0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Organizational Pathways With the Delay of Emergency Surgery

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines rates of delayed emergency surgery in French hospitals that have a dedicated emergency surgery department and team, a dedicated emergency operating room, or no dedicated emergency operating room or team.

          Key Points

          Question

          What is the global frequency of delayed management of surgical emergencies in France?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 1149 patients, the frequency of delayed emergency surgery was 32.5% and varied substantially across 3 distinct organizational pathways of care: dedicated emergency surgery department and team, dedicated emergency operating room, and no dedicated emergency operating room or team.

          Meaning

          This study demonstrated a substantial global frequency of delayed emergency surgery in France, with large differences depending on the organizational pathway.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Delayed admission of patients with surgical emergencies to the operating room occurs frequently and is associated with poor outcomes. In France, where 3 distinct organizational pathways in hospitals exist (a dedicated emergency operating room and team [DET], a dedicated operating room in a central operating theater [DOR], and no dedicated structure or team [NOR]), neither the incidence nor the influence of delayed urgent surgery is known, and no guidelines are available to date.

          Objective

          To examine the overall frequency of delayed admission of patients with surgical emergencies to the operating room across the 3 organizational pathways in hospitals in France.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in 10 French tertiary hospitals. All consecutive adult patients admitted for emergency surgery from October 5 to 16, 2020, were included and prospectively monitored. Patients requiring pediatric surgery, obstetrics, interventional radiology, or endoscopic procedures were excluded.

          Exposures

          Emergency surgery.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The main outcome was the global incidence of delayed emergency surgery across 3 predefined organizational pathways: DET, DOR, and NOR. The ratio between the actual time to surgery (observed duration between surgical indication and incision) and the ideal time to surgery (predefined optimal duration between surgical indication and incision according to the Non-Elective Surgery Triage classification) was calculated for each patient. Surgery was considered delayed when this ratio was greater than 1.

          Results

          A total of 1149 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 55 [21] years; 685 [59.9%] males): 649 in the DET group, 320 in the DOR group, and 171 in the NOR group (missing data: n = 5). The global frequency of surgical delay was 32.5% (95% CI, 29.8%-35.3%) and varied across the 3 organizational pathways: DET, 28.4% (95% CI, 24.8%-31.9%); DOR, 32.2% (95% CI, 27.0%-37.4%); and NOR, 49.1% (95% CI, 41.6%-56.7%) ( P < .001). The adjusted odds ratio for delay was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.17-2.78) when comparing NOR with DET.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cohort study, the frequency of delayed emergency surgery in France was 32.5%. Reduced delays were found in organizational pathways that included dedicated theaters and teams. These preliminary results may pave the way for comprehensive large-scale studies, from which results may potentially inform new guidelines for quicker and safer access to emergency surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version.

            Recommended standards for analyzing and reporting on lower extremity ischemia were first published by the Journal of Vascular Surgery in 1986 after approval by the Joint Council of The Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. Many of these standards have been accepted and are used in the current literature on peripheral arterial occlusive disease. With the passage of time, some oversights, aspects that require clarification, and better modifications have been recognized. This report attempts to correct these shortcomings while reinforcing those recommendations that have proven satisfactory. Explanatory comments are added to facilitate understanding and application. This version is intended to replace the original version.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II).

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                13 April 2023
                April 2023
                13 April 2023
                : 6
                : 4
                : e238145
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Pôle d’anesthésie-réanimation, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
                [2 ]Division of Anesthesia–Critical Care, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
                [3 ]Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
                [4 ]Université de Paris, Inserm, Innovations Thérapeutiques en Hémostase, Paris, France
                [5 ]Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d’Angers, Angers, France
                [6 ]University of Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
                [7 ]Biostatistics Department, CHU Lille, Lille, France
                [8 ]Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Henri Mondor University Hospital of Paris, Paris XII School of Medicine, Creteil, France
                [9 ]Service d’Anesthésie Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
                [10 ]AP-HP, Beaujon University Hospital, DMU PARBOL, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Clichy, France
                [11 ]Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
                [12 ]Espace Ethique Méditerranéen, Efaculté de Médecine de Marseille, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
                [13 ]Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine, Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Médecine, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, ER 3072, Strasbourg, France
                [14 ]Université Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694–METRICS, Lille, France
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: February 24, 2023.
                Published: April 13, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8145
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2023 Lepercq D et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Delphine Garrigue-Huet, MD, Pôle d’anesthésie-réanimation, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France ( delphine.garrigue@ 123456chu-lille.fr ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Lepercq and Garrigue-Huet had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Lepercq, Gauss, Godier, Bellet, Bouhours, Bouzat, Gauthier, Lamblin, Pottecher, Tavernier, Garrigue-Huet.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Lepercq, Gauss, Godier, Bellet, Bouhours, Cailliau, Cook, David, Drame, Gauthier, Lamblin, Pottecher, Tavernier, Garrigue-Huet.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Lepercq, Gauss, Bellet, Gauthier, Pottecher, Tavernier, Garrigue-Huet.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Gauss, Godier, Bouhours, Bouzat, Cailliau, Cook, David, Drame, Lamblin, Pottecher, Garrigue-Huet.
                Statistical analysis: Bouhours, Cailliau, Gauthier.
                Obtained funding: Lepercq, Pottecher, Tavernier.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Lepercq, Godier, Bellet, Drame, Gauthier, Lamblin, Tavernier, Garrigue-Huet.
                Supervision: Gauss, Bouzat, David, Gauthier, Lamblin, Pottecher, Tavernier, Garrigue-Huet.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lepercq reported receiving a research grant from the Société Française d’Anesthésie-Réanimation (French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care) to the Lille University Hospital during the conduct of the study. Dr Gauss reported receiving personal fees and honoraria from Laboratoire du Biomédicament Français outside the submitted work. Dr Bouzat reported receiving personal fees for lecturing from LFB and nonfinancial support from Prytime outside the submitted work. Dr David reported receiving personal fees for lecturing from LFB Laboratory outside the submitted work. Dr Pottecher reported receiving grants from RDS, Edwards Lifesciences, AOP Orphan, Acticor, and LFB Biomedicaments outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by a research grant from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (Dr Lepercq).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
                Additional Contributions: Substantial data collection contributions to the work reported in this manuscript were made by the following: A. Lamer, N. Martignène, H. Behal, A. Duhamel, PhD, E. Robin, MD, P. Richart, MD, M. Gonzalez Estevez, MD, H. Meng, MD, E. Kipnis, MD, PhD, M. Garot, MD, E. Vega, MD, J. Desbordes, MD, PhD, and C. Demichel, MD (University Hospital, Lille); J. S. Aubert, MD, and D. Zlotnik, MD (Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou); A. Couve de Murville, MD, and O. Monneuse, MD, PhD (Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon); Y. Guyon, MD, L. Haumesser, MD, and S. Hecketsweiler (TEC Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre); and A. Li, MD, A. Lambert, MD, and O. Vassal, MD (Groupe Hospitalier Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon). No compensation was given.
                Article
                zoi230261
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8145
                10102875
                37052916
                11e9b69e-6fff-4e24-bcc6-171bf0f1dfd3
                Copyright 2023 Lepercq D et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 27 November 2022
                : 24 February 2023
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Critical Care Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article