ratio of 3, then it will correctly identify only 25% of cases as positive (true positives). The authors illustrate that a single measure of association such as an odds ratio does not meaningfully describe a marker's ability to classify subjects. Appropriate statistical methods for assessing and reporting the classification power of a marker are described. In addition, the serious pitfalls of using more traditional methods based on parameters in logistic regression models are illustrated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatrics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2318
                2007
                19 June 2007
                : 7
                : 13
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center on Aging, Center for Gerontological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, 6-150 Weaver-Densford Hall, 1331, 308 Harvard Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA
                [2 ]Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, 1300 South Second Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454-1015 USA
                [3 ]Graduate Center for Gerontology, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 304H Charles T Wethington Building 0200, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
                [4 ]Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Mayo Mail Code 197, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
                Article
                1471-2318-7-13
                10.1186/1471-2318-7-13
                1914346
                17578574
                17871347-1f72-42ce-8295-3a33418de072
                Copyright © 2007 Gaugler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 December 2006
                : 19 June 2007
                Categories
                Research Article

                Geriatric medicine
                Geriatric medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article