20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lost bioscapes: Floristic and arthropod diversity coincident with 12 th century Polynesian settlement, Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Islands

      research-article
      1 , 2 , * , , 3 , 3
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Knowledge of biodiversity in the past, and the timing, nature, and drivers of human-induced ecological change, is important for gaining deep time perspectives and for modern conservation efforts. The Marquesas Islands (Polynesia) are one of the world’s most remote archipelagos and illustrate the vulnerability of indigenous bioscapes to anthropogenic activities. Characterised by high levels of endemism across many biotic groups, the full spectrum of the group’s flora and fauna is nonetheless incompletely known. Several centuries of Polynesian settlement reshaped biotic communities in ways that are not yet fully understood, and historically-introduced mammalian herbivores have devastated the indigenous lowland flora. We report here on archaeological recovery of a diverse assemblage of plant and arthropod subfossils from a waterlogged deposit on the largest Marquesan island: Nuku Hiva. These materials offer new perspectives on the composition of lowland plant and arthropod communities pene-contemporaneous with human arrival. Bayesian analysis of multiple 14C results from short-lived materials date the assemblages to the mid-12 th century AD ( 1129–1212 cal. AD, 95.4% HPD). Evidence for human activities in the catchment coincident with deposit formation includes Polynesian associated arthropods, microcharcoal, and an adzed timber. Plant macrofossils (seeds, fruits, vegetative structures) and microfossils (pollen, phytoliths) reveal coastal and lowland wet-moist forest communities unlike those observed today. Several apparently extinct taxa are identified, along with extant taxa currently constrained to high altitude and/or interior areas. A diverse inventory of subfossil arthropods—the first pre-18 th century records for the islands—includes more than 100 distinct taxa, with several new archipelago records and one previously unreported for eastern Polynesia. The assemblages provide new insights into lowland Marquesan forest communities coincident with human arrival, and portend the considerable anthropogenic transformations that followed. These records also have implications for human colonisation of the Marquesas Islands and East Polynesia at large.

          Related collections

          Most cited references135

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          SHCal20 SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE CALIBRATION, 0–55,000 YEARS CAL BP

          Early researchers of radiocarbon levels in Southern Hemisphere tree rings identified a variable North-South hemispheric offset, necessitating construction of a separate radiocarbon calibration curve for the South. We present here SHCal20, a revised calibration curve from 0–55,000 cal BP, based upon SHCal13 and fortified by the addition of 14 new tree-ring data sets in the 2140–0, 3520–3453, 3608–3590 and 13,140–11,375 cal BP time intervals. We detail the statistical approaches used for curve construction and present recommendations for the use of the Northern Hemisphere curve (IntCal20), the Southern Hemisphere curve (SHCal20) and suggest where application of an equal mixture of the curves might be more appropriate. Using our Bayesian spline with errors-in-variables methodology, and based upon a comparison of Southern Hemisphere tree-ring data compared with contemporaneous Northern Hemisphere data, we estimate the mean Southern Hemisphere offset to be 36 ± 27 14 C yrs older.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Ecological consequences of human niche construction: Examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions

            The exhibition of increasingly intensive and complex niche construction behaviors through time is a key feature of human evolution, culminating in the advanced capacity for ecosystem engineering exhibited by Homo sapiens . A crucial outcome of such behaviors has been the dramatic reshaping of the global biosphere, a transformation whose early origins are increasingly apparent from cumulative archaeological and paleoecological datasets. Such data suggest that, by the Late Pleistocene, humans had begun to engage in activities that have led to alterations in the distributions of a vast array of species across most, if not all, taxonomic groups. Changes to biodiversity have included extinctions, extirpations, and shifts in species composition, diversity, and community structure. We outline key examples of these changes, highlighting findings from the study of new datasets, like ancient DNA (aDNA), stable isotopes, and microfossils, as well as the application of new statistical and computational methods to datasets that have accumulated significantly in recent decades. We focus on four major phases that witnessed broad anthropogenic alterations to biodiversity—the Late Pleistocene global human expansion, the Neolithic spread of agriculture, the era of island colonization, and the emergence of early urbanized societies and commercial networks. Archaeological evidence documents millennia of anthropogenic transformations that have created novel ecosystems around the world. This record has implications for ecological and evolutionary research, conservation strategies, and the maintenance of ecosystem services, pointing to a significant need for broader cross-disciplinary engagement between archaeology and the biological and environmental sciences.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Distinction between Grain Size and Mineral Composition in Sedimentary-Rock Nomenclature

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                30 March 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 3
                : e0265224
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Anthropology, School of Social Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
                [2 ] Te Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence for Complex Systems, The University of Auckland (Host), Auckland, New Zealand
                [3 ] School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
                New York State Museum, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5041-5106
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2031-5133
                Article
                PONE-D-21-37082
                10.1371/journal.pone.0265224
                8967401
                35353828
                1488343d-edb1-4bef-a15e-9e559f113b3b
                © 2022 Allen et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 November 2021
                : 24 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 13, Tables: 6, Pages: 38
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Auckland, Faculty of Arts
                Award ID: 3700147
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001023, Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering;
                Award ID: 06/002, 07/001, 09/005
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Australian Research Council
                Award ID: DE130101453
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission, Te Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence for Complex Systems
                Award ID: UOA 9167-3705716
                Award Recipient :
                Archaeological excavations, sample collection, 14C dating and some specialised analyses were supported by University of Auckland Faculty of Arts Research Development Fund [Grant no. 3700147 to MSA], AMS analyses by the Australian Institute of Nuclear Sciences & Engineering Ltd. ( https://www.ainse.edu.au) [Grant nos. 06/002, 07/001, and 09/005 to MSA] and the arthropod and botanical analyses by an Australian Research Council DECRA ( https://www.arc.gov.au) [Grant no. DE130101453 to NP]. MSA received support funding from New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission, Te Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence for Complex Systems ( https://www.tepunahamatatini.ac.nz) Grant no. UOA 9167-3705716. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Earth Sciences
                Geomorphology
                Topography
                Landforms
                Islands
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Ethnicities
                Austronesian People
                Polynesian People
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Forests
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Paleontology
                Fossils
                Subfossils
                Earth Sciences
                Paleontology
                Fossils
                Subfossils
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Entomology
                Insects
                Beetles
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Insects
                Beetles
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Insects
                Beetles
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Entomology
                Insects
                Hymenoptera
                Ants
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Insects
                Hymenoptera
                Ants
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Insects
                Hymenoptera
                Ants
                Earth Sciences
                Geology
                Petrology
                Sediment
                Earth Sciences
                Geology
                Sedimentary Geology
                Sediment
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article