5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is increasing interest in the use of technology to support social health in dementia. The primary objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence of effectiveness of digital technologies used by people with dementia to improve self-management and social participation. Records published from 1 January 2007 to 9 April 2020 were identified from Pubmed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Controlled interventional studies evaluating interventions based on any digital technology were included if: primary users of the technology had dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI); and the study reported outcomes relevant to self-management or social participation. Studies were clustered by population, intervention, and outcomes, and narrative synthesis was undertaken. Of 1394 records identified, nine met the inclusion criteria: two were deemed to be of poor methodological quality, six of fair quality, and one of good quality. Three clusters of technologies were identified: virtual reality, wearables, and software applications. We identified weak evidence that digital technologies may provide less benefit to people with dementia than people with MCI. Future research should address the methodological limitations and narrow scope of existing work. In the absence of strong evidence, clinicians and caregivers must use their judgement to appraise available technologies on a case-by-case basis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

          Evaluating complex interventions is complicated. The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task. Now the council has updated its guidance
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance

            Process evaluation is an essential part of designing and testing complex interventions. New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                05 February 2021
                February 2021
                : 10
                : 4
                : 604
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location VUMC, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; t.ettema@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl
                [2 ]Department of Linguistics and English as a Second Language, University of Groningen, 9712 EK Groningen, The Netherlands; f.a.van.den.berg@ 123456rug.nl
                [3 ]Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, 1070 BB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; c.planting@ 123456ggzingeest.nl
                [4 ]Research Group Nursing, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, 7417 DH Deventer, The Netherlands; k.dijkstra@ 123456saxion.nl
                [5 ]Health Sciences-Nursing Research, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; e.j.finnema@ 123456umcg.nl
                [6 ]Department of Healthcare, NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences, 8917 DD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
                [7 ]School of Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, 9747 AS Groningen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7916-3299
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-1293
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-153X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9874-6075
                Article
                jcm-10-00604
                10.3390/jcm10040604
                7915697
                33562749
                11e7043b-8035-47b3-8767-95dd494a6478
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 17 December 2020
                : 29 January 2021
                Categories
                Review

                dementia,mild cognitive impairment,digital technology,social health,social participation,self-management,caregiver support

                Comments

                Comment on this article