1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Parental COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy for children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a cross-sectional survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Little is known about parental coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD). This survey estimated the prevalence and predictive factors of vaccine hesitancy among parents of children with NDD.

          Methods

          A nationally representative cross-sectional survey was conducted from October 10 to 31, 2021. A structured vaccine hesitancy questionnaire was used to collect data from parents aged ≥ 18 years with children with NDD. In addition, individual face-to-face interviews were conducted at randomly selected places throughout Bangladesh. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the predictors of vaccine hesitancy.

          Results

          A total of 396 parents participated in the study. Of these, 169 (42.7%) parents were hesitant to vaccinate their children. Higher odds of vaccine hesitancy were found among parents who lived in the northern zone (AOR = 17.15, 95% CI = 5.86–50.09; p < 0.001), those who thought vaccines would not be safe and effective for Bangladeshi children (AOR = 3.22, 95% CI = 1.68–15.19; p < 0.001), those who were either not vaccinated or did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine themselves (AOR = 12.14, 95% CI = 8.48–17.36; p < 0.001), those who said that they or their family members had not tested positive for COVID-19 (AOR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.07–4.25), and those who did not lose a family member to COVID-19 (AOR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.03–4.61; p = 0.040). Furthermore, parents who were not likely to believe that their children or a family member could be infected with COVID-19 the following year (AOR = 4.99, 95% CI = 1.81–13.77; p < 0.001) and who were not concerned at all about their children or a family member being infected the following year (AOR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.65–8.37; p = 0.043) had significantly higher odds of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

          Conclusions

          Given the high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy, policymakers, public health practitioners, and pediatricians can implement and support strategies to ensure that children with NDD and their caregivers and family members receive the COVID-19 vaccine to fight pandemic induced hazards.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants.

          The SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy concluded that vaccine hesitancy refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services. Vaccine hesitancy is complex and context specific, varying across time, place and vaccines. It is influenced by factors such as complacency, convenience and confidence. The Working Group retained the term 'vaccine' rather than 'vaccination' hesitancy, although the latter more correctly implies the broader range of immunization concerns, as vaccine hesitancy is the more commonly used term. While high levels of hesitancy lead to low vaccine demand, low levels of hesitancy do not necessarily mean high vaccine demand. The Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants Matrix displays the factors influencing the behavioral decision to accept, delay or reject some or all vaccines under three categories: contextual, individual and group, and vaccine/vaccination-specific influences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007-2012.

            Vaccine "hesitancy" is an emerging term in the literature and discourse on vaccine decision-making and determinants of vaccine acceptance. It recognizes a continuum between the domains of vaccine acceptance and vaccine refusal and de-polarizes previous characterization of individuals and groups as either anti-vaccine or pro-vaccine. The primary aims of this systematic review are to: 1) identify research on vaccine hesitancy; 2) identify determinants of vaccine hesitancy in different settings including its context-specific causes, its expression and its impact; and 3) inform the development of a model for assessing determinants of vaccine hesitancy in different settings as proposed by the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts Working Group (SAGE WG) for dealing with vaccine hesitancy. A broad search strategy, built to capture multiple dimensions of public trust, confidence and hesitancy around vaccines, was applied across multiple databases. Peer-reviewed studies were selected for inclusion if they focused on childhood vaccines [≤ 7 years of age], used multivariate analyses, and were published between January 2007 and November 2012. Our results show a variety of factors as being associated with vaccine hesitancy but they do not allow for a complete classification and confirmation of their independent and relative strength of influence. Determinants of vaccine hesitancy are complex and context-specific - varying across time, place and vaccines. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination.

              Risk perceptions are central to many health behavior theories. However, the relationship between risk perceptions and behavior, muddied by instances of inappropriate assessment and analysis, often looks weak. A meta-analysis of eligible studies assessing the bivariate association between adult vaccination and perceived likelihood, susceptibility, or severity was conducted. Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria (N = 15,988). Risk likelihood (pooled r = .26), susceptibility (pooled r = .24), and severity (pooled r = .16) significantly predicted vaccination behavior. The risk perception-behavior relationship was larger for studies that were prospective, had higher quality risk measures, or had unskewed risk or behavior measures. The consistent relationships between risk perceptions and behavior, larger than suggested by prior meta-analyses, suggest that risk perceptions are rightly placed as core concepts in theories of health behavior. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m180002@student.bup.edu.bd
                physioproma@gmail.com
                zarintasnim007@gmail.com
                arifanikphysio@gmail.com
                urmit49@gmail.com
                ptsohel@gmail.com
                ptsufian21@gmail.com
                atiasharmin72@gmail.com
                khan14ku@gmail.com
                Journal
                Trop Med Health
                Trop Med Health
                Tropical Medicine and Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1348-8945
                1349-4147
                21 March 2022
                21 March 2022
                2022
                : 50
                : 24
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Uttara Adhunik Medical College and Hospital, Uttara Model Town, Dhaka, 1230 Bangladesh
                [2 ]Hasna Hena Pain Physiotherapy and Public Health Research Center (HPRC), Uttara Model Town, Dhaka, 1230 Bangladesh
                [3 ]Advanced Physiotherapy and Rehab Solution, Women’s Children’s and General Hospital, Dhanmondi, Dhaka, 1209 Bangladesh
                [4 ]GRID grid.512191.f, ISNI 0000 0004 9533 7086, Department of Neurosurgery, , Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital and Research Institute, ; Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [5 ]Zaman Mordan Hospital, Sherpur Sadar, Sherpur, 2100 Bangladesh
                [6 ]Jatio Protibondhi Seba O Sahajjo Kendro, Gopalgonj Sadar, Gopalgonj, 8100 Bangladesh
                [7 ]Department of Physiotherapy, Mount Adora Hospital, Akhalia, Sylhet, 3100 Bangladesh
                [8 ]Bashundhara Kings Football Club, Bashundhara R/A, Dhaka, 1229 Bangladesh
                [9 ]GRID grid.492922.6, Save the Children, ; Gulshan, 2, Dhaka, 1212 Bangladesh
                [10 ]GRID grid.1374.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2097 1371, University of Turku, ; 20014 Turun yliopisto, Finland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4685-5050
                Article
                415
                10.1186/s41182-022-00415-6
                8935251
                35313989
                12cbbad5-33ca-48c1-997a-650752c4633b
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 30 November 2021
                : 15 March 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Medicine
                bangladesh,covid-19,pediatrics,neurodevelopmental disorders,parental vaccine hesitancy
                Medicine
                bangladesh, covid-19, pediatrics, neurodevelopmental disorders, parental vaccine hesitancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article