10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Molecular prevalence of Anaplasma marginale and associated risk factors in beef cattle herds from Ohio: a cross-sectional study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          To estimate the prevalence of Anaplasma marginale, the causative agent of bovine anaplasmosis, in beef herds from Ohio; evaluate farm identity and animal age as risk factors; and examine serologic cross-reactivity with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, an emerging disease agent.

          ANIMALS

          4 beef cattle herds (n = 327) sampled between December 2020 and December 2021.

          PROCEDURES

          To address the broader investigation of characterizing Anaplasma spp and genotypes in Ohio, herds with a history of clinical anaplasmosis were targeted. Blood was screened for antibodies to Anaplasma spp using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with seropositive samples tested for A marginale using real-time PCR. If negative, samples were also tested for A phagocytophilum.

          RESULTS

          We estimated a statewide molecular prevalence of 38.53% (95% CI, 33.26% to 43.81%), with some farms exhibiting higher prevalence than others (19.40% to 56.86%). Accounting for farm identity, the odds of an animal becoming infected increased by 1.41 (95% CI, 1.28 to 1.58) for every year in age. Forty-four animals tested seropositive but PCR negative for A marginale. Out of these, 2 tested positive for A phagocytophilum.

          CLINICAL RELEVANCE

          Our study was the first to report prevalence estimates for bovine anaplasmosis in Ohio. Although prevalence was higher than other states, this is most likely due to our sampling approach. Our results suggested that older animals are more likely to be infected with A marginale, and when animals are instead infected with A phagocytophilum, serology alone can be misleading wherever the 2 species co-occur. Our study can guide wider epidemiological studies for informing management in Ohio.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

          Simultaneous inference is a common problem in many areas of application. If multiple null hypotheses are tested simultaneously, the probability of rejecting erroneously at least one of them increases beyond the pre-specified significance level. Simultaneous inference procedures have to be used which adjust for multiplicity and thus control the overall type I error rate. In this paper we describe simultaneous inference procedures in general parametric models, where the experimental questions are specified through a linear combination of elemental model parameters. The framework described here is quite general and extends the canonical theory of multiple comparison procedures in ANOVA models to linear regression problems, generalized linear models, linear mixed effects models, the Cox model, robust linear models, etc. Several examples using a variety of different statistical models illustrate the breadth of the results. For the analyses we use the R add-on package multcomp, which provides a convenient interface to the general approach adopted here. Copyright 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The natural history of Anaplasma marginale.

            The intracellular pathogen Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae), described by Sir Arnold Theiler in 1910, is endemic worldwide in tropical and subtropical areas. Infection of cattle with A. marginale causes bovine anaplasmosis, a mild to severe hemolytic disease that results in considerable economic loss to both dairy and beef industries. Transmission of A. marginale to cattle occurs biologically by ticks and mechanically by biting flies and by blood-contaminated fomites. Both male ticks and cattle hosts become persistently infected with A. marginale and serve as reservoirs of infection. While erythrocytes are the major site of infection in cattle, A. marginale undergoes a complex developmental cycle in ticks that begins by infection of gut cells, and transmission to susceptible hosts occurs from salivary glands during feeding. Major surface proteins (MSPs) play a crucial role in the interaction of A. marginale with host cells, and include adhesion proteins and MSPs from multigene families that undergo antigenic change and selection in cattle, thus contributing to maintenance of persistent infections. Many geographic strains of A. marginale have been identified worldwide, which vary in genotype, antigenic composition, morphology and infectivity for ticks. Isolates of A. marginale may be maintained by independent transmission events and a mechanism of infection/exclusion in cattle and ticks. The increasing numbers of A. marginale genotypes identified in some geographic regions most likely resulted from intensive cattle movement. However, concurrent A. marginale strain infections in cattle was reported, but these strains were more distantly related. Phylogenetic studies of selected geographic isolates of A. marginale, using msp4 and msp1alpha, provided information about the biogeography and evolution of A. marginale, and msp1alpha genotypes appear to have evolved under positive selection pressure. Live and killed vaccines have been used for control of anaplasmosis and both types of vaccines have advantages and disadvantages. Vaccines have effectively prevented clinical anaplasmosis in cattle but have failed to block A. marginale infection. Vaccines are needed that can prevent clinical disease and, simultaneously, prevent infection in cattle and ticks, thus eliminating these hosts as reservoirs of infection. Advances in genomics, proteomics, immunology and biochemical and molecular technologies during the last decade have been applied to research on A. marginale and related organisms, and the recent development of a cell culture system for A. marginale has provided a format for studying the pathogen/tick interface. Recent advancements and new research methodologies should provide additional opportunities for development of new strategies for control and prevention of bovine anaplasmosis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A review of bovine anaplasmosis.

              Bovine anaplasmosis, caused by Anaplasma marginale, is an infectious but non-contagious disease. It is spread through tick bites or by the mechanical transfer of fresh blood from infected to susceptible cattle from biting flies or by blood-contaminated fomites including needles, ear tagging, dehorning and castration equipment. Transplacental transmission of A. marginale may contribute to the epidemiology of bovine anaplasmosis in some regions. Bovine anaplasmosis occurs in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide. Cattle of all ages are susceptible to infection with A. marginale, but the severity of disease increases with age. Once cattle of any age become infected with A. marginale, they remain persistently infected carriers for life. Diagnosis of bovine anaplasmosis can be made by demonstration of A. marginale on stained blood smears from clinically infected animals during the acute phase of the disease, but it is not reliable for detecting infection in pre-symptomatic or carrier animals. In these instances, the infection is generally diagnosed by serologic demonstration of antibodies with confirmation by molecular detection methods. The susceptibility of wild ruminants to infection by A. marginale and the role of wild ruminants in the epidemiology of bovine anaplasmosis are incompletely known owing to lack of published research, lack of validation of diagnostic tests for these species and cross-reaction of Anaplasma spp. antibodies in serologic tests. Control measures for bovine anaplasmosis vary with geographical location and include maintenance of Anaplasma-free herds, vector control, administration of antibiotics and vaccination. © 2010 Crown in the right of Canada.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
                javma
                American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA)
                0003-1488
                September 01 2022
                September 01 2022
                : 1-5
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
                [2 ]College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
                [3 ]School of Environment and Natural Resources, College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
                Article
                10.2460/javma.22.05.0204
                36054010
                1301e35f-d847-4da7-83f2-61ea325f5808
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article