2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to Bentham Journals, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Duration of Use of a Toothbrush on its Filament’s Tapering and Plaque Removal Efficacy

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives:

          Dental professionals often recommend changing toothbrushes every three months due to their wear and decreased plaque removal efficacy. This study aimed to assess the correlation of duration of use of a toothbrush and its wear and then the relationship of wear of toothbrush and Plaque Index (PI) of users and tapering of toothbrush filaments after three months of use was evaluated as well.

          Materials and Methods:

          In this study, 60 female students were enrolled according to the eligibility criteria and received a new set of toothbrush and toothpaste. They were requested to brush their teeth using the Bass technique twice a day for 2 minutes and the Ramfjord PI was measured at baseline and after 3 months. The wear of 47 toothbrushes after three months of use was evaluated using the Rawls index. Of collected 47 toothbrushes, 30 were randomly chosen and inspected under an electron microscope to determine the degree of tapering of bristles. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 via Spearman’s correlation coefficient, paired t-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (alpha=0.05).

          Results:

          After 3 months, the mean PI score significantly decreased (paired t-test, P=0.034). The PI at 3 months after use had no significant correlation with the toothbrush wear score (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, P=0.61) but the toothbrush wear score had a significant correlation with tapering of bristles (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, P=0.04). No significant association existed between PI at 3 months after use and tapering of bristles (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, P=0.69).

          Conclusion:

          The duration of use and wear of toothbrush alone do not affect the quality of plaque removal. Practicing Oral hygiene can affect the quality of plaque removal.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Primary prevention of periodontitis: managing gingivitis.

          Periodontitis is a ubiquitous and irreversible inflammatory condition and represents a significant public health burden. Severe periodontitis affects over 11% of adults, is a major cause of tooth loss impacting negatively upon speech, nutrition, quality of life and self-esteem, and has systemic inflammatory consequences. Periodontitis is preventable and treatment leads to reduced rates of tooth loss and improved quality of life. However, successful treatment necessitates behaviour change in patients to address lifestyle risk factors (e.g. smoking) and, most importantly, to attain and sustain high standards of daily plaque removal, lifelong. While mechanical plaque removal remains the bedrock of successful periodontal disease management, in high-risk patients it appears that the critical threshold for plaque accumulation to trigger periodontitis is low, and such patients may benefit from adjunctive agents for primary prevention of periodontitis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Periodontal Disease Index (PDI).

            S Ramfjord (2015)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Toothbrush wear in relation to toothbrushing effectiveness

              Abstract Objective To investigate to what extent the degree of toothbrush wear of 3‐month‐old manual toothbrushes influence plaque scores. Material and methods During a recently published study with a follow‐up of 1 year, all participants performed a similar basic home‐based oral hygiene regimen. Hence, they were instructed to brush for 2 minutes twice daily according to the Bass method technique and using a standard dentifrice containing sodium fluoride. Toothbrushes were turned in every 3‐month, and the degree of wear was scored. The mean plaque score data were additionally analysed and correlated with wear scores of the toothbrushes. Results For analysis, for each of 172 individual participants, a set of three identical, 3‐month‐old used toothbrushes were available. Toothbrush wear varied widely between participants. However, per patient, the 3‐month wear status of the three evaluated toothbrushes was strongly correlated (rho = 0.8, P < 0.0001). Participants who returned toothbrushes with extreme wear had significantly higher plaque scores than those who returned toothbrushes with no visible or light wear (P = 0.01). Conclusion Toothbrush wear per individual patient is fairly consistent. Toothbrushes with extreme wear were less effective than those with no or light wear. Therefore, bristle splaying appears to be a more appropriate measure of brush replacement time then the commonly used toothbrush age. Splaying of the outer tufts beyond the base of the toothbrush is a condition that indicates it is time to change the brush.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Open Dentistry Journal
                TODENTJ
                Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
                1874-2106
                August 18 2020
                August 18 2020
                : 14
                : 1
                : 384-389
                Article
                10.2174/1874210602014010384
                15862dc3-cd0b-4b33-a25c-f4acaa390bea
                © 2020

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

                History

                Medicine,Chemistry,Life sciences
                Medicine, Chemistry, Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article