6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A microsporidian impairs Plasmodium falciparum transmission in Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A possible malaria control approach involves the dissemination in mosquitoes of inherited symbiotic microbes to block Plasmodium transmission. However, in the Anopheles gambiae complex, the primary African vectors of malaria, there are limited reports of inherited symbionts that impair transmission. We show that a vertically transmitted microsporidian symbiont ( Microsporidia MB) in the An. gambiae complex can impair Plasmodium transmission. Microsporidia MB is present at moderate prevalence in geographically dispersed populations of An. arabiensis in Kenya, localized to the mosquito midgut and ovaries, and is not associated with significant reductions in adult host fecundity or survival. Field-collected Microsporidia MB infected An. arabiensis tested negative for P. falciparum gametocytes and, on experimental infection with P. falciparum, sporozoites aren’t detected in Microsporidia MB infected mosquitoes. As a microbe that impairs Plasmodium transmission that is non-virulent and vertically transmitted, Microsporidia MB could be investigated as a strategy to limit malaria transmission.

          Abstract

          Mircobial symbionts of mosquitoes can affect transmission of human pathogens. Here, Herren et al. identify a microsporidian symbiont in Anopheles gambiae that impairs transmission without affecting mosquito fecundity or survival.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Natural microbe-mediated refractoriness to Plasmodium infection in Anopheles gambiae.

          Malaria parasite transmission depends on the successful transition of Plasmodium through discrete developmental stages in the lumen of the mosquito midgut. Like the human intestinal tract, the mosquito midgut contains a diverse microbial flora, which may compromise the ability of Plasmodium to establish infection. We have identified an Enterobacter bacterium isolated from wild mosquito populations in Zambia that renders the mosquito resistant to infection with the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum by interfering with parasite development before invasion of the midgut epithelium. Phenotypic analyses showed that the anti-Plasmodium mechanism requires small populations of replicating bacteria and is mediated through a mosquito-independent interaction with the malaria parasite. We show that this anti-Plasmodium effect is largely caused by bacterial generation of reactive oxygen species.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms

            Background SINEs (Short INterspersed Elements) are homoplasy-free and co-dominant genetic markers which are considered to represent useful tools for population genetic studies, and could help clarifying the speciation processes ongoing within the major malaria vector in Africa, Anopheles gambiae s.s. Here, we report the results of the analysis of the insertion polymorphism of a nearly 200 bp-long SINE (SINE200) within genome areas of high differentiation (i.e. "speciation islands") of M and S A. gambiae molecular forms. Methods A SINE-PCR approach was carried out on thirteen SINE200 insertions in M and S females collected along the whole range of distribution of A. gambiae s.s. in sub-Saharan Africa. Ten specimens each for Anopheles arabiensis, Anopheles melas, Anopheles quadriannulatus A and 15 M/S hybrids from laboratory crosses were also analysed. Results Eight loci were successfully amplified and were found to be specific for A. gambiae s.s.: 5 on 2L chromosome and one on X chromosome resulted monomorphic, while two loci positioned respectively on 2R (i.e. S200 2R12D) and X (i.e. S200 X6.1) chromosomes were found to be polymorphic. S200 2R12D was homozygote for the insertion in most S-form samples, while intermediate levels of polymorphism were shown in M-form, resulting in an overall high degree of genetic differentiation between molecular forms (Fst = 0.46 p < 0.001) and within M-form (Fst = 0.46 p < 0.001). The insertion of S200 X6.1 was found to be fixed in all M- and absent in all S-specimens. This led to develop a novel easy-to-use PCR approach to straightforwardly identify A. gambiae molecular forms. This novel approach allows to overcome the constraints associated with markers on the rDNA region commonly used for M and S identification. In fact, it is based on a single copy and irreversible SINE200 insertion and, thus, is not subjected to peculiar evolutionary patterns affecting rDNA markers, e.g. incomplete homogenization of the arrays through concerted evolution and/or mixtures of M and S IGS-sequences among the arrays of single chromatids. Conclusion The approach utilized allowed to develop new easy-to-use co-dominant markers for the analysis of genetic differentiation between M and S-forms and opens new perspectives in the study of the speciation process ongoing within A. gambiae.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Driving mosquito refractoriness toPlasmodium falciparumwith engineered symbiotic bacteria

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jherren@icipe.org
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                4 May 2020
                4 May 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 2187
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1794 5158, GRID grid.419326.b, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), ; Kasarani, Nairobi Kenya
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0393 3981, GRID grid.301713.7, MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, ; 464 Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G61 1QH UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2019 0495, GRID grid.10604.33, Centre for Biotechnology and Bioinformatics (CEBIB), , University of Nairobi, ; Nairobi, Kenya
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2019 0495, GRID grid.10604.33, Department of Biochemistry, , University of Nairobi, ; Nairobi, Kenya
                [5 ]University of the Witwaterstrand, Wits Research Institute for Malaria, Johannesburg, South Africa
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0606 5382, GRID grid.10306.34, Wellcome Sanger Institute, ; Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, CB10 1SA UK
                [7 ]Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences Technology & Innovation, Nairobi, Kenya
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2239-7275
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-5417
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1324-7825
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-0332
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1962-5583
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1330-1545
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5831-2379
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-3428
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-0305
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9541-3611
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3006-2080
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2775-3542
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1573-2477
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2678-1832
                Article
                16121
                10.1038/s41467-020-16121-y
                7198529
                32366903
                13df4b8a-bf22-421f-a037-93e4d7ce31df
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 20 September 2019
                : 11 April 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100004440, Wellcome Trust (Wellcome);
                Award ID: 107372
                Award ID: 200274
                Award ID: 200274
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000268, RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC);
                Award ID: BB/R005338/1, sub-grant AV/PP015/1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Uncategorized
                parasite biology,malaria,parasitic infection
                Uncategorized
                parasite biology, malaria, parasitic infection

                Comments

                Comment on this article