50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Early Remdesivir to Prevent Progression to Severe Covid-19 in Outpatients

      research-article
      , M.D., Ph.D. , , M.D., , M.D., Ph.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., Ph.D., , M.D., , Ph.D., F.R.C.P., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , D.Phil., , M.D., , Ph.D., , Ph.D., , M.D., , M.D., , , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., M.P.H., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D.
      The New England Journal of Medicine
      Massachusetts Medical Society
      Keyword part (code): 18Keyword part (keyword): Infectious DiseaseKeyword part (code): 18_12Keyword part (keyword): Coronavirus , 18, Infectious Disease, Keyword part (code): 18_12Keyword part (keyword): Coronavirus, 18_12, Coronavirus

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Remdesivir improves clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Whether the use of remdesivir in symptomatic, nonhospitalized patients with Covid-19 who are at high risk for disease progression prevents hospitalization is uncertain.

          Methods

          We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving nonhospitalized patients with Covid-19 who had symptom onset within the previous 7 days and who had at least one risk factor for disease progression (age ≥60 years, obesity, or certain coexisting medical conditions). Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on day 1 and 100 mg on days 2 and 3) or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of Covid-19–related hospitalization or death from any cause by day 28. The primary safety end point was any adverse event. A secondary end point was a composite of a Covid-19–related medically attended visit or death from any cause by day 28.

          Results

          A total of 562 patients who underwent randomization and received at least one dose of remdesivir or placebo were included in the analyses: 279 patients in the remdesivir group and 283 in the placebo group. The mean age was 50 years, 47.9% of the patients were women, and 41.8% were Hispanic or Latinx. The most common coexisting conditions were diabetes mellitus (61.6%), obesity (55.2%), and hypertension (47.7%). Covid-19–related hospitalization or death from any cause occurred in 2 patients (0.7%) in the remdesivir group and in 15 (5.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.59; P=0.008). A total of 4 of 246 patients (1.6%) in the remdesivir group and 21 of 252 (8.3%) in the placebo group had a Covid-19–related medically attended visit by day 28 (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.56). No patients had died by day 28. Adverse events occurred in 42.3% of the patients in the remdesivir group and in 46.3% of those in the placebo group.

          Conclusions

          Among nonhospitalized patients who were at high risk for Covid-19 progression, a 3-day course of remdesivir had an acceptable safety profile and resulted in an 87% lower risk of hospitalization or death than placebo. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; PINETREE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04501952; EudraCT number, 2020-003510-12.)

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

          Summary Background A recent cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, was caused by a novel betacoronavirus, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). We report the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and treatment and clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods All patients with suspected 2019-nCoV were admitted to a designated hospital in Wuhan. We prospectively collected and analysed data on patients with laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing. Data were obtained with standardised data collection forms shared by WHO and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium from electronic medical records. Researchers also directly communicated with patients or their families to ascertain epidemiological and symptom data. Outcomes were also compared between patients who had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and those who had not. Findings By Jan 2, 2020, 41 admitted hospital patients had been identified as having laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection. Most of the infected patients were men (30 [73%] of 41); less than half had underlying diseases (13 [32%]), including diabetes (eight [20%]), hypertension (six [15%]), and cardiovascular disease (six [15%]). Median age was 49·0 years (IQR 41·0–58·0). 27 (66%) of 41 patients had been exposed to Huanan seafood market. One family cluster was found. Common symptoms at onset of illness were fever (40 [98%] of 41 patients), cough (31 [76%]), and myalgia or fatigue (18 [44%]); less common symptoms were sputum production (11 [28%] of 39), headache (three [8%] of 38), haemoptysis (two [5%] of 39), and diarrhoea (one [3%] of 38). Dyspnoea developed in 22 (55%) of 40 patients (median time from illness onset to dyspnoea 8·0 days [IQR 5·0–13·0]). 26 (63%) of 41 patients had lymphopenia. All 41 patients had pneumonia with abnormal findings on chest CT. Complications included acute respiratory distress syndrome (12 [29%]), RNAaemia (six [15%]), acute cardiac injury (five [12%]) and secondary infection (four [10%]). 13 (32%) patients were admitted to an ICU and six (15%) died. Compared with non-ICU patients, ICU patients had higher plasma levels of IL2, IL7, IL10, GSCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα. Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection caused clusters of severe respiratory illness similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and was associated with ICU admission and high mortality. Major gaps in our knowledge of the origin, epidemiology, duration of human transmission, and clinical spectrum of disease need fulfilment by future studies. Funding Ministry of Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China

            In December 2019, novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)-infected pneumonia (NCIP) occurred in Wuhan, China. The number of cases has increased rapidly but information on the clinical characteristics of affected patients is limited.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 — Final Report

              Abstract Background Although several therapeutic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), none have yet been shown to be efficacious. Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous remdesivir in adults hospitalized with Covid-19 with evidence of lower respiratory tract involvement. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remdesivir (200 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 100 mg daily for up to 9 additional days) or placebo for up to 10 days. The primary outcome was the time to recovery, defined by either discharge from the hospital or hospitalization for infection-control purposes only. Results A total of 1063 patients underwent randomization. The data and safety monitoring board recommended early unblinding of the results on the basis of findings from an analysis that showed shortened time to recovery in the remdesivir group. Preliminary results from the 1059 patients (538 assigned to remdesivir and 521 to placebo) with data available after randomization indicated that those who received remdesivir had a median recovery time of 11 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 12), as compared with 15 days (95% CI, 13 to 19) in those who received placebo (rate ratio for recovery, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.55; P<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality by 14 days were 7.1% with remdesivir and 11.9% with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.04). Serious adverse events were reported for 114 of the 541 patients in the remdesivir group who underwent randomization (21.1%) and 141 of the 522 patients in the placebo group who underwent randomization (27.0%). Conclusions Remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults hospitalized with Covid-19 and evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ACTT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04280705.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                N Engl J Med
                N Engl J Med
                nejm
                The New England Journal of Medicine
                Massachusetts Medical Society
                0028-4793
                1533-4406
                22 December 2021
                22 December 2021
                : NEJMoa2116846
                Affiliations
                From Baylor University Medical Center and Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas (R.L.G.), and Care United Research, Forney (S.M.) — all in Texas; the Nuren Medical and Research Center, Miami (C.E.V.), Evolution Clinical Trials, Hialeah Gardens (G.P.), the Midland Florida Clinical Research Center, DeLand (G.O.), Luminous Clinical Research–South Florida Urgent Care, Pembroke Pines (A.H.), and Triple O Research Institute Professional Association, West Palm Beach (O.O.) — all in Florida; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Barcelona (R.P.), and Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor and Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid (P.R.) — all in Spain; the Cherokee Nation Outpatient Health Center, Tahlequah, OK (J.M.); Intermountain Healthcare (B.J.W., S.M.B.) and the University of Utah School of Medicine (S.M.B.) — both in Murray; Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (B.U.N.); University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine — both in London (M.B.); the Institute of Liver Health, Mesa, AZ (Y.S.); Kaiser Permanente, Oakland (J.S.), and Gilead Sciences, Foster City (K.J., R.H.H., A.O., S.C., G.C., M.A., S.D., N.B.-R., F.D.) — both in California; Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School — both in Boston (F.M.M.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (M.J.K.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (A.A.G.); and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the University of Washington School of Medicine — both in Seattle (J.T.S., J.A.H.).
                Author notes
                Dr. Gottlieb can be contacted at robert.gottlieb@ 123456bswhealth.org or at Baylor University Medical Center, Center for Advanced Heart and Lung Disease, 3410 Worth St., Ste. 250, Dallas, TX 75246.
                []

                Francisco M. Marty, M.D., is deceased.

                [†]

                A complete list of the GS-US-540-9012 (PINETREE) Investigators is provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8376-8709
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3708-8734
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-6261
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7665-7100
                Article
                NJ202112223860402
                10.1056/NEJMoa2116846
                8757570
                34937145
                175fbbb1-1830-4580-a899-1481befa96a5
                Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use, except commercial resale, and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgment of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the Covid-19 pandemic or until revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, subject to existing copyright protections.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Gilead Sciences, FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005564;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                2021-12-22T17:00:00-05:00
                2021
                12
                22
                17
                00
                00
                -05:00

                Comments

                Comment on this article