53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      State of the Evidence Traffic Lights 2019: Systematic Review of Interventions for Preventing and Treating Children with Cerebral Palsy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose of Review

          Cerebral palsy is the most common physical disability of childhood, but the rate is falling, and severity is lessening. We conducted a systematic overview of best available evidence (2012–2019), appraising evidence using GRADE and the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System and then aggregated the new findings with our previous 2013 findings. This article summarizes the best available evidence interventions for preventing and managing cerebral palsy in 2019.

          Recent Findings

          Effective prevention strategies include antenatal corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, caffeine, and neonatal hypothermia. Effective allied health interventions include acceptance and commitment therapy, action observations, bimanual training, casting, constraint-induced movement therapy, environmental enrichment, fitness training, goal-directed training, hippotherapy, home programs, literacy interventions, mobility training, oral sensorimotor, oral sensorimotor plus electrical stimulation, pressure care, stepping stones triple P, strength training, task-specific training, treadmill training, partial body weight support treadmill training, and weight-bearing. Effective medical and surgical interventions include anti-convulsants, bisphosphonates, botulinum toxin, botulinum toxin plus occupational therapy, botulinum toxin plus casting, diazepam, dentistry, hip surveillance, intrathecal baclofen, scoliosis correction, selective dorsal rhizotomy, and umbilical cord blood cell therapy.

          Summary

          We have provided guidance about what works and what does not to inform decision-making, and highlighted areas for more research.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s11910-020-1022-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references241

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

          Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage.

            This paper reviews 10 principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity and considerations in applying them to the damaged brain. Neuroscience research using a variety of models of learning, neurological disease, and trauma are reviewed from the perspective of basic neuroscientists but in a manner intended to be useful for the development of more effective clinical rehabilitation interventions. Neural plasticity is believed to be the basis for both learning in the intact brain and relearning in the damaged brain that occurs through physical rehabilitation. Neuroscience research has made significant advances in understanding experience-dependent neural plasticity, and these findings are beginning to be integrated with research on the degenerative and regenerative effects of brain damage. The qualities and constraints of experience-dependent neural plasticity are likely to be of major relevance to rehabilitation efforts in humans with brain damage. However, some research topics need much more attention in order to enhance the translation of this area of neuroscience to clinical research and practice. The growing understanding of the nature of brain plasticity raises optimism that this knowledge can be capitalized upon to improve rehabilitation efforts and to optimize functional outcome.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy

              To address the need for a standardized system to classify the gross motor function of children with cerebral palsy, the authors developed a five-level classification system analogous to the staging and grading systems used in medicine. Nominal group process and Delphi survey consensus methods were used to examine content validity and revise the classification system until consensus among 48 experts (physical therapists, occupational therapists, and developmental pediatricians with expertise in cerebral palsy) was achieved. Interrater reliability (kappa) was 0.55 for children less than 2 years of age and 0.75 for children 2 to 12 years of age. The classification system has application for clinical practice, research, teaching, and administration.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                inovak@cerebralpalsy.org.au
                Journal
                Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep
                Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep
                Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
                Springer US (New York )
                1528-4042
                1534-6293
                21 February 2020
                21 February 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 2
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Discipline of Child & Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, , The University of Sydney, ; PO Box 6427, Frenchs Forest, Sydney, NSW 2086 Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.419789.a, ISNI 0000 0000 9295 3933, Department of Paediatric Neurology, , Monash Health, ; Clayton, Victoria Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.1002.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7857, Department of Paediatrics, , Monash University, ; Clayton, Victoria Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.413973.b, ISNI 0000 0000 9690 854X, Grace Centre for Newborn Care, , Children’s Hospital at Westmead, ; Westmead, New South Wales Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.410667.2, ISNI 0000 0004 0625 8600, Department of Paediatric Rehabilitation, Kids Rehab WA, , Perth Children’s Hospital, ; Perth, Australia
                [6 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, , Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.1029.a, ISNI 0000 0000 9939 5719, Allied and Public Helath, Faculty of Health Sciences, , Western Sydney University, ; Sydney, New South Wales Australia
                [8 ]GRID grid.1029.a, ISNI 0000 0000 9939 5719, Allied and Public Helath, Faculty of Health Sciences, , Western Sydney University, ; Sydney, New South Wales Australia
                [9 ]GRID grid.411958.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2194 1270, School of Allied Health, , Australian Catholic University, ; North Sydney, New South Wales Australia
                Article
                1022
                10.1007/s11910-020-1022-z
                7035308
                32086598
                133a3e74-08f7-4beb-a336-3cbf485094c2
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                Categories
                Pediatric Neurology (WE Kaufmann, Section Editor)
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

                Neurosciences
                cerebral palsy,systematic review,traffic light system,evidence based,grade
                Neurosciences
                cerebral palsy, systematic review, traffic light system, evidence based, grade

                Comments

                Comment on this article