1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a digital guided self-management intervention to support transition from intensive care to community care in anorexia nervosa (TRIANGLE): pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          There is uncertainty regarding how best to support patients with anorexia nervosa following inpatient or day care treatment. This study evaluated the impact of augmenting intensive treatment with a digital, guided, self-management intervention (ECHOMANTRA) for patients with anorexia nervosa and their carers.

          Methods

          In this pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation, patients with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa or atypical anorexia nervosa, aged 16+ and attending one of the 31 inpatient or day-patient services in the UK were randomised with one of their carers to receive ECHOMANTRA plus treatment as usual (TAU), or TAU alone. ECHOMANTRA was hosted on a digital platform and included a workbook, recovery-oriented video-clips and online facilitated groups (patients only, carers only, joint patient-carer). Participants were randomised on a 1:1 ratio using a minimisation algorithm to stratify by site (N = 31) and severity (defined by BMI <15 and ≥ 15 kg/m 2 at baseline). The primary outcome was patient depression, anxiety, and stress at 12 months. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between trial arms on an intention-to-treat basis (ITT). This trial is registered with the ISRSTN registry, ISRCTN14644379.

          Findings

          Between July 01, 2017 and July 20, 2020, 371 patient-carer dyads were enrolled and randomly assigned to ECHOMANTRA + TAU (N = 185) or TAU alone (N = 186). There were no significant differences between trial arms with regards to the primary outcome (completed by N = 143 patients in the TAU group, Mean = 61.7, SD = 29.4 and N = 109 patients in the ECHOMANTRA + TAU group, Mean = 58.3, SD = 26.9; estimated mean difference 0.48 points; 95% CI −5.36 to 6.33; p = 0.87). Differences on secondary outcomes were small and non-significant (standardised effect size estimates ≤0.25). Five patients died (2 from suicide and 3 from physical complications) over the course of the trial, and this was unrelated to their participation in the study.

          Interpretation

          ECHOMANTRA added to TAU was not superior to TAU alone in reducing patient depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. This may be explained by limited engagement with the intervention materials and changes in usual care practices since the beginning of the trial.

          Funding

          doi 10.13039/501100000272, National Institute for Health Research; (NIHR), under its doi 10.13039/501100000664, Health Technology Assessment Programme; (HTA) Programme (Grant Reference Number 14/68/09). doi 10.13039/100019418, NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre; (BRC), doi 10.13039/100009362, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust; and doi 10.13039/100013376, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience; , and King’s College London. doi 10.13039/501100023232, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London; (NIHR ARC South London) at doi 10.13039/100010872, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; .

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice

          Multiple imputation by chained equations is a flexible and practical approach to handling missing data. We describe the principles of the method and show how to impute categorical and quantitative variables, including skewed variables. We give guidance on how to specify the imputation model and how many imputations are needed. We describe the practical analysis of multiply imputed data, including model building and model checking. We stress the limitations of the method and discuss the possible pitfalls. We illustrate the ideas using a data set in mental health, giving Stata code fragments. 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.

            To describe the psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), a brief measure of the prosocial behavior and psychopathology of 3-16-year-olds that can be completed by parents, teachers, or youths. A nationwide epidemiological sample of 10,438 British 5-15-year-olds obtained SDQs from 96% of parents, 70% of teachers, and 91% of 11-15-year-olds. Blind to the SDQ findings, all subjects were also assigned DSM-IVdiagnoses based on a clinical review of detailed interview measures. The predicted five-factor structure (emotional, conduct, hyperactivity-inattention, peer, prosocial) was confirmed. Internalizing and externalizing scales were relatively "uncontaminated" by one another. Reliability was generally satisfactory, whether judged by internal consistency (mean Cronbach a: .73), cross-informant correlation (mean: 0.34), or retest stability after 4 to 6 months (mean: 0.62). SDQ scores above the 90th percentile predicted a substantially raised probability of independently diagnosed psychiatric disorders (mean odds ratio: 15.7 for parent scales, 15.2 for teacher scales, 6.2 for youth scales). The reliability and validity of the SDQ make it a useful brief measure of the adjustment and psychopathology of children and adolescents.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?

              A detailed comparison was made of two methods for assessing the features of eating disorders. An investigator-based interview was compared with a self-report questionnaire based directly on that interview. A number of important discrepancies emerged. Although the two measures performed similarly with respect to the assessment of unambiguous behavioral features such as self-induced vomiting and dieting, the self-report questionnaire generated higher scores than the interview when assessing more complex features such as binge eating and concerns about shape. Both methods underestimated body weight.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                eClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                eClinicalMedicine
                Elsevier
                2589-5370
                27 May 2024
                July 2024
                27 May 2024
                : 73
                : 102645
                Affiliations
                [a ]Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
                [b ]Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
                [c ]DIS Study Abroad in Scandinavia, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [d ]Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
                [e ]Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
                [f ]South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [g ]Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
                [h ]Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy. valentina.cardi@ 123456unipd.it
                [i]

                Joint last authors.

                Article
                S2589-5370(24)00224-4 102645
                10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102645
                11152892
                38841708
                134eeb8a-9639-4f38-a1bb-d1b092bce6bd
                © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 October 2023
                : 24 April 2024
                : 30 April 2024
                Categories
                Articles

                anorexia nervosa,carers,digital,groups,psychoeducation,recovery,self-management

                Comments

                Comment on this article