13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The COVID-19 baby bump in the United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          We show that US fertility rates fell by much less than predicted by standard economic models in 2020, masking two separate patterns. The number of births to foreign-born women fell sharply in early 2020, while US-born women saw little decline in percentage terms and experienced a “baby bump” in 2021. Data from California suggest that the postpandemic increase in fertility among US-born women continued through February 2023. Not only was this the first recession in recent history not followed by a baby bust, but the 2021 baby bump marked the first reversal in declining fertility rates since the Great Recession. Increases in first births and births to college-educated mothers were especially large in 2021.

          Abstract

          We use natality microdata covering the universe of US. births for 2015 to 2021 and California births from 2015 through February 2023 to examine childbearing responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that 60% of the 2020 decline in US fertility rates was driven by sharp reductions in births to foreign-born mothers although births to this group comprised only 22% of all US births in 2019. This decline started in January 2020. In contrast, the COVID-19 recession resulted in an overall “baby bump” among US-born mothers, which marked the first reversal in declining fertility rates since the Great Recession. Births to US-born mothers fell by 31,000 in 2020 relative to a prepandemic trend but increased by 71,000 in 2021. The data for California suggest that US births remained elevated through February 2023. The baby bump was most pronounced for first births and women under age 25, suggesting that the pandemic led some women to start families earlier. Above age 25, the baby bump was most pronounced for women aged 30 to 34 and women with a college education. The 2021 to 2022 baby bump is especially remarkable given the large declines in fertility rates that would have been projected by standard statistical models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reductions in 2020 US life expectancy due to COVID-19 and the disproportionate impact on the Black and Latino populations

          COVID-19 has resulted in a staggering death toll in the United States: over 215,000 by mid-October 2020, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Black and Latino Americans have experienced a disproportionate burden of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, reflecting persistent structural inequalities that increase risk of exposure to COVID-19 and mortality risk for those infected. We estimate life expectancy at birth and at age 65 y for 2020, for the total US population and by race and ethnicity, using four scenarios of deaths—one in which the COVID-19 pandemic had not occurred and three including COVID-19 mortality projections produced by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Our medium estimate indicates a reduction in US life expectancy at birth of 1.13 y to 77.48 y, lower than any year since 2003. We also project a 0.87-y reduction in life expectancy at age 65 y. The Black and Latino populations are estimated to experience declines in life expectancy at birth of 2.10 and 3.05 y, respectively, both of which are several times the 0.68-y reduction for Whites. These projections imply an increase of nearly 40% in the Black−White life expectancy gap, from 3.6 y to over 5 y, thereby eliminating progress made in reducing this differential since 2006. Latinos, who have consistently experienced lower mortality than Whites (a phenomenon known as the Latino or Hispanic paradox), would see their more than 3-y survival advantage reduced to less than 1 y.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Economic Recession and Fertility in the Developed World

            This article reviews research on the effects of economic recessions on fertility in the developed world. We study how economic downturns, as measured by various indicators, especially by declining GDP levels, falling consumer confidence, and rising unemployment, were found to affect fertility. We also discuss particular mechanisms through which the recession may have influenced fertility behavior, including the effects of economic uncertainty, falling income, changes in the housing market, and rising enrollment in higher education, and also factors that influence fertility indirectly such as declining marriage rates. Most studies find that fertility tends to be pro-cyclical and often rises and declines with the ups and downs of the business cycle. Usually, these aggregate effects are relatively small (typically, a few percentage points) and of short durations; in addition they often influence especially the timing of childbearing and in most cases do not leave an imprint on cohort fertility levels. Therefore, major long-term fertility shifts often continue seemingly uninterrupted during the recession—including the fertility declines before and during the Great Depression of the 1930s and before and during the oil shock crises of the 1970s. Changes in the opportunity costs of childbearing and fertility behavior during economic downturn vary by sex, age, social status, and number of children; childless young adults are usually most affected. Furthermore, various policies and institutions may modify or even reverse the relationship between recessions and fertility. The first evidence pertaining to the recent recession falls in line with these findings. In most countries, the recession has brought a decline in the number of births and fertility rates, often marking a sharp halt to the previous decade of rising fertility rates.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Season of Birth and Later Outcomes: Old Questions, New Answers.

              Season of birth is associated with later outcomes; what drives this association remains unclear. We consider a new explanation: variation in maternal characteristics. We document large changes in maternal characteristics for births throughout the year; winter births are disproportionally realized by teenagers and the unmarried. Family background controls explain nearly half of season-of-birth's relation to adult outcomes. Seasonality in maternal characteristics is driven by women trying to conceive; we find no seasonality among unwanted births. Prior seasonality-in-fertility research focuses on conditions at conception; here expected conditions at birth drive variation in maternal characteristics while conditions at conception are unimportant.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                15 August 2023
                22 August 2023
                15 August 2023
                : 120
                : 34
                : e2222075120
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Economics, University of California , Los Angeles, CA 90024
                [2] bNational Bureau of Economic Research , Cambridge, MA 02138
                [3] cCenter for Health and Wellbeing, Princeton University , Princeton, NJ 08544
                [4] dSchool of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University , Evanston, IL 60208
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: jcurrie@ 123456princeton.edu .

                Edited by Robert Moffitt, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; received December 30, 2022; accepted July 12, 2023

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9220-9113
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0298-5037
                Article
                202222075
                10.1073/pnas.2222075120
                10450661
                37582121
                14b3154d-309f-43e1-b973-0a0ee41e3702
                Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 30 December 2022
                : 12 July 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 11, Words: 9006
                Funding
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), FundRef 100009633;
                Award ID: P2CHD041022
                Award Recipient : Martha Bailey
                Categories
                covid-19, Coronavirus (COVID-19)
                research-article, Research Article
                demo, Demography
                530
                Social Sciences
                Demography
                Custom metadata
                free

                covid-19,fertility,baby bump
                covid-19, fertility, baby bump

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content400

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors158