23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phenology and foraging bias contribute to sex‐specific foraging patterns in the rare declining butterfly Argynnis idalia idalia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Variation in pollinator foraging behavior can influence pollination effectiveness, community diversity, and plant–pollinator network structure. Although effects of interspecific variation have been widely documented, studies of intraspecific variation in pollinator foraging are relatively rare. Sex‐specific differences in resource use are a strong potential source of intraspecific variation, especially in species where the phenology of males and females differ. Differences may arise from encountering different flowering communities, sex‐specific traits, nutritional requirements, or a combination of these factors. We evaluated sex‐specific foraging patterns in the eastern regal fritillary butterfly ( Argynnis idalia idalia), leveraging a 21‐year floral visitation dataset. Because A. i. idalia is protandrous, we determined whether foraging differences were due to divergent phenology by comparing visitation patterns between the entire season with restricted periods of male–female overlap. We quantified nectar carbohydrate and amino acid contents of the most visited plant species and compared those visited more frequently by males versus females. We demonstrate significant differences in visitation patterns between male and female A. i. idalia over two decades. Females visit a greater diversity of species, while dissimilarity in foraging patterns between sexes is persistent and comparable to differences between species. While differences are diminished or absent in some years during periods of male–female overlap, remaining signatures of foraging dissimilarity during implicate mechanisms other than phenology. Nectar of plants visited more by females had greater concentrations of total carbohydrates, glucose, and fructose and individual amino acids than male‐associated plants. Further work can test whether nutritional differences are a cause of visitation patterns or consequence, reflecting seasonal shifts in the nutritional landscape encountered by male and female A. i. idalia. We highlight the importance of considering sex‐specific foraging patterns when studying interaction networks, and in making conservation management decisions for this at‐risk butterfly and other species exhibiting strong intraspecific variation.

          Abstract

          Sex‐specific foraging behavior is an understudied driver of intraspecific variation in plant–pollinator relationships. We examined 21 years of flower visitation in the rare, declining butterfly Argynnis idalia idalia in order to determine the role that both phenology and visitation bias play in driving differences between male and female floral nectaring. Furthermore, we described variation in the concentration of floral nectar compounds in plant species differentially visited by female and males. We demonstrate that differences in sex‐specific floral visitation patterns are partially a product of both phenology and visitation bias, and that this may have implications for the nutrient landscape both sexes experience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          R: a language and environment for statistical computing

          (2021)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Entropy and diversity

            Lou Jost (2006)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size.

              Bees are the most important pollinator taxon; therefore, understanding the scale at which they forage has important ecological implications and conservation applications. The foraging ranges for most bee species are unknown. Foraging distance information is critical for understanding the scale at which bee populations respond to the landscape, assessing the role of bee pollinators in affecting plant population structure, planning conservation strategies for plants, and designing bee habitat refugia that maintain pollination function for wild and crop plants. We used data from 96 records of 62 bee species to determine whether body size predicts foraging distance. We regressed maximum and typical foraging distances on body size and found highly significant and explanatory nonlinear relationships. We used a second data set to: (1) compare observed reports of foraging distance to the distances predicted by our regression equations and (2) assess the biases inherent to the different techniques that have been used to assess foraging distance. The equations we present can be used to predict foraging distances for many bee species, based on a simple measurement of body size.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rachel.spigler@temple.edu
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                18 July 2023
                July 2023
                : 13
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v13.7 )
                : e10287
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Biology Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 2 ] Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology Potsdam Germany
                [ 3 ] The Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Fort Indiantown Gap National Guard Training Center Annville Pennsylvania USA
                [ 4 ]Present address: Department of Biology Utah State University Logan Utah USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Rachel B. Spigler, Department of Biology, Temple University, 1900 North 12th St., Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

                Email: rachel.spigler@ 123456temple.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4467-4977
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-7611
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-335X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4305-0238
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-571X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5997-9781
                Article
                ECE310287 ECE-2022-09-01314.R2
                10.1002/ece3.10287
                10353922
                159f30b7-5d58-41bc-91d9-edb5bfb0827d
                © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 20 June 2023
                : 15 March 2022
                : 26 June 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 14, Words: 11176
                Funding
                Funded by: Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs , doi 10.13039/100004907;
                Award ID: 4300420055
                Award ID: 4300599299
                Funded by: Temple University Libraries
                Categories
                Community Ecology
                Conservation Ecology
                Entomology
                Trophic Interactions
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.2 mode:remove_FC converted:18.07.2023

                Evolutionary Biology
                flower visitation,intraspecific variation,long‐term ecological data,nectar chemistry,plant–pollinator interactions,sex‐specific foraging,speyeria idalia idalia

                Comments

                Comment on this article