8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction and hypothesis

          The paucity of long-term safety and efficacy data to support laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy is noteworthy given concerns about the use of polypropylene mesh in pelvic floor surgery. This study is aimed at determining the incidence of mesh-associated complications and reoperation following this procedure.

          Methods

          This was a cross-sectional postal questionnaire study of women who underwent laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy between 2010 and 2018. Potential participants were identified from surgical databases of five surgeons at two tertiary urogynaecology centres in the UK. The primary outcome was patient-reported mesh complication requiring removal of hysteropexy mesh. Secondary outcomes included other mesh-associated complications, reoperation rates and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) in prolapse symptoms. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used.

          Results

          Of 1,766 eligible participants, 1,121 women responded (response proportion 63.5%), at a median follow-up of 46 months. The incidence of mesh complications requiring removal of hysteropexy mesh was 0.4% (4 out of 1,121). The rate of chronic pain service use was 1.8%, and newly diagnosed systemic autoimmune disorders was 5.8%. The rate of reoperation for apical prolapse was 3.7%, and for any form of pelvic organ prolapse it was 13.6%. For PGI-I, 81.4% of patients were “much better” or “very much better”.

          Conclusions

          Laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy has a low incidence of reoperation for mesh complications and apical prolapse, and a high rate of patient-reported improvement in prolapse symptoms. With appropriate clinical governance measures, the procedure offers an alternative to vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension. However, long-term comparative studies are still required.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-020-04396-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners

            The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data management platform was developed in 2004 to address an institutional need at Vanderbilt University, then shared with a limited number of adopting sites beginning in 2006. Given bi-directional benefit in early sharing experiments, we created a broader consortium sharing and support model for any academic, non-profit, or government partner wishing to adopt the software. Our sharing framework and consortium-based support model have evolved over time along with the size of the consortium (currently more than 3200 REDCap partners across 128 countries). While the "REDCap Consortium" model represents only one example of how to build and disseminate a software platform, lessons learned from our approach may assist other research institutions seeking to build and disseminate innovative technologies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

              More than 225 000 surgeries are performed annually in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the most durable POP surgery, but little is known about safety and long-term effectiveness.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.izett@ucl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Int Urogynecol J
                Int Urogynecol J
                International Urogynecology Journal
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0937-3462
                1433-3023
                3 July 2020
                3 July 2020
                2020
                : 31
                : 12
                : 2595-2602
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.439749.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0612 2754, Urogynaecology and Pelvic Floor Unit, , University College London Hospitals, Clinic 2, ; Lower Ground Floor, EGA Wing, 235 Euston Road, London, NW12BU UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, , University College London, ; Medical School Building, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.410556.3, ISNI 0000 0001 0440 1440, Department of Urogynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, , Oxford University Hospitals, ; Headley Way, Oxford, Headington OX3 9DU UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0126-5177
                Article
                4396
                10.1007/s00192-020-04396-0
                7679361
                32620978
                11a8e56a-94a0-4458-ae86-d1101784152d
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 13 February 2020
                : 12 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: University College London (UCL)
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The International Urogynecological Association 2020

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                laparoscopy,pelvic organ prolapse,reoperation,surgical mesh,uterine prolapse

                Comments

                Comment on this article