16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Five myths about variable selection

      1 ,   1
      Transplant International
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Multivariable regression models are often used in transplantation research to identify or to confirm baseline variables which have an independent association, causally or only evidenced by statistical correlation, with transplantation outcome. Although sound theory is lacking, variable selection is a popular statistical method which seemingly reduces the complexity of such models. However, in fact, variable selection often complicates analysis as it invalidates common tools of statistical inference such as P-values and confidence intervals. This is a particular problem in transplantation research where sample sizes are often only small to moderate. Furthermore, variable selection requires computer-intensive stability investigations and a particularly cautious interpretation of results. We discuss how five common misconceptions often lead to inappropriate application of variable selection. We emphasize that variable selection and all problems related with it can often be avoided by the use of expert knowledge.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.

            The rule of thumb that logistic and Cox models should be used with a minimum of 10 outcome events per predictor variable (EPV), based on two simulation studies, may be too conservative. The authors conducted a large simulation study of other influences on confidence interval coverage, type I error, relative bias, and other model performance measures. They found a range of circumstances in which coverage and bias were within acceptable levels despite less than 10 EPV, as well as other factors that were as influential as or more influential than EPV. They conclude that this rule can be relaxed, in particular for sensitivity analyses undertaken to demonstrate adequate control of confounding.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Causal Diagrams for Epidemiologic Research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Transplant International
                Transpl Int
                Wiley
                09340874
                January 2017
                January 2017
                December 29 2016
                : 30
                : 1
                : 6-10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Section for Clinical Biometrics; Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
                Article
                10.1111/tri.12895
                27896874
                1095c98b-0d8a-4905-bde0-6943c29f27dd
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article