6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Why treatment efficacy on breathlessness in laboratory but not daily life trials? The importance of standardized exertion.

      1
      Current opinion in supportive and palliative care
      Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Treatments for chronic breathlessness, including opioids and oxygen, have shown efficacy in the controlled laboratory setting, whereas effects have been inconsistent or absent in trials in daily life. This review discusses the lack of standardized exertion as a potential cause of false negative findings for breathlessness in daily life.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Curr Opin Support Palliat Care
          Current opinion in supportive and palliative care
          Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
          1751-4266
          1751-4258
          September 2019
          : 13
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
          Article
          10.1097/SPC.0000000000000444
          31246594
          149d5a66-2f20-4c04-8204-603fdb47fc3f
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article