37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cardiovascular safety of oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: Rationale, design and patient baseline characteristics for the PIONEER 6 trial

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 5 , , MD 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , , MD 9 , , MD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 13 , , PhD 14 , , MD 15 , , MD 16 , , MD 17 , , MD 18 , , MD 19 , 20 , 21 , , MD 22 , , MD 23 , , MBBS 24 , , MSc 25 , , MSc 25 , , MD 25 , , MD 10 , 26
      Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
      Blackwell Publishing Ltd
      cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular outcomes trial, GLP‐1 receptor agonist, oral semaglutide, type 2 diabetes

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To assess the cardiovascular (CV) safety of oral semaglutide, the first tablet formulation of a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist.

          Materials and methods

          PIONEER 6 is a multinational, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV events (defined as being aged ≥50 years and having established CV disease [CVD] or moderate [stage 3] chronic kidney disease [CKD], or being aged ≥60 years with ≥1 other CV risk factor). Patients were randomized to once‐daily oral semaglutide (up to 14 mg) or placebo added to standard of care. The primary composite endpoint is time to first occurrence of CV death or non‐fatal myocardial infarction or non‐fatal stroke. The primary hypothesis was to exclude an excess in CV risk with oral semaglutide by assessing non‐inferiority versus placebo for the primary endpoint (non‐inferiority margin of 1.8 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio). PIONEER 6 is event‐driven, with follow‐up continuing until accrual of at least 122 primary outcome events. There is no pre‐defined minimal duration.

          Results

          Overall, 3183 patients have been enrolled (mean age 66.1 years, 31.6% females) in 214 sites across 21 countries. At baseline, the mean duration of diabetes was 14.9 years, mean glycated haemoglobin concentration was 66 mmol/mol (8.2%), and 84.6% of patients had established CVD/moderate CKD.

          Conclusions

          PIONEER 6 will provide evidence regarding the CV safety of oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes and high CV risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.

          The cardiovascular effects of adding once-weekly treatment with exenatide to usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes are unknown.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cardiovascular Actions and Clinical Outcomes With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors.

            Potentiation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) action through selective GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonism or by prevention of enzymatic degradation by inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) promotes glycemic reduction for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus by glucose-dependent control of insulin and glucagon secretion. GLP-1R agonists also decelerate gastric emptying, reduce body weight by reduction of food intake and lower circulating lipoproteins, inflammation, and systolic blood pressure. Preclinical studies demonstrate that both GLP-1R agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors exhibit cardioprotective actions in animal models of myocardial ischemia and ventricular dysfunction through incompletely characterized mechanisms. The results of cardiovascular outcome trials in human subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and increased cardiovascular risk have demonstrated a cardiovascular benefit (significant reduction in time to first major adverse cardiovascular event) with the GLP-1R agonists liraglutide (LEADER trial [Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Ourcome Results], -13%) and semaglutide (SUSTAIN-6 trial [Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes with Semaglutide], -24%). In contrast, cardiovascular outcome trials examining the safety of the shorter-acting GLP-1R agonist lixisenatide (ELIXA trial [Evaluation of Lixisenatide in Acute Coronary Syndrom]) and the DPP-4 inhibitors saxagliptin (SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial [Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53]), alogliptin (EXAMINE trial [Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Alogliptin Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Coronary Syndrome]), and sitagliptin (TECOS [Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes With Sitagliptin]) found that these agents neither increased nor decreased cardiovascular events. Here we review the cardiovascular actions of GLP-1R agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, with a focus on the translation of mechanisms derived from preclinical studies to complementary findings in clinical studies. We highlight areas of uncertainty requiring more careful scrutiny in ongoing basic science and clinical studies. As newer more potent GLP-1R agonists and coagonists are being developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, the delineation of the potential mechanisms that underlie the cardiovascular benefit and safety of these agents have immediate relevance for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              9. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management:Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018

              (2018)
              The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                s.c.bain@swansea.ac.uk
                Journal
                Diabetes Obes Metab
                Diabetes Obes Metab
                10.1111/(ISSN)1463-1326
                DOM
                Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1462-8902
                1463-1326
                11 November 2018
                March 2019
                : 21
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/dom.2019.21.issue-3 )
                : 499-508
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Diabetes Research Unit Cymru Swansea University Medical School Swansea UK
                [ 2 ] Diabetes Unit, Division of Internal Medicine Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital Jerusalem Israel
                [ 3 ] Department of Endocrinology, Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara Jalisco Mexico
                [ 4 ] Department of Education and Obesity Treatment and Metabolic Disorders Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poznan Poland
                [ 5 ] Department of Endocrinology Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Balcova Izmir Turkey
                [ 6 ] Department of Medicine and Aging, and Center of Aging Science and Translational Medicine (CESI‐Met) "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti‐Pescara Chieti Italy
                [ 7 ] Diabetes and Endocrinology Unit, Rajavithi Hospital Rangsit Medical School Bangkok Thailand
                [ 8 ] Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Ohio State University Columbus Ohio
                [ 9 ] Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Dr Cesar Milstein Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
                [ 10 ] Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine and the Heart and Stroke Richard Lewar Centre University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 11 ] CPCLIN Clinical Research Center São Paulo Brazil
                [ 12 ] Department of Endocrinology Hospital of Southwest Denmark Esbjerg Denmark
                [ 13 ] Department of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Carol Davila' Bucharest Romania
                [ 14 ] Diabetes Care and Clinical Trials Centre Pretoria South Africa
                [ 15 ] Department of Internal Medicine CHU Sétif Sétif Algeria
                [ 16 ] Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition University Hospital La Fe Valencia Spain
                [ 17 ] Diabetes Center Bochum‐Hattingen, Medical Department I St Josef‐Hospital, Ruhr‐University Bochum Bochum Germany
                [ 18 ] C‐ENDO Diabetes and Endocrinology Clinic Calgary Alberta, Canada
                [ 19 ] Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine Taichung Veterans General Hospital Taichung Taiwan
                [ 20 ] School of Medicine National Yang‐Ming University Taipei Taiwan
                [ 21 ] School of Medicine National Defense Medical Centre Taipei Taiwan
                [ 22 ] Southern New Hampshire Diabetes and Endocrinology Nashua New Hampshire
                [ 23 ] Department of Internal Medicine Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
                [ 24 ] Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India
                [ 25 ] Novo Nordisk A/S Bagsværd Denmark
                [ 26 ] Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, and the Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research Toronto Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Stephen C. Bain MA, MD, FRCP, Diabetes Research Group Cymru, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.

                Email: s.c.bain@ 123456swansea.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8519-4964
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1289-1595
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8703-0522
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5749-6954
                Article
                DOM13553
                10.1111/dom.13553
                6587508
                30284349
                172c0f09-eae2-4c5a-8ce9-6224a492ea04
                © 2018 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 20 June 2018
                : 18 September 2018
                : 01 October 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 10, Words: 7772
                Funding
                Funded by: Novo Nordisk A/S
                Categories
                Clinical Trial Design
                Clinical Trial Design
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                dom13553
                March 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.4 mode:remove_FC converted:21.06.2019

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                cardiovascular disease,cardiovascular outcomes trial,glp‐1 receptor agonist,oral semaglutide,type 2 diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article