8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Indications for stent omission after ureteroscopic lithotripsy defined: A single-institution experience with cost analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Objectives: To report on our experience with the use of an evidence-based algorithm defining specific indications for stent omission (SO) after ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), as stent placement has been associated with increased cost and morbidity and indications for SO in the setting of uncomplicated ureteroscopy have been proposed but remain vague.

          Patients and methods: Indications for SO were defined as per the attached figure, data from URSL procedures performed from January 2016 to September 2017 were collected. For procedures eligible for SO, preoperative and intraoperative factors were recorded including: stone burden, presence of preoperative stent, procedure time, access sheath use, and whether SO was performed. Morbidity data were reviewed including: postoperative events, patient telephone calls for bothersome symptoms, unplanned return visits, and admissions within 30 days.

          Results: In all, 250 URSL procedures were performed during the study period, and 106 (42.4%) were eligible for SO. SO was performed in 60 (24.0%) cases reflecting a 56.7% compliance with the algorithm. There were no readmissions or re-operations within 30 days for the SO group. Lower postoperative event rates were noted in the SO group (16.7% vs 34.8%, P = 0.03), unplanned return visits (8.3% vs 17.4%, P = 0.16) and 30-day readmission rates (0.0% vs 6.5%, P = 0.08) were also lower in the SO group, although they did not reach statistical significance. Analysis also demonstrated a protective effect of SO on unplanned return visits (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.13–1.42, P = 0.17), although this was not statistically significant. No statistically significant associations were noted between postoperative events and stone burden, procedure time, or presence of preoperative stent.

          Conclusions: We provide an algorithm defining indications for SO. SO is safe in a significant portion of URSL procedures, and SO appears to decrease postoperative events when performed judiciously.

          Abbreviations: IQR: interquartile range; LUTS: lower urinary tract symptoms; OR, odds ratio; SO: stent omission; URSL: ureteroscopic lithotripsy; YAG: yttrium-aluminium-garnet

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents.

          To prospectively assess the prevalence and bother of various urinary tract symptoms caused by indwelling ureteral stents using validated questionnaires. The study consisted of 60 patients with unilateral ureteral stents. Of these, 30 patients were asked to complete the International Prostate Symptoms Score questionnaire, with additional questions on dysuria, hematuria, and loin pain. The remaining 30 patients were asked to complete the International Continence Society questionnaire. These patients were also asked to complete frequency volume charts and undergo uroflowmetry studies. The questionnaires were completed with a stent in situ and 6 weeks after its removal. Forty-eight patients (36 men and 12 women, mean age 52.8 years) completed the study. A large proportion (80%) of patients reported one or more urinary symptoms. Analysis of the IPSS data revealed impaired global quality of life owing to these urinary symptoms. The responses to additional questions on dysuria and hematuria showed a statistically significant difference, but most International Prostate Symptoms Score questions did not. The results of the International Continence Society study identified storage symptoms, incontinence (60%), and bladder pain (80%) as important bothersome problems. The results of the frequency volume charts were in agreement with the storage symptoms. Patients with indwelling ureteral stents have a wide range of urinary symptoms that affect their quality of life. Storage symptoms, bladder pain, and hematuria pose a major bother. None of the existing questionnaires covered the entire range of symptoms. The results are useful in better understanding the urinary symptoms associated with stents and in providing patient counseling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A cost analysis of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal.

            To evaluate the outcome and the costs of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              Arab J Urol
              TAJU
              taju20
              Arab Journal of Urology
              Taylor & Francis
              2090-598X
              2090-5998
              2019
              16 May 2019
              : 17
              : 3
              : 206-211
              Affiliations
              Section of Minimally Invasive Urology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University , Providence, RI, USA
              Author notes
              CONTACT Gyan Pareek gyan_pareek@ 123456brown.edu Section of Minimally Invasive Urology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University , 2 Dudley St., Suite 174, Providence, RI 02905, USA
              Author information
              http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6846-8852
              Article
              1614243
              10.1080/2090598X.2019.1614243
              6711146
              10e0c1b2-bf20-4aad-9019-a2201d1b47aa
              © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

              This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

              History
              : 29 January 2019
              : 15 April 2019
              Page count
              Figures: 2, Tables: 4, References: 14, Pages: 6
              Categories
              Stones/Endourology

              ureteroscopy,stone complications,ureteric stent,stent omission,nephrolithiasis

              Comments

              Comment on this article