23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Low-dose ipilimumab plus nivolumab combined with IL-2 and hyperthermia in cancer patients with advanced disease: exploratory findings of a case series of 131 stage IV cancers – a retrospective study of a single institution

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with previously treated or untreated stage III or IV melanoma has by now reached 63% using ipilimumab and nivolumab therapy. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 59% of patients leading to discontinuation of therapy in 24.5% of patients and one death. Therapy with checkpoint inhibitors could be safer and more effective in combination with hyperthermia and fever inducing therapies. We conducted a retrospective analysis to test the safety and efficacy of a new combination immune therapy in 131 unselected stage IV solid cancer patients with 23 different histological types of cancer who exhausted all conventional treatments. Treatment consisted of locoregional- and whole-body hyperthermia, individually dose adapted interleukin 2 (IL-2) combined with low-dose ipilimumab (0.3 mg/kg) plus nivolumab (0.5 mg/kg). The objective response rate (ORR) was 31.3%, progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months, survival probabilities at 6 months was 86.7% (95% CI, 81.0–92.8%), at 9 months was 73.5% (95% CI, 66.2–81.7%), at 12 months was 66.5% (95% CI, 58.6–75.4%), while at 24 months survival was 36.6% (95% CI:28.2%; 47.3%). irAEs of World Health Organization (WHO) Toxicity Scale grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 23.66%, 16.03%, 6.11%, and 2.29% of patients, respectively. Our results suggest that the irAEs profile of the combined treatment is safer than that of the established protocols without compromising efficacy.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00262-020-02751-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

          An improvement in overall survival among patients with metastatic melanoma has been an elusive goal. In this phase 3 study, ipilimumab--which blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 to potentiate an antitumor T-cell response--administered with or without a glycoprotein 100 (gp100) peptide vaccine was compared with gp100 alone in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. A total of 676 HLA-A*0201-positive patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, whose disease had progressed while they were receiving therapy for metastatic disease, were randomly assigned, in a 3:1:1 ratio, to receive ipilimumab plus gp100 (403 patients), ipilimumab alone (137), or gp100 alone (136). Ipilimumab, at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight, was administered with or without gp100 every 3 weeks for up to four treatments (induction). Eligible patients could receive reinduction therapy. The primary end point was overall survival. The median overall survival was 10.0 months among patients receiving ipilimumab plus gp100, as compared with 6.4 months among patients receiving gp100 alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; P<0.001). The median overall survival with ipilimumab alone was 10.1 months (hazard ratio for death in the comparison with gp100 alone, 0.66; P=0.003). No difference in overall survival was detected between the ipilimumab groups (hazard ratio with ipilimumab plus gp100, 1.04; P=0.76). Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 10 to 15% of patients treated with ipilimumab and in 3% treated with gp100 alone. There were 14 deaths related to the study drugs (2.1%), and 7 were associated with immune-related adverse events. Ipilimumab, with or without a gp100 peptide vaccine, as compared with gp100 alone, improved overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Adverse events can be severe, long-lasting, or both, but most are reversible with appropriate treatment. (Funded by Medarex and Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094653.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tumor mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types

            Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatments benefit some patients with metastatic cancers, but predictive biomarkers are needed. Findings in select cancer types suggest that tumor mutational burden (TMB) may predict clinical response to ICI.To examine this association more broadly, we analyzed the clinical and genomic data of 1662 advanced cancer patients treated with ICI, and 5371 non-ICI treated patients, whose tumors underwent targeted next-generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT). Among all patients, higher somatic TMB (highest 20% in each histology) was associated with better OS (HR 0.52; p=1.6 ×10 −6 ). For most cancer histologies, an association between higher TMB and improved survival was observed. The TMB cutpoints associated with improved survival varied markedly between cancer types. These data indicate that TMB is associated with improved survival in patients receiving ICI across a wide variety of cancer types, but that there may not be one universal definition of high TMB.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden

              Background High tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an emerging biomarker of sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors and has been shown to be more significantly associated with response to PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy than PD-1 or PD-L1 expression, as measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The distribution of TMB and the subset of patients with high TMB has not been well characterized in the majority of cancer types. Methods In this study, we compare TMB measured by a targeted comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay to TMB measured by exome sequencing and simulate the expected variance in TMB when sequencing less than the whole exome. We then describe the distribution of TMB across a diverse cohort of 100,000 cancer cases and test for association between somatic alterations and TMB in over 100 tumor types. Results We demonstrate that measurements of TMB from comprehensive genomic profiling are strongly reflective of measurements from whole exome sequencing and model that below 0.5 Mb the variance in measurement increases significantly. We find that a subset of patients exhibits high TMB across almost all types of cancer, including many rare tumor types, and characterize the relationship between high TMB and microsatellite instability status. We find that TMB increases significantly with age, showing a 2.4-fold difference between age 10 and age 90 years. Finally, we investigate the molecular basis of TMB and identify genes and mutations associated with TMB level. We identify a cluster of somatic mutations in the promoter of the gene PMS2, which occur in 10% of skin cancers and are highly associated with increased TMB. Conclusions These results show that a CGP assay targeting ~1.1 Mb of coding genome can accurately assess TMB compared with sequencing the whole exome. Using this method, we find that many disease types have a substantial portion of patients with high TMB who might benefit from immunotherapy. Finally, we identify novel, recurrent promoter mutations in PMS2, which may be another example of regulatory mutations contributing to tumorigenesis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0424-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ralf.kleef@dr-kleef.at
                robert.nagy@dr-kleef.at
                andreas.baierl@univie.ac.at
                viktor.bacher@dr-kleef.at
                bojar@uni-dusseldorf.de
                dlmckeemd@gmail.com
                ralphwmoss@gmail.com
                info@onkologie-am-lenbachplatz.de
                szasz.attila_marcell@med.semmelweis-univ.hu
                tiborbakacs@gmail.com
                Journal
                Cancer Immunol Immunother
                Cancer Immunol Immunother
                Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0340-7004
                1432-0851
                5 November 2020
                5 November 2020
                2021
                : 70
                : 5
                : 1393-1403
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Immunology and Integrative Oncology, Auhofstraße 1, 1130 Vienna, Austria
                [2 ]GRID grid.10420.37, ISNI 0000 0001 2286 1424, Department of Statistic and Operations Research, , University of Vienna, ; Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 1090 Vienna, Austria
                [3 ]NextGen Oncology, Dusseldorf, Germany
                [4 ]Integrative Cancer Consulting, Aptos, CA USA
                [5 ]Moss Reports, 104 Main Street, Unit 1422, Blue Hill, ME 04614-1422 USA
                [6 ]Oncology Center at Lenbachplatz, Ottostr. 3, 80333 Munich, Germany
                [7 ]GRID grid.11804.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 0942 9821, Cancer Centre, , Semmelweis University, ; 1083 Budapest, Hungary
                [8 ]PRET Therapeutics Ltd, 1124 Budapest, Hungary
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9145-9276
                Article
                2751
                10.1007/s00262-020-02751-0
                8053148
                33151369
                16f0e55b-833c-4ead-b3d2-2d8f2353bdd0
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 March 2020
                : 14 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: ELKH Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                stage iv cancer,immunotherapy,hyperthermia,il-2,checkpoint inhibitors,iraes
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                stage iv cancer, immunotherapy, hyperthermia, il-2, checkpoint inhibitors, iraes

                Comments

                Comment on this article