16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experiences of gestational diabetes and gestational diabetes care: a focus group and interview study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly common condition of pregnancy. It is associated with adverse fetal, infant and maternal outcomes, as well as an increased risk of GDM in future pregnancies and type 2 diabetes for both mother and offspring. Previous studies have shown that GDM can result in an emotionally distressing pregnancy, but there is little research on the patient experience of GDM care, especially of a demographically diverse UK population. The aim of this research was to explore the experiences of GDM and GDM care for a group of women attending a large diabetes pregnancy unit in southeast London, UK, in order to improve care.

          Methods

          Framework analysis was used to support an integrated analysis of data from six focus groups with 35 women and semi-structured interviews with 15 women, held in 2015. Participants were purposively sampled and were representative of the population being studied in terms of ethnicity, age, deprivation score and body mass index (BMI).

          Results

          We identified seven themes: the disrupted pregnancy, projected anxiety, reproductive asceticism, women as baby machines, perceived stigma, lack of shared understanding and postpartum abandonment. These themes highlight the often distressing experience of GDM. While most women were grateful for the intensive support they received during pregnancy, the costs to their personal autonomy were high. Women described feeling valued solely as a means to produce a healthy infant, and felt chastised if they failed to adhere to the behaviours required to achieve this. This sometimes had an enduring impact to the potential detriment of women’s long-term psychological and physical health.

          Conclusions

          This study reveals the experiences of a demographically diverse group of patients with GDM, reflecting findings from previous studies globally and extending analysis to the context of improving care. Healthcare delivery may need to be reoriented to improve the pregnancy experience and help ensure women are engaged and attentive to their own health, particularly after birth, without compromising clinical pregnancy outcomes. Areas for consideration in GDM healthcare include: improved management of emotional responses to GDM; a more motivational approach; rethinking the medicalisation of care; and improved postpartum care.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1657-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book Chapter: not found

          Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.

            Metformin is a logical treatment for women with gestational diabetes mellitus, but randomized trials to assess the efficacy and safety of its use for this condition are lacking. We randomly assigned 751 women with gestational diabetes mellitus at 20 to 33 weeks of gestation to open treatment with metformin (with supplemental insulin if required) or insulin. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, need for phototherapy, birth trauma, 5-minute Apgar score less than 7, or prematurity. The trial was designed to rule out a 33% increase (from 30% to 40%) in this composite outcome in infants of women treated with metformin as compared with those treated with insulin. Secondary outcomes included neonatal anthropometric measurements, maternal glycemic control, maternal hypertensive complications, postpartum glucose tolerance, and acceptability of treatment. Of the 363 women assigned to metformin, 92.6% continued to receive metformin until delivery and 46.3% received supplemental insulin. The rate of the primary composite outcome was 32.0% in the group assigned to metformin and 32.2% in the insulin group (relative risk, 0.99 [corrected]; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 [corrected] to 1.23 [corrected]). More women in the metformin group than in the insulin group stated that they would choose to receive their assigned treatment again (76.6% vs. 27.2%, P<0.001). The rates of other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. There were no serious adverse events associated with the use of metformin. In women with gestational diabetes mellitus, metformin (alone or with supplemental insulin) is not associated with increased perinatal complications as compared with insulin. The women preferred metformin to insulin treatment. (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, 12605000311651.). Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +44 (0)7590 717262 , judith.parsons@kcl.ac.uk
                katherine.sparrow@kcl.ac.uk
                khalida.2.ismail@kcl.ac.uk
                katharine.f.hunt@kcl.ac.uk
                helenrogers@nhs.net
                angus.forbes@kcl.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                11 January 2018
                11 January 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 25
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, GRID grid.13097.3c, Adult Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, , King’s College London, ; James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, GRID grid.13097.3c, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, , King’s College London, ; London, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, GRID grid.13097.3c, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, , King’s College London, ; London, UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, GRID grid.13097.3c, Diabetes Research Group, Diabetes & Nutritional Sciences Division, , King’s College London, ; London, UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, GRID grid.13097.3c, Diabetes Research Group, Diabetes & Nutritional Sciences Division, , King’s College London, ; London, UK
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, GRID grid.13097.3c, Adult Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, , King’s College London, ; London, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-5940
                Article
                1657
                10.1186/s12884-018-1657-9
                5765597
                29325518
                10e21d2e-610d-4504-825d-681ff62a5b99
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 27 January 2017
                : 4 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000659, Research Trainees Coordinating Centre;
                Award ID: DRF-2013-06-054
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                gestational diabetes,care experience,pregnancy care,emotional distress,diabetes prevention

                Comments

                Comment on this article