0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Prostate volume (PV) in combination with prostate specific antigen (PSA) yields PSA density which is an increasingly important biomarker. Calculating PV from MRI is a time-consuming, radiologist-dependent task. The aim of this study was to assess whether a deep learning algorithm can replace PI-RADS 2.1 based ellipsoid formula (EF) for calculating PV.

          Methods

          Eight different measures of PV were retrospectively collected for each of 124 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and preoperative MRI of the prostate (multicenter and multi-scanner MRI’s 1.5 and 3 T). Agreement between volumes obtained from the deep learning algorithm (PV DL) and ellipsoid formula by two radiologists (PV EF1 and PV EF2) was evaluated against the reference standard PV obtained by manual planimetry by an expert radiologist (PV MPE). A sensitivity analysis was performed using a prostatectomy specimen as the reference standard. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated between the radiologists using the ellipsoid formula and between the expert and inexperienced radiologists performing manual planimetry.

          Results

          PV DL showed better agreement and precision than PV EF1 and PV EF2 using the reference standard PV MPE (mean difference [95% limits of agreement] PV DL: −0.33 [−10.80; 10.14], PV EF1: −3.83 [−19.55; 11.89], PV EF2: −3.05 [−18.55; 12.45]) or the PV determined based on specimen weight (PV DL: −4.22 [−22.52; 14.07], PV EF1: −7.89 [−30.50; 14.73], PV EF2: −6.97 [−30.13; 16.18]). Inter-reader agreement was excellent between the two experienced radiologists using the ellipsoid formula and was good between expert and inexperienced radiologists performing manual planimetry.

          Conclusion

          Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI.

          Key Points

          • A commercially available deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI.

          • The deep-learning algorithm was previously untrained on this heterogenous multicenter day-to-day practice MRI data set.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09239-8.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species

          Lee Dice (1945)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study

            Men with high serum prostate specific antigen usually undergo transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy). TRUS-biopsy can cause side-effects including bleeding, pain, and infection. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) used as a triage test might allow men to avoid unnecessary TRUS-biopsy and improve diagnostic accuracy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis

              Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without targeted biopsy, is an alternative to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who have not undergone biopsy. However, comparative evidence is limited.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                per_erik.thimansson@med.lu.se
                Journal
                Eur Radiol
                Eur Radiol
                European Radiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0938-7994
                1432-1084
                12 November 2022
                12 November 2022
                2023
                : 33
                : 4
                : 2519-2528
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4514.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0930 2361, Department of Translational Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, , Lund University, ; Carl-Bertil Laurells gata 9, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
                [2 ]GRID grid.413823.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0624 046X, Department of Radiology, , Helsingborg Hospital, ; Helsingborg, Sweden
                [3 ]GRID grid.4514.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0930 2361, Department of Clinical Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, , Lund University, ; Lund, Sweden
                [4 ]GRID grid.411843.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0623 9987, Department of Imaging and Functional Medicine, , Skåne University Hospital, ; Malmö, Sweden
                [5 ]GRID grid.411843.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0623 9987, Department of Imaging and Functional Medicine, , Skåne University Hospital, ; Lund, Sweden
                [6 ]GRID grid.4514.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0930 2361, Department of Translational Medicine, Urological Cancers, , Lund University, ; Malmö, Sweden
                [7 ]GRID grid.411843.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0623 9987, Department of Urology, , Skåne University Hospital, ; Malmö, Sweden
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4663-8520
                Article
                9239
                10.1007/s00330-022-09239-8
                10017633
                36371606
                1199c36a-fff2-4f6a-b9fb-08326ee75694
                © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 12 April 2022
                : 26 September 2022
                : 13 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006738, Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009780, Region Skåne;
                Categories
                Magnetic Resonance
                Custom metadata
                © European Society of Radiology 2023

                Radiology & Imaging
                magnetic resonance imaging,prostate neoplasms,deep learning,prostate-specific antigen

                Comments

                Comment on this article