Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    6
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Unergatives are different: Two types of transitivity in Samoan

      research-article
      1
      Glossa: a journal of general linguistics
      Ubiquity Press
      Unergatives, Samoan, transitivity, ergativity, external arguments

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper provides arguments in favour of a non-unified treatment of transitive and unergative verbs, based upon the patterning of unergative constructions in the ergative-absolutive language Samoan. Building upon a proposal by Massam ( 2009; to appear), I argue that unergative subjects in Samoan are merged lower than transitive subjects, the result being a difference in case marking patterns associated with each verb type. In the spirit of much work which has advocated for a split vP structure (e.g., Pylkkännen 2008; Harley 2013; Legate 2014; a.o.), I propose that unergative subjects are merged in the specifier of vP, while transitive subjects are introduced in a higher projection (VoiceP). This proposal is motivated primarily from split case patterning: while Samoan unergative subjects appear with absolutive case, addition of an object to an unergative verb does not yield the typical ergative-absolutive pattern associated with canonical transitives. Instead, a non-ergative case pattern arises, in which the subject is absolutive, and the object is marked with the prenominal marker i. The Samoan UNERGATIVE + OBJECT construction bears similarities with another set of two-place (so-called MIDDLE VERBS) which exhibit the same ABS- i case frame. Despite the absence of ergative case, both UNERGATIVE + OBJECT and middle constructions are syntactically transitive with respect to various language-internal diagnostics. I argue that the case split results from differing case assigning properties of v and Voice: i is analysed as structural accusative case, assigned to the object by v 0, while ergative subjects are assigned case by Voice 0. The division of external arguments across two VP-external projections can be captured by expanding Dowty’s ( 1991) framework of thematic proto-roles, whereby unergative and middle “proto- low” ( vP) agents encompass a subset of the semantic properties of full-fledged transitive “proto- high” (VoiceP) agents. The additional properties of proto-high agents correspond to additional phrasal structure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Thematic proto-roles and argument selection

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            Severing the External Argument from its Verb

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                2397-1835
                Glossa: a journal of general linguistics
                Ubiquity Press
                2397-1835
                16 March 2018
                2018
                : 3
                : 1
                : 35
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, Toronto ON M5S 3G3, CA
                Article
                10.5334/gjgl.223
                1752ecaa-5aa1-46e8-a7bc-fd07adfa4a92
                Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 05 August 2016
                : 07 October 2017
                Categories
                Research

                General linguistics,Linguistics & Semiotics
                Unergatives,external arguments,ergativity,transitivity,Samoan

                Comments

                Comment on this article