11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Service Region Design for Urban Electric Vehicle Sharing Systems

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Emerging collaborative consumption business models have shown promise in terms of both generating business opportunities and enhancing the efficient use of resources. In the transportation domain, car-sharing models are being adopted on a mass scale in major metropolitan areas worldwide. This mode of servicized mobility bridges the resource efficiency of public transit and the flexibility of personal transportation. Beyond the significant potential to reduce car ownership, car sharing shows promise in supporting the adoption of fuel-efficient vehicles, such as electric vehicles (EVs), because of these vehicles’ special cost structure with high purchase but low operating costs. Recently, key players in the car-sharing business, such as Autolib’, car2go, and DriveNow, have begun to employ EVs in an operations model that accommodates one-way trips. On the one hand (and particularly in free-floating car sharing), the one-way model results in significant improvements in coverage of travel needs and therefore in adoption potential compared with the conventional round-trip-only model (advocated by Zipcar, for example). On the other hand, this model poses tremendous planning and operational challenges. In this work, we study the planning problem faced by service providers in designing a geographical service region in which to operate the service. This decision entails trade-offs between maximizing customer catchment by covering travel needs and controlling fleet operation costs. We develop a mathematical programming model that incorporates details of both customer adoption behavior and fleet management (including EV repositioning and charging) under imbalanced travel patterns. To address inherent planning uncertainty with regard to adoption patterns, we employ a distributionally robust optimization framework that informs robust decisions to overcome possible ambiguity (or lacking) of data. Mathematically, the problem can be approximated by a mixed integer second-order cone program, which is computationally tractable with practical scale data. Applying this approach to the case of car2go’s service with real operations data, we address a number of planning questions and suggest that there is potential for the future development of this service.

          The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0611 .

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Sustainable Operations Management

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Robust Convex Optimization

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Price of Robustness

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
                M&SOM
                Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
                1523-4614
                1526-5498
                May 2017
                May 2017
                : 19
                : 2
                : 309-327
                Affiliations
                [1 ]NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245
                [2 ]Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China 200030
                [4 ]Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
                Article
                10.1287/msom.2016.0611
                14d678df-ace7-4116-962a-ce3dcf11ba02
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article