17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intrinsic Disorder and Posttranslational Modifications: The Darker Side of the Biological Dark Matter

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs) are functional proteins and domains that devoid stable secondary and/or tertiary structure. IDPs/IDPRs are abundantly present in various proteomes, where they are involved in regulation, signaling, and control, thereby serving as crucial regulators of various cellular processes. Various mechanisms are utilized to tightly regulate and modulate biological functions, structural properties, cellular levels, and localization of these important controllers. Among these regulatory mechanisms are precisely controlled degradation and different posttranslational modifications (PTMs). Many normal cellular processes are associated with the presence of the right amounts of precisely activated IDPs at right places and in right time. However, wrecked regulation of IDPs/IDPRs might be associated with various human maladies, ranging from cancer and neurodegeneration to cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Pathogenic transformations of IDPs/IDPRs are often triggered by altered PTMs. This review considers some of the aspects of IDPs/IDPRs and their normal and aberrant regulation by PTMs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references146

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm.

          A major challenge in the post-genome era will be determination of the functions of the encoded protein sequences. Since it is generally assumed that the function of a protein is closely linked to its three-dimensional structure, prediction or experimental determination of the library of protein structures is a matter of high priority. However, a large proportion of gene sequences appear to code not for folded, globular proteins, but for long stretches of amino acids that are likely to be either unfolded in solution or adopt non-globular structures of unknown conformation. Characterization of the conformational propensities and function of the non-globular protein sequences represents a major challenge. The high proportion of these sequences in the genomes of all organisms studied to date argues for important, as yet unknown functions, since there could be no other reason for their persistence throughout evolution. Clearly the assumption that a folded three-dimensional structure is necessary for function needs to be re-examined. Although the functions of many proteins are directly related to their three-dimensional structures, numerous proteins that lack intrinsic globular structure under physiological conditions have now been recognized. Such proteins are frequently involved in some of the most important regulatory functions in the cell, and the lack of intrinsic structure in many cases is relieved when the protein binds to its target molecule. The intrinsic lack of structure can confer functional advantages on a protein, including the ability to bind to several different targets. It also allows precise control over the thermodynamics of the binding process and provides a simple mechanism for inducibility by phosphorylation or through interaction with other components of the cellular machinery. Numerous examples of domains that are unstructured in solution but which become structured upon binding to the target have been noted in the areas of cell cycle control and both transcriptional and translational regulation, and unstructured domains are present in proteins that are targeted for rapid destruction. Since such proteins participate in critical cellular control mechanisms, it appears likely that their rapid turnover, aided by their unstructured nature in the unbound state, provides a level of control that allows rapid and accurate responses of the cell to changing environmental conditions. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications.

            Post-translational modifications modulate the activity of most eukaryote proteins. Analysis of these modifications presents formidable challenges but their determination generates indispensable insight into biological function. Strategies developed to characterize individual proteins are now systematically applied to protein populations. The combination of function- or structure-based purification of modified 'subproteomes', such as phosphorylated proteins or modified membrane proteins, with mass spectrometry is proving particularly successful. To map modification sites in molecular detail, novel mass spectrometric peptide sequencing and analysis technologies hold tremendous potential. Finally, stable isotope labeling strategies in combination with mass spectrometry have been applied successfully to study the dynamics of modifications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The crucial role of protein phosphorylation in cell signaling and its use as targeted therapy (Review)

              Protein phosphorylation is an important cellular regulatory mechanism as many enzymes and receptors are activated/deactivated by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events, by means of kinases and phosphatases. In particular, the protein kinases are responsible for cellular transduction signaling and their hyperactivity, malfunction or overexpression can be found in several diseases, mostly tumors. Therefore, it is evident that the use of kinase inhibitors can be valuable for the treatment of cancer. In this review, we discuss the mechanism of action of phosphorylation, with particular attention to the importance of phosphorylation under physiological and pathological conditions. We also discuss the possibility of using kinase inhibitors in the treatment of tumors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Genet
                Front Genet
                Front. Genet.
                Frontiers in Genetics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-8021
                04 May 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 158
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Molecular Medicine, USF Health Byrd Alzheimer’s Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida , Tampa, FL, United States
                [2] 2Laboratory of New Methods in Biology, Institute for Biological Instrumentation, Russian Academy of Sciences , Pushchino, Russia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Amit Kumar Yadav, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, India

                Reviewed by: Andreas Zanzoni, INSERM UMR1090 Technologies Avancées pour le Génome et la Clinique, France; Georges Nemer, American University of Beirut, Lebanon

                *Correspondence: Vladimir N. Uversky, vuversky@ 123456health.usf.edu

                This article was submitted to Systems Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

                Article
                10.3389/fgene.2018.00158
                5945825
                29780404
                15cb5d9c-1236-4cef-be84-0264aaec7eaf
                Copyright © 2018 Darling and Uversky.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 February 2018
                : 17 April 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 192, Pages: 18, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: RF1AG055088
                Categories
                Genetics
                Review

                Genetics
                intrinsically disordered proteins,intrinsically disordered protein regions,posstranslational modifications,multifunctional proteins,protein–protein interaction (ppi)

                Comments

                Comment on this article