7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hidden Epidermal Cyst Formation below the Umbilical Circular Keloid

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor: As many surgical operations have been replaced by laparoscopic surgery, the number of umbilical keloid patients is gradually increasing. Epidermal cyst, one of the common benign intradermal or subcutaneous tumors, usually results from the trauma to the pilosebaceous unit in the hair-bearing area. Several previous reports have revealed that epidermal cysts can occur adjacent to the surgical incision line1. However, to our knowledge, a report describing an epidermal cyst below an umbilical circular keloid has not been published. We experienced three cases of hidden epidermal cyst formation below an umbilical circular keloid. All three patients had no previous injury history from needles such as intralesional injection. In two middle-aged female with tenderness of the keloid, a ruptured epidermal cyst was identified by incisional biopsy (Fig. 1A~H). When we tried the incision, pus and keratinous materials were evacuated (Fig. 1B). Both patients were treated with empirical antibiotics and pus drainage with sterile packing dressing. The other case was a 78-year-old male presenting with recurrent pain and discomfort around an umbilical keloid (Fig. 1I). An ultrasonographic examination confirmed the formation of epidermal cyst below the scar, and excision of the cyst was performed accordingly. The pathology examination revealed a well-demarcated cystic mass with hair follicle invagination (Fig. 1J, K). Although the pathophysiology of this condition is not fully understood, several relevant factors can be inferred. First, injury is one of the risk factors for epidermal cyst formation. Any post-operative site is vulnerable to formation of epidermal cyst. Trauma may stimulate epithelial proliferation and create the cysts. Second, because the umbilicus is originally a curled structure, it is difficult to suture each layer by aligning it2. As laparoscopic surgery requires multiple layers of suture, it is possible to cause more of the epidermis to be entrapped in the final wound. If epithelial elements are retained within the infolded dermoglandular structures or at any other skin closure, epithelial inclusion cyst may occur. Third, because keloid formation occurs as a result of abnormal wound healing, a history of poor healing in the umbilicus area can be considered a risk factor for both keloids and epidermal cysts. In such a condition as described above, surgical intervention may be necessary in most patients. The area around the umbilicus is warm, humid, and difficult to keep clean; it is an environment in which cyst inflammation can easily occur. If the epidermal cyst is left untreated, secondary infections can occur, leading to abscesses, necrosis, scarring, cellulitis, or even sepsis3 4. In addition to an epidermal cyst, there are many other causes of inflammation around the umbilicus. In patients with suspected inflammation, it is important to perform appropriate imaging test5. Also, a patient's predisposing factors (e.g., poor hygiene, diabetes mellitus, obesity, corticosteroid use, and immunosuppression) should be identified at the time of presentation5. We reviewed three cases of hidden epidermal cyst formation below the umbilical circular keloid. Rapid and appropriate intervention has been delayed in numerous keloid patients. We hope that many dermatologists will review this condition after reading this report.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A Simple, Effective Technique for Port-Site Closure After Laparoscopy

          INTRODUCTION New technical challenges have emerged since the introduction of the laparoscopic approach in surgery. One of these is fascial closure at port sites, which is necessary especially when large trocars are used or after dilation of a port site for organ extraction (ie, gallbladder, appendix). New developments, such as single-port laparoscopic surgery, and the need for small esthetic incisions render fascial closure a current issue. Since the first report of herniation at a trocar site after laparoscopy, 1 many techniques and devices have been introduced into practice to minimize the risk of port-site complications, which occur in 1% to 6% of cases. 2,3 The standard closure technique for fascia at the port site through a small skin incision can be tricky and frustrating, often requiring blind suturing of the fascial defect (with consequent risk of incomplete suture and lesions of intraperitoneal organs) or larger skin incisions. We herein propose a new method for safe suturing of the abdominal fascia in port-site wounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS The surgical procedure may be performed in 1 step or in 2 steps. The 1-step technique (Figure 1) is performed as follows: The needle is passed through the skin and part of the adjacent subcutaneous layer, a few centimeters away from the wound margin, and exits into the wound (Figure 1b). While the fascia and peritoneum are pulled up with a tissue forceps, the needle is passed through them on both sides of the wound, one at a time (Figure 1c and 1d). The needle is then grasped with the tissue forceps in the portion exposed between the skin and the fascia (Figure 1e). The needle is pulled out of the wound while the tissue forceps is kept in place (Figure 1f). The tissue forceps is pulled out from the wound along with the grasped surgical thread (Figures 1g and 1h). Figure 1. One-step technique for fascial closure. The 2-step technique (Figure 2) is performed as follows: The needle is passed through the skin and part of the subcutaneous layer, a few centimeters away from the wound margin, and exits into the wound (Figure 2a). While the fascia and peritoneum are pulled up with a tissue forceps, the needle is passed through them, one at a time (Figure 2b). The needle is then grasped with the tissue forceps in the exposed portion between the skin and fascia (Figures 2c and 2d). The needle is pulled out of the wound while the tissue forceps is kept in place (Figure 2e). The tissue forceps is pulled out along with the grasped surgical thread (Figures 2f and 2g). The same steps are repeated for the other side of the wound, but in an inside-out direction. Figure 2. Two-step technique for fascial closure. The sequence of transcutaneous and transfascial passages of the needle allows the subsequent withdrawal of the surgical thread from the superficial plane (skin and part of the adjacent subcutaneous layer) leaving it only at the level of the deep plane (fascia and peritoneum). This transcutaneous approach enables the needle to enter the fascia and peritoneum in an acute angle (Figure 1c), which is safer than the standard technique. Such an approach assures optimal access to the fascial plane, otherwise impossible to obtain by using the common retraction maneuvers. The method allows suturing the fascia close to the angles of incision, which may be unfeasible if the standard technique is used; consequently, 2 lateral sutures may be placed instead of a medial one, which is usually done when the standard technique is used. Additionally, it allows the use of larger needles that are easier to manipulate, making the suturing maneuvers safer and faster. RESULTS The method was used in 34 patients with no intraoperative incidents; in 31 of 34 patients (91.2%) 2 lateral sutures were made (instead of a medial one). No port-site hernias occurred during a mean follow-up of 23.9 months (median, 20.5; range, 4 to 50) consisting of clinical examination and ultrasound (when an incisional hernia was clinically suspected). The median body weight was 80kg (mean, 82.9; range, 59 to 121), and the median body mass index was 27kg/m2 (mean, 26.3; range, 22.5 to 37.8). DISCUSSION Failure to adequately suture the fascial defect, infection, or suture disruption may lead to an incisional hernia or to ascitic fluid leakage in case of cirrhotic patients. 4 Trocar diameter and design, preexisting fascial defects, certain surgical procedures and patient-related factors have been identified as risk factors for port-site hernias. 2 Incisional hernias on trocar sites can occur even with incisions as small as 3mm. 5 Although some authors avoid fascial closure by using special trocars, 6,7 closing the 10- and 12-mm port sites is recommended. 8 Beside the classical hand-sutured technique, 29 original methods have been described for fascial closure. 9,10 The port-closure techniques were classified by Shaher 9 into 3 groups: (a) techniques that use assistance from inside the abdomen (requiring 2 additional ports), (b) techniques that use extracorporeal assistance (requiring 1 additional port), and (c) closure techniques that can be performed with or without visualization (without additional ports). As disadvantages, the majority of these techniques need special devices; some of them are time consuming, or need assistance from inside the abdomen, or are both time consuming and need assistance. The technique herein described can be listed in the third group according to Shaher's classification. We could not find any article in the literature that describes a similar technique. Its principle may seem odd, as all the other techniques using common surgical instruments aim to hold back the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the surgical wound as much as possible to better expose the fascia and to allow access of the instruments to the fascial level. On the contrary, this method involves minimal retraction of the surgical wound by using transcutaneous access of the needle. The final result is an optimal suture of the fascia through a minimal skin incision, allowing the placement of 2 sutures instead of one, thus assuring a stronger fascial closure. The method is also safer than the standard technique, because the tip of the needle enters the peritoneal cavity in an acute angle, rather than perpendicularly as occurs when the standard technique is used, reducing the risk of visceral injuries; in this way, the capacity of the needle to puncture intraperitoneal structure is reduced, the needle tip is better exposed during its course through the peritoneal cavity, and the intraperitoneal course of the needle is shortened, thus increasing the safety of the procedure. We believe that this method may find other applications in surgery when sutures are placed in narrow spaces. The fact that the series described in this article is relatively small may be considered a study drawback, because it is not statistically representative. However, the purpose of our study was not to prove the efficacy of this new technique by the statistical analysis of a large series. In our opinion, the efficacy of this new procedure in preventing port-site hernias is proven by the technique itself, which allows performance of an optimal fascial closure: large fascial margins included in the suture, and 2 sutures on small fascial wounds instead of only one (in comparison with the classical technique). Moreover, we considered that even the safety of this procedure did not need statistical confirmation, because the improved angle of the needle as it enters the peritoneal cavity passing through the fascia (an acute angle rather than a 90° angle) minimizes the risk of internal injuries. These technical advantages prove the efficacy of this new method for port-site closure. CONCLUSION This procedure is safe, easy to perform, virtually costless (uses common surgical instruments), and is not time consuming.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epidermal inclusion cyst of the umbilicus following abdominoplasty.

            The incidence of retained epidermal inclusion cyst at the site of the umbilicus following abdominoplasty has yet to be well documented. Compliant patients who are seen in scheduled follow-up, and who display signs of infection or wound issues at the site of the umbilicus, usually have these factors addressed before inclusion cysts manifest. Here, however, we present a patient who underwent abdominoplasty, lost her surgeon because of geographic relocation, presented to our office 1 year following surgery with a large retained umbilical epidermal inclusion cyst. This case gave us a unique opportunity to observe a well-developed retained umbilical epidermal inclusion cyst. Her evaluation and management are reviewed in an effort to familiarize the practicing plastic surgeon with a rare, but significant potential complication of abdominoplasty.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recurrent omphalitis in adults.

              Recurrent omphalitis is seen more frequently in children, but clinicians world-wide are occasionally challenged by cases of recurrent omphalitis in adults. Apart from folliculitis and infections associated with pilonidal cysts and piercing of the umbilical area, the clinician should consider the possibility of infected remnants of the allantois or the omphalomesenteric (vitelline) duct in adult patients with recurrent omphalitis. Imaging tests such as ultrasound and computed tomography scan frequently help to identify the exact cause of recurrent omphalitis. The combined surgical and medical management usually leads to cure of the problem.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Dermatol
                Ann Dermatol
                AD
                Annals of Dermatology
                The Korean Dermatological Association; The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology
                1013-9087
                2005-3894
                December 2021
                04 November 2021
                : 33
                : 6
                : 582-583
                Affiliations
                Department of Dermatology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Young-Jun Choi. Department of Dermatology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29 Saemunan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03181, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2001-2228, Fax: +82-2-2001-2236, youngjune.choi@ 123456samsung.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-7311
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6580-3889
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8795-0866
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7413-7139
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9501-2914
                Article
                10.5021/ad.2021.33.6.582
                8577907
                34858012
                159ef99e-bf0d-464b-a8c2-6f87b0df2db2
                Copyright © 2021 The Korean Dermatological Association and The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 March 2020
                : 24 June 2020
                : 01 July 2020
                Categories
                Brief Report

                Dermatology
                Dermatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article