22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dietary flavonoid intake and risk of incident depression in midlife and older women 1 2 3

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The impact of dietary flavonoid intakes on risk of depression is unclear.

          Objective: We prospectively examined associations between estimated habitual intakes of dietary flavonoids and depression risk.

          Design: We followed 82,643 women without a previous history of depression at baseline from the Nurses’ Health Study [(NHS) aged 53–80 y] and the Nurses’ Health Study II [(NHSII) aged 36–55 y]. Intakes of total flavonoids and subclasses (flavonols, flavones, flavanones, anthocyanins, flavan-3-ols, polymeric flavonoids, and proanthocyanidins) were calculated from validated food-frequency questionnaires collected every 2–4 y. Depression was defined as physician- or clinician-diagnosed depression or antidepressant use and was self-reported in response to periodic questionnaires. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to examine associations.

          Results: A total of 10,752 incident depression cases occurred during a 10-y follow-up. Inverse associations between flavonol, flavone, and flavanone intakes and depression risk were observed. Pooled multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 0.93 (0.88, 0.99), 0.92 (0.86, 0.98), and 0.90 (0.85, 0.96) when comparing the highest (quintile 5) with the lowest (quintile 1) quintiles, respectively, with evidence of linear trends across quintiles ( P-trend = 0.0004–0.08). In flavonoid-rich food-based analyses, the HR was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.91) among participants who consumed ≥2 servings citrus fruit or juices/d compared with <1 serving/wk. In the NHS only, total flavonoids, polymers, and proanthocyanidin intakes showed significantly (9–12%) lower depression risks. In analyses among late-life NHS participants (aged ≥65 y at baseline or during follow-up), for whom we were able to incorporate depressive symptoms into the outcome definition, higher intakes of all flavonoid subclasses except for flavan-3-ols were associated with significantly lower depression risk; flavones and proanthocyanidins showed the strongest associations (HR for both: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.77, 0.90).

          Conclusions: Higher flavonoid intakes may be associated with lower depression risk, particularly among older women. Further studies are needed to confirm these associations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study

          The Lancet, 349(9064), 1498-1504
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale).

            We derived and tested a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for reliability and validity among a sample of well older adults in a large Health Maintenance Organization. The 10-item screening questionnaire, the CESD-10, showed good predictive accuracy when compared to the full-length 20-item version of the CES-D (kappa = .97, P or = 16 for the full-length questionnaire and > or = 10 for the 10-item version. We discuss other potential cutoff values. The CESD-10 showed an expected positive correlation with poorer health status scores (r = .37) and a strong negative correlation with positive affect (r = -.63). Retest correlations for the CESD-10 were comparable to those in other studies (r = .71). We administered the CESD-10 again after 12 months, and scores were stable with strong correlation of r = .59.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Food-based validation of a dietary questionnaire: the effects of week-to-week variation in food consumption.

              The reproducibility and validity of responses for 55 specific foods and beverages on a self-administered food frequency questionnaire were evaluated. One hundred and seventy three women from the Nurses' Health Study completed the questionnaire twice approximately 12 months apart and also recorded their food consumption for seven consecutive days, four times during the one-year interval. For the 55 foods, the mean of correlation coefficients between frequencies of intake for first versus second questionnaire was 0.57 (range = 0.24 for fruit punch to 0.93 for beer). The mean of correlation coefficients between the dietary records and first questionnaire was 0.44 (range = 0.09 for yellow squash to 0.83 for beer and tea) and between the dietary records and the second questionnaire was 0.52 (range = 0.08 for spinach to 0.90 for tea). Ratios of within- to between-person variance for the 55 foods were computed using the mean four one-week dietary records for each person as replicate measurements. For most foods this ratio was greater than 1.0 (geometric mean of ratios = 1.88), ranging from 0.25 (skimmed milk) to 14.76 (spinach). Correlation coefficients comparing questionnaire and dietary record for the 55 foods were corrected for the within-person variation (mean corrected value = 0.55 for dietary record versus first questionnaire and 0.66 versus the second). Mean daily amounts of each food calculated by the questionnaire and by the dietary record were also compared; the observed differences suggested that responses to the questionnaire tended to over-represent socially desirable foods. This analysis documents the validity and reproducibility of the questionnaire for measuring specific foods and beverages, as well as the large within-person variation for food intake measured by dietary records. Differences in the degree of validity for specific foods revealed in this type of analysis can be useful in improving questionnaire design and in interpreting findings from epidemiological studies that use the instrument.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Am J Clin Nutr
                Am. J. Clin. Nutr
                ajcn
                The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
                American Society for Nutrition
                0002-9165
                1938-3207
                September 2016
                13 July 2016
                13 July 2016
                : 104
                : 3
                : 704-714
                Affiliations
                [4 ]Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, and
                [5 ]Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA;
                [6 ]Department of Nutrition, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom; and
                [7 ]Departments of Nutrition and
                [8 ]Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
                Author notes
                [* ]To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ookereke@ 123456partners.org .
                [1]

                Supported by NIH research grants R01 MH091448, UM1 CA186107, and UM1 CA176726. The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (United Kingdom) also supported this study (BB/J004545/1). AC is a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award Holder. This is an open access article distributed under the CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                [2]

                The funders of this study had no role in its design or conduct; in the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

                [3]

                Supplemental Figure 1 and Supplemental Tables 1–5 are available from the “Online Supporting Material” link in the online posting of the article and from the same link in the online table of contents at http://ajcn.nutrition.org.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1649-3191
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-5602
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1458-7597
                Article
                124545
                10.3945/ajcn.115.124545
                4997290
                27413131
                13601802-f5a7-4538-ba37-7fbff960ed09

                This is an open access article distributed under the CC-BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 25 September 2015
                : 6 June 2016
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Categories
                5006
                Nutritional Epidemiology and Public Health

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                depression,epidemiology,flavonoids,geriatrics,nurses’ health study,prospective cohort

                Comments

                Comment on this article