39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Moral Judgement in Early Bilinguals: Language Dominance Influences Responses to Moral Dilemmas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Foreign-Language effect (FLe) on morality describes how late bilinguals make different decisions on moral judgements, when presented in either their native or foreign language. However the relevance of this phenomenon to early bilinguals, where a language's “nativeness” is less distinct, is unknown. This study aims to verify the effect of early bilinguals' languages on their moral decisions and examine how language experience may influence these decisions. Eighty-six early English-Chinese bilinguals were asked to perform a moral dilemmas task consisting of personal and impersonal dilemmas, in either English or Mandarin Chinese. Information on language experience factors were also collected from the participants. Findings suggest that early bilinguals do show evidence of a language effect on their moral decisions, which is dependent on how dominant they are in the language. Particularly, the more dominant participants were in their tested language, the larger the difference between their personal and impersonal dilemma response choice. In light of these findings, the study discusses the need to re-examine how we conceptualize the FLe phenomenon and its implications on bilinguals' moral judgement. It also addresses the importance of treating bilingualism as multidimensional, rather than a unitary variable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pushing moral buttons: the interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment.

          In some cases people judge it morally acceptable to sacrifice one person's life in order to save several other lives, while in other similar cases they make the opposite judgment. Researchers have identified two general factors that may explain this phenomenon at the stimulus level: (1) the agent's intention (i.e. whether the harmful event is intended as a means or merely foreseen as a side-effect) and (2) whether the agent harms the victim in a manner that is relatively "direct" or "personal". Here we integrate these two classes of findings. Two experiments examine a novel personalness/directness factor that we call personal force, present when the force that directly impacts the victim is generated by the agent's muscles (e.g., in pushing). Experiments 1a and b demonstrate the influence of personal force on moral judgment, distinguishing it from physical contact and spatial proximity. Experiments 2a and b demonstrate an interaction between personal force and intention, whereby the effect of personal force depends entirely on intention. These studies also introduce a method for controlling for people's real-world expectations in decisions involving potentially unrealistic hypothetical dilemmas.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.

            Researchers have recently argued that utilitarianism is the appropriate framework by which to evaluate moral judgment, and that individuals who endorse non-utilitarian solutions to moral dilemmas (involving active vs. passive harm) are committing an error. We report a study in which participants responded to a battery of personality assessments and a set of dilemmas that pit utilitarian and non-utilitarian options against each other. Participants who indicated greater endorsement of utilitarian solutions had higher scores on measures of Psychopathy, machiavellianism, and life meaninglessness. These results question the widely-used methods by which lay moral judgments are evaluated, as these approaches lead to the counterintuitive conclusion that those individuals who are least prone to moral errors also possess a set of psychological characteristics that many would consider prototypically immoral. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                28 June 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 1070
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Linguistics and Multilingual Studies, School of Humanities, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore, Singapore
                [2] 2Neurolinguistics and Cognitive Science Laboratory, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore, Singapore
                [3] 3Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore, Singapore
                Author notes

                Edited by: Petko Kusev, University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Albert Costa, Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Spain; Lesya Ganushchak, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Bee Chin Ng mbcng@ 123456ntu.edu.sg

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01070
                6032433
                30002639
                129daf54-e1d5-4d5f-9b0e-b5cabb020f00
                Copyright © 2018 Wong and Ng.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 08 December 2017
                : 06 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 43, Pages: 10, Words: 7653
                Funding
                Funded by: Nanyang Technological University 10.13039/501100001475
                Award ID: RG159/14
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                early bilinguals,language dominance,moral dilemmas,decision-making,emotion

                Comments

                Comment on this article