This paper provides arguments in favour of a non-unified treatment of transitive and unergative verbs, based upon the patterning of unergative constructions in the ergative-absolutive language Samoan. Building upon a proposal by Massam ( 2009; to appear), I argue that unergative subjects in Samoan are merged lower than transitive subjects, the result being a difference in case marking patterns associated with each verb type. In the spirit of much work which has advocated for a split vP structure (e.g., Pylkkännen 2008; Harley 2013; Legate 2014; a.o.), I propose that unergative subjects are merged in the specifier of vP, while transitive subjects are introduced in a higher projection (VoiceP). This proposal is motivated primarily from split case patterning: while Samoan unergative subjects appear with absolutive case, addition of an object to an unergative verb does not yield the typical ergative-absolutive pattern associated with canonical transitives. Instead, a non-ergative case pattern arises, in which the subject is absolutive, and the object is marked with the prenominal marker i. The Samoan UNERGATIVE + OBJECT construction bears similarities with another set of two-place (so-called MIDDLE VERBS) which exhibit the same ABS- i case frame. Despite the absence of ergative case, both UNERGATIVE + OBJECT and middle constructions are syntactically transitive with respect to various language-internal diagnostics. I argue that the case split results from differing case assigning properties of v and Voice: i is analysed as structural accusative case, assigned to the object by v 0, while ergative subjects are assigned case by Voice 0. The division of external arguments across two VP-external projections can be captured by expanding Dowty’s ( 1991) framework of thematic proto-roles, whereby unergative and middle “proto- low” ( vP) agents encompass a subset of the semantic properties of full-fledged transitive “proto- high” (VoiceP) agents. The additional properties of proto-high agents correspond to additional phrasal structure.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.